User talk:B4theword

Be careful with the article about Barbara Stadtlander. Most of it appears to be copied directly from http://www.barbarastadtlander.com/biograph.htm, which makes the Wikipedia article a copyright violation. Copyright violations can be word-for-word or similar wordings (not necessarily verbatim). Articles can definitely cite information from various websites, but should be in the words of the author(s). I will do what I can to help avoid the copyright problems. --JonRidinger (talk) 20:08, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, B4theword. You have new messages at JonRidinger's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Non-free rationale for File:Feat choi sung bong.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Feat choi sung bong.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:05, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Press Photo - Author Jason P. Stadtlander.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Press Photo - Author Jason P. Stadtlander.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Jason Stadtlander, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Arctic Kangaroo 16:46, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lovers of Valdaro.jpg

The image has been deleted as Wikipedia can't use images that are from photo libraries like AP (or Getty) as the company do not licence them under terms that are compatible with Wikipedia licencing conditions. Widely available on the internet is not the same as being in the public domain and the onus is on you as the uploader do show that the image is either in the public domain or released under a free licence. As a rule of thumb unless an image on the internet expressly says it is in the public domain or has a free licence, for example a creative commons licence, attached to it assume it is not in the public domain and is subject to copyright. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions about images you might want to upload and want help with the licence. There is no aversion to images being uploaded but the rules about copyright are quite labyrinthine and do take some understanding. NtheP (talk) 21:36, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Press Photo - Author Jason P. Stadtlander.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Press Photo - Author Jason P. Stadtlander.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File inaccuracy (File:File:Authors Jason P. Stadtlander & T.Michelle Nelson.jpg)

You had uploaded the file referenced above and it actually did not have T. Michelle Nelson. I obtained another photo that I had taken at the same book signing. Please have the other one corrected or deleted.

Thank you HighMerrits (talk) 17:05, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jason Stadtlander for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jason Stadtlander is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Stadtlander until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:34, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sourcing

I noticed that you're new here and that you've been adding articles for some relatively indie authors. I wanted to drop a note here and explain why some of your pages have been nominated for deletion. First off, I just have to ask... are you in any way affiliated with any of the authors you're creating pages for? If you are a friend, family member, associate, or someone that they have asked to create a page for them in any way (whether they pay you for it or not), then you really need to exercise a lot of caution in creating pages with what Wikipedia considers to be a conflict of interest. (WP:COI) While there's nothing in the rules that state that you can't create a page with a COI, it's heavily discouraged.

Secondly, I need to warn you about the sources you're using. Sites like Goodreads and Amazon are never usable as a source in any way, shape, or form. Goodreads can be edited by almost anyone with a computer and even then, the site just confirms a book's existence. As far as reviews go, those don't count towards notability here on Wikipedia. Anyone can have an account on either of those two sites, so it's easy to say "oh, well, people love this book- look at all of the good reviews" and have the reviews be partially faked. Now before you get upset and say that the authors you're posting about don't do that sort of thing, know that some authors do. Robert Stanek is infamous for posting hundreds of reviews about himself on various sites. In any case, that's part of the reason (but not the only reason) that the only reviews we accept as reliable sourcing are the types that come from the bigger papers and more well-known, verifiable critics. Amazon and Goodreads are so easily edited by the author or by others, not to mention that Amazon is a merchant source, so neither of them are usable as far as giving notability goes. Primary sources such as the author's website do not give notability either. They can back up that the author has published or done something, but just doing something doesn't give notability in and of itself. It has to be reported on in multiple independent and reliable sources. This brings me to the local paper coverage. Local coverage isn't really considered to be enough when it comes to showing notability, partially because when you get down to it sometimes it's not that hard for authors to get it if they have a good publicist or can send out a good query letter themselves. It's not always easy, but then it's not entirely difficult either.

I know that it's probably frustrating considering that you did go through AfC and someone approved this, but in this instance they were wrong when it came to the Stadtlander ‎article. Mistakes do happen and sometimes even the more seasoned editors will let something through AfC that they shouldn't. I hope that this doesn't discourage you too much, but you really need to know some of these basics when it comes to Wikipedia. I've got a bit of a page I'm working on as far as notability and arguments go and you can see this here, if you're interested in reading this in more detail. (And yes, despite my three paragraphs, there is more to all of this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:46, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the good rule of thumb is that if someone can only be sourced by a primary source, odds are that whatever it is isn't notable per Wikipedia. If someone won an award but there's no mention of the award anywhere, then odds are that the award isn't really notable per Wikipedia's guidelines. You should also be careful about overreliance on primary sources. It's fine to pull some information, basic information, from a primary source, but you shouldn't write an entire article based on a primary source. Why? Because primary sources are almost always written to show the subject in the best light possible. So awards or accomplishments that might be not all that big of an accomplishment will be promoted to be amazingly huge, bigger than what they are. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:57, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Barbara Stadtlander for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barbara Stadtlander is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Stadtlander until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:07, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, B4theword. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ColinFine (talk) 18:15, 20 August 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandra McLeod Humphrey (October 16)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sandra McLeod Humphrey.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rankersbo (talk) 10:18, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! B4theword, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

undefined

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question on Jason P. Stadtlander

Hello, B4theword! I'm Anon126. I have replied to your question on the Articles for Creation Help Desk about Jason P. Stadtlander.
You can read it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jason P. Stadtlander. Anon126 (talk - contribs) 19:26, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sandra McLeod Humphrey concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sandra McLeod Humphrey, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sandra McLeod Humphrey

Hello B4theword. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Sandra McLeod Humphrey".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sandra McLeod Humphrey}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 08:00, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]