User talk:Az.jooma

This is Az.jooma's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aliza Ayaz (August 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

References need some serious cleanup. Please identify WP:THREE sources that show she is notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aliza Ayaz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aliza Ayaz, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Az.jooma! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Aliza Ayaz concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Aliza Ayaz, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aliza Ayaz

Hello, Az.jooma. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aliza Ayaz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. kingboyk (talk) 12:01, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Az.jooma, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Angus¹⁹⁸⁶ TALK 12:57, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aliza Ayaz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aliza Ayaz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aliza Ayaz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Angus¹⁹⁸⁶ TALK 13:04, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It may be worthwhile having a look at the deletion nomination (above). I've also left some hopefully helpful suggestions across at the article's talk page. Esowteric+Talk 17:53, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You could even leave a comment at the deletion nomination page, perhaps listing your three best independent, reliable references from the article to support your case. Esowteric+Talk 17:56, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello Az.jooma. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Az.jooma. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Az.jooma|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GeneralNotability (talk) 20:39, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting Assistance for Creating a Wikipedia Profile for Aneeqa Bashir

Hello Az.jooma,

I hope this message finds you well. My name is Afshaan, and I am reaching out to experienced Wikipedia editors like yourself to seek guidance on creating a Wikipedia profile for Aneeqa Bashir, a notable climate activist from Pakistan.

Aneeqa has been actively involved in raising awareness about climate change and has significantly contributed to preserving Pakistan's green heritage. Her work has been recognized and appreciated in various platforms. I believe that her contributions are notable enough to be documented on Wikipedia. However, I understand that Wikipedia has strict guidelines to prevent promotional content, and I would like to ensure that the profile adheres to all the rules and regulations set by Wikipedia.

Could you please guide me on how to create an accurate and informative profile for Aneeqa Bashir that complies with Wikipedia's standards?

Thank you for your time and assistance. Best regards, Afshaan Afshaaan.ahmed (talk) 04:59, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]