User talk:Avidazadi

This is Avidazadi's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Azadi Network (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are no sources other than the organisation's own website. Please see the information in the box above and follow the links in the text, to understand the kind of sourcing that is necessary.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Azadi Network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 17:51, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Avidazadi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 17:51, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Azadi Network (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JBW was:

(1) The references cited in the draft do not come near to showing that the Azadi Network satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Some of them don't even mention the Azadi Network, and none of them is substantial coverage in an independent s0ource. (2) Even if citations to suitable sources can be provided, in its present form the draft is totally unsuitable to become an article because it is unambiguously promotional. A Wikipedia article needs to be written from a neutral point of view, but this draft is clearly written with the aim of giving the reader a favourable opinion of the Azadi Network.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Azadi Network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JBW (talk) 20:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Avidazadi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. JBW (talk) 20:34, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Azadi Network (November 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Azadi Network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:12, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Azadi Network, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Theroadislong (talk) 08:16, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Draft:Azadi Network. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Theroadislong (talk) 08:26, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 09:37, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Avidazadi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was trying to write a wiki page for first time, I wasn't familiar enough with the guidelines, then it required more links and citation as reference, I've been trying to add more links but apparently in a wrong way. I intend to add more links but this time based on Wikipedia's guidelines Avidazadi (talk) 10:46, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have no idea why you think it's the links that are the reason you are blocked and why you are ignoring the main reason, WP:COI and WP:PROMO. It looks like you are here to write about Azadi Network. You won't be unblocked to do so. Yamla (talk) 10:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Avidazadi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

I am writing to sincerely apologize for any issues caused by my edits and to respectfully request a reconsideration of my block. I understand now that my previous submissions did not fully adhere to Wikipedia's guidelines, particularly regarding conflict of interest (COI) and promotional content (WP-PROMO). I was not fully aware of the importance of these policies and now realize the critical role they play in ensuring Wikipedia remains a reliable and unbiased source of information.

If unblocked, I am committed to strictly following Wikipedia’s guidelines. I will take the following steps to ensure compliance:

Focus on Neutrality: I will avoid any language that may seem promotional or biased, ensuring that the content is strictly factual and based on neutral, third-party sources.

Use Reliable, Independent Sources: I understand the importance of using independent and reliable sources to verify the information. I will avoid any links or references to the organization’s official website or related primary sources within the main content.

Consult with Experienced Editors: Before making any future edits, I will seek advice from experienced editors and review relevant Wikipedia guidelines to ensure that my contributions align with community standards.

I genuinely want to contribute constructively to Wikipedia and have learned from this experience. Thank you for considering my request. I hope for the opportunity to demonstrate a clear understanding of Wikipedia's policies and to make useful, policy-compliant contributions in the future.

Respectfully, AvidAzadi

[ Avidazadi (talk) 12:17, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't consider chatbot written requests(66% certain according to zeroGPT). You are blocked, not a bot, so we want to hear from you. Please write in your own words without the aid of an AI or bot. 331dot (talk) 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Avidazadi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry if it seems I'm ignoring something which I'm not, since I received a block warning due to spam links! that's why I mentioned that. yes, I'm here to write about Azadi Network, during editing that I received two messages about lack of enough independent references and also lack of neutral tone in the text, now how can I overcome these when I'm block? how can I solve these problems? I would appreciate it if enlighten me! Avidazadi (talk) 11:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. 331dot (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new posts at the bottom, so they stay in order. This may be easier to do if you click "edit" and not "reply". 331dot (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Avidazadi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm so sorry for the mistakes and misunderstanding which I caused, I kindly request to unblock my user so I can correct the draft about Azadi Network based on wikipedia's guidelines. I appreciate your patience and support.

sincerely, Avidazadi Avidazadi (talk) 08:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This tells us nothing about this matter. We need you to specifically tell us what your mistakes were and what you will do differently. This should include describing any connection you have with Azadi Network per WP:COI and WP:PAID. You're running out of chances, so make the next request count. 331dot (talk) 09:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Again, please place requests at the bottom. Do not click "Reply", click "edit" at the top of this page or in the section header. The Reply function is imperfect and does not always work when posting at the bottom. 331dot (talk) 09:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]