User talk:Audreysaurus

July 2022

Hello Audreysaurus. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Audreysaurus. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Audreysaurus|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 07:44, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not being paid to do this! Audreysaurus (talk) 08:27, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is the nature of your conflict of interest? If you work for the company, you are a paid editor, you do not have to be specifically paid to edit. 331dot (talk) 10:27, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I work for the company Audreysaurus (talk) 03:15, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you work for the company, that counts as paid editing. You must make the required paid editing disclosure. 331dot (talk) 08:10, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you declared a COI, if you work for the company, you must make the stricter paid editing disclosure, a Terms of Use requirement. 331dot (talk) 07:45, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How do I do this? Audreysaurus (talk) 03:15, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Instructions are provided at WP:PAID, as well as on this page(see the post below this one). 331dot (talk) 08:11, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Audreysaurus, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Audreysaurus|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 08:13, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not being paid to do this! Audreysaurus (talk) 03:16, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wild Entertainment Group (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by 331dot were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We aren't interested in how the founder of the company describes the company. Any article about this company must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about it, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. This just summarizes the routine business activities of the company, which does not establish notability. Please read Your First Article. As a company representative, you may be too close to the company to write about it as Wikipedia requires- articles are typically written by independent editors wholly unconnected with the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wild Entertainment Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 07:47, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Audreysaurus! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 331dot (talk) 07:47, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wild Entertainment Group (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You've added some sources and content, but the tone and style of the article is unchanged. As I said, we aren't interested in how the founder of the company describes the company, or in a mere summary of company activities.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wild Entertainment Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 08:14, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Wild Entertainment Group

Hello, Audreysaurus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wild Entertainment Group, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wild Entertainment Group

Hello, Audreysaurus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Wild Entertainment Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:42, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]