User talk:Niki tibble

Welcome!

Hello, Awaywithwords.ink, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 20:43, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Based on this I gather you are editing Wikipedia to get paid. If that's the case, and I don't see how it's not, you are obliged to disclose that fact (See WP:PAID and WP:COIDISCLOSEPAY). Also you are not allowed to advertise your services on Wikipedia (WP:NOT). Kleuske (talk) 20:54, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read and heed WP:PAID. There are likely things you must do before editing further. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:59, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - paid editing

Thank you - have amended. Niki Awaywithwords.ink (talk) 21:20, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Awaywithwords.ink. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Draft:Dan Poole, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 21:55, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Theroadislong.

I’d made the disclosure so am I right in thinking that I just need to wait for the article to go through the Articles For Creation process (subst:submit) rather than putting it into the mainspace myself?

Sorry, I thought it was just the disclosure that was required - lots to take in when starting on Wiki! Any help/advice appreciated :)

Niki Awaywithwords.ink (talk) 22:26, 17 January 2018 (UTC) Awaywithwords.ink (talk) 22:26, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. Thank you. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:57, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock-un|new username|reason=Username changed Niki tibble (talk) 08:49, 18 January 2018 (UTC)}[reply]

{unblock-un|new username|reason=Username changed Niki tibble (talk) 08:48, 18 January 2018 (UTC)}

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Niki tibble (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

new username (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Username changed Niki tibble (talk) 08:48, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Accept reason:

One unblock request at a time, please; you made three requests. As your username has changed, I have lifted your block. Before editing further, please read and understand WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. Specifically, edits about any freelance writing service may result in an immediate reblock, as that would be in violation of those policies. Yamla (talk) 13:02, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dan Poole (January 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JamesBWatson was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a classic example of trying to make a non-notable subject look notable by bombarding the draft with innumerable references without regard to their quality, as though mere number of references were a guarantee of notability. Many of the references barely mention the subject, such as merely including him in a list of credits, and at least one doesn't seem to mention him at all; others are not independent sources, and so on.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dan Poole and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dan Poole, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:25, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siubhan Harrison (April 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siubhan Harrison and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Siubhan Harrison, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

• Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]