User talk:Attilios/Archives4

Thanks but

I appriecate the info but there was no need to revert the whole page. Novadestin (talk) 03:35, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)

The July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:30, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject National Basketball Association/Los Angeles Lakers task force invite

Please accept this invitation to join the Lakers task force, a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with the Los Angeles Lakers. Simply click here to accept!

Replaceable fair use Image:Gaetano Scirea.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Gaetano Scirea.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Recent Edit

I reverted an edit I saw on Siurgus Donigala as it appeared to be vandalism. If I was wrong, please feel free to redo your edit. Dusti^SPEAK!! 15:44, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mosmof (talk) 02:24, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for you help

On the Theatre of Pompey article. I'm just a history buff with limited knowledge. I appreciate the contributions that make the article read better, be more accurate and help direct to the proper pages. THANKS!--Amadscientist (talk) 19:46, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:Image-Algermissen.jpg

Image:Image-Algermissen.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Wappen Algermissen.jpg. Commons is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image(s) will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Wappen Algermissen.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:16, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for July 28, August 9, 11 and 18, 2008.

Sorry I haven't been sending this over the past few weeks. Ralbot (talk) 05:33, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 31	28 July 2008	About the Signpost

Wikimania 2008 wrap-up	WikiWorld: "Terry Gross"
News and notes: Unblocked in China	Dispatches: Find reliable sources online
WikiProject Report: Military history	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Volume 4, Issue 32	9 August 2008	About the Signpost

Anthrax suspect reportedly edit-warred on Wikipedia	WikiWorld: "Fall Out Boy"
Dispatches: Style guide and policy changes, July	WikiProject Report: WikiProject New York State routes
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Volume 4, Issue 33	11 August 2008	About the Signpost

Study: Wikipedia's growth may indicate unlimited potential	Board of Trustees fills Nominating Committee for new members
Greenspun illustration project moves to first phase	WikiWorld: "George Stroumboulopoulos"
News and notes: Wikipedian dies	Dispatches: Reviewing free images
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Volume 4, Issue 34	18 August 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor: Help wanted
WikiWorld: "Cashew"	Dispatches: Choosing Today's Featured Article
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:33, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nuova Famiglia

Hi, there article which you created lacks any citations or references. Could you please do the needful? Thank you. Joyson Noel (talk) 11:04, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Pilote crumb cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Pilote crumb cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:21, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:VeniceDogeSuccession

Template:VeniceDogeSuccession has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Bazj (talk) 17:03, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kosuke JAP.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kosuke JAP.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:John_Ridgway.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:John_Ridgway.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 18:07, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films roll call and coordinator elections

Roll call and Coordinator nominations

It's that time of year again – we're wiping everyone's name off of the active members list and doing a project roll call. Your username is listed on the WikiProject Films participants list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:FILM editor, please add your name back to the Active Members list. You can also add your name to any of our many task forces!

It's also time to start the WikiProject Films coordinator selection process! We are aiming to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 08:03, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:30, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter

The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:29, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)

The August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:27, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re:Arab Crusade leaders

Hi mate, I don't think I'm the best person to help you on these two articles, as I'm not exactly knowledgeable in the area. Perhaps you should contact Roger Davies, a very kind and helpfull editor who appears to be knowledgeable in this area, or EyeSerene an experienced and reliable copyeditor. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 08:25, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have done some minor changes to the articles , but you did a good job Jim Sweeney (talk) 08:35, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Muslim commanders

I will look into after school today; at the moment, we are literally starting class, so I have to go. TomStar81 (Talk) 16:30, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I had a look and did a little copyeditting, on the whole though you did well with the translations. The only major issues were comma issues, which I have tried to address. I also added {{copyedit}} tags to the articles to get a second opinion on what may need to be done. TomStar81 (Talk) 21:29, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Luca —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.85.192.149 (talk) 12:15, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad al-Idrisi

I note that you removed an "unreferenced-section" tag from Muhammad al-Idrisi with the edit summary "OK". That paragraph was part of this edit, the rest of which was removed for copyright violation. (I got involved because I had previously spent an hour wikifying one of the same contributor's new articles, before it got deleted for copyvio.) This still includes the WP:PEACOCK sentence that "He was so remarkable that he was nicknamed the strobe of the Arabs" -- and I am not sure what the latter means anyway. If it is supported by the journal citations given at the foot of the article, please would you make in-line citations linking these claims to the supporting references? - Fayenatic (talk) 21:47, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for August 25 and September 8, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 35	25 August 2008	About the Signpost

WikiWorld: "George P. Burdell"	News and notes: Arbitrator resigns, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Dispatches: Interview with Mav
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Volume 4, Issue 36	8 September 2008	About the Signpost

Wikimedia UK disbands, but may form again	WikiWorld: "Helicopter parent"
News and notes: Wikipedian dies, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Featured topics	Dispatches: Style guide and policy changes, August
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 20:54, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - Piovano Arlotto

Hi - and congratulations! It would be good to have an English article on him. I guess you're busy, but let me know if you get anything started. All the best Johnbod (talk) 21:09, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Franco Sacchetti

Per cortesia, ho visto che hai fatto un edit in questa voce. Puoi darci un'occhiata? C'è un tizio croato che continua ad inserire un inesistente nome croato del Sacchetti non presente in Google e non citato in nessuna storia di Ragusa (fra l'altro, è perfino dubbio il fatto che Sacchetti sia nato a Ragusa in Dalmazia), oltre a cancellare il suo inserimento fra i poeti e novellisti italiani. Ho indicato il perché dei miei edits nella pagina di discussione con dovizia di citazioni, ed in cambio ne ho ricevuto una minaccia di blocco! Grazie e ciao.--151.48.56.101 (talk) 17:57, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Come volevasi dimostrare: Franco Sacchetti è ritornato ad essere un possibile Frane Saćetić, oltre a non essere più un poeta e un novelliere italiano. Tutto ad opera del signore croato di cui t'ho parlato.--151.48.44.208 (talk) 22:12, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dimenticavo: secondo alcuni è dubbia la nascita a Ragusa di Sacchetti e si ipotizza in alternativa Firenze. Avevo indicato questa possibilità, ma ovviamente chi ha iniziato questa mini edit war ha cancellato il riferimento a Firenze, debitanemte motivato con citazione di fonti.--151.48.44.208 (talk) 22:14, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:IASFM.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:IASFM.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 18:17, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The September 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please vote here by September 30!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:13, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:KC newspaper.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:KC newspaper.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 00:33, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Castelgrande-Stemma.gif

An image you uploaded, Image:Castelgrande-Stemma.gif, doesn't work. -- Suntag ☼ 18:43, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for September 15, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 37	15 September 2008	About the Signpost

Wikiquote checkuser found to be sockpuppeteer	WikiWorld: "Ubbi dubbi"
News and notes: Wikis Takes Manhattan, milestones	Dispatches: Interview with Ruhrfisch, master of Peer review
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:03, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anglo-Zanzibar War

Hi, I reverted your edit to the above article as it removed the explanatory footnotes section and created two headed sections for the references (which I think should all be in one section). Hope that was OK - Dumelow (talk) 13:48, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Emperor Conrad I

A tag has been placed on Emperor Conrad I, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jordan Timmins (talk) 20:15, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Nick Carter trio.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nick Carter trio.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:56, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Minturno-stemma.gif

An image you uploaded, Image:Minturno-stemma.gif, is not displaying correctly. -- Suntag ☼ 13:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:Minturno-stemma.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Minturno-stemma.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 22:24, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

Any reasons for the deletions you made here in the references section? --Fioravante Patrone en (talk) 20:37, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Massimiliano_Rosolino.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Massimiliano_Rosolino.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 18:25, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Atina-Stemma.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Atina-Stemma.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:21, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Pianeta-sconosciuto.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pianeta-sconosciuto.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 10:10, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)

The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:54, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

I noticed your recent edit to 2008 Formula One season, and your edit summary caught my attention. Looking through your contributions, I notice a slightly disturbing trend. Edit summaries such as this, this, this, and this, just from today. I understand that you are trying to make corrections to article. But insulting previous editors because of mistakes is not the proper way to handle this. Please do not continue to do this, and review Wikipedia's Civility policy as well. The359 (talk) 18:16, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao!

So good to hear from old friends! I looked over it and applied some minor touches. The tag was really an overstatement, as it is a rather good article - stub size considered, that is. Perhaps you may want to rephrase "costume analysis" - see my hidden comment in the text.

Btw, you may have noticed that I had spruced up Giuseppe Ungaretti. Another editor removed the article from the "Italian fascists" category where I had placed it - my knowledge of Ungaretti is quite limited, but I based myself on the fact that the man had signed a fascist manifesto, was recognized as a fascist before WWII and exposed as a fascist after WWII, and because, with "clinical" hindsight, saying that this was the case is not saying that much. To clarify my latter statement: Italian fascism was the least and, for long, the most liberal of 20th century totalitarianisms; it created an intellectual fashion which took hold of many seemingly intelligent people, but when it led them astray, it didn't lead them as far astray as being a Nazi, Stalinist or a Maoist. Yes, Italian fascism too is very objectionable, but the common fallacy according to which calling a [former] fascist activist a fascist is non-politically correct strikes me as an odd notion to carry on wikipedia. I mean, it would be wrong to list either George Bush or Osama bin Laden "fascists" - in such cases, it is a polemical POV term and nothing more -, but why should Ungaretti, who, as far as I can tell, voluntarily endorsed fascism as a grown-up in an era of political freedom, not be known for this aspect of his life as well (especially given that he is known as such to many Italian sources I had no trouble finding)? Is it because he was also a good writer? So were Marinetti, Malaparte, not to say Sartre, Heidegger and Eliade - a blunt mention of what these people did, even as a "political hobby", should be alright, shouldn't it?

(Incidentally, I'm doing reading on a completely different issue, that of avant-garde in 1920s Romania. Even a Contimporanul issue from the period, cited by one more recent source, casually mentions Ungaretti among a young generation of fascist writers/journalists.)

In any case, maybe I am missing something in the picture. That's why I thought it best to ask you to approve or disprove my argument and how it relates to Ungaretti, because this may be wider debate than I am capable of seeing at the moment, and yes, because I may be entirely wrong. Please lemme know one way or the other. Best, Dahn (talk) 10:04, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick response. I'm going to look into the other article (though I'm sure your French is better than my "understand-only" Italian), but now I have to be signing out - will do so next time around (say, tonight). I'm also going to elaborate on the Ungaretti issue on the article talk page, so I don't leave the other editor clueless about my rationale (s/he has been awaiting my reply on these issues for months now). Dahn (talk) 10:48, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on the Laclos article: it looks very good, and, from what I could see, there was nothing wrong with it. Dahn (talk) 16:49, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Whelan Apprentice.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Whelan Apprentice.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Scacchi e tarocchi.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Scacchi e tarocchi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 04:34, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template Substitution

Hi there, and thank you for using templates on Wikipedia. On one of your recent edits you used a template that should have been substituted but you did not subst it. Please subst templates that are meant to be substed in the future. Please take a look at Substitution to learn more about it. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you need any more help please ask me on my talk page. Thanks. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 13:23, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Civil behaviour

Although your contributions are welcome please refrain from edit summaries like common typo of Anglosaxon who are unable to copy properly what it is written which breach the WP:CIVIL guidelines. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 22:03, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:Provincial elections in Italy

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Provincial elections in Italy, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Provincial elections in Italy has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Provincial elections in Italy, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 08:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quick translation

Hello, Attilios. I did a quick search of WikiProject Italy and you were one of the first names to come up so I decided to ask you for a favor. On the International reaction to the 2008 United States presidential election article there are a list of responses from nations. I have found a response from San Marino, but unfortunately I do not speak Italian. Would you mind translating the first paragraph or so from this source? Here is the source = [1]. Please reply with translation (if you choose to do so) on my talkpage. Grazie! --Tocino 07:20, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. He is using complicated language. I think I understand what he's saying, except for the part about reformations policy. --Tocino 07:40, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

image loss

Hi,

due to a software problem the following images which you uploaded were lost on Wikimedia Commons (maybe except for a preview image):

Image:Accettura-Stemma.gif

If you still have this file on your hard disk or if you can recover it from other sources please upload it again.

Best regards, -- Ukko (talk) 10:01, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Insulting edit summaries

If you can't be more civil in your edit summaries, stop contributing. -- Logical Premise^Ergo? 15:33, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)

The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:25, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bad_Gandersheim-pt.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bad_Gandersheim-pt.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for November 17, 2008 and before.

Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 42	8 November 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor
News and notes: The Price is Right, milestones	Dispatches: Halloween Main Page contest generates new article content
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Volume 4, Issue 43	10 November 2008	About the Signpost

Fundraiser opens: Over $500,000 raised in first week	ArbCom elections: Nominations open
Book review: How Wikipedia Works	MediaWiki search engine improved
Four Board resolutions, including financials, approved	News and notes: Vietnamese Wiki Day
Dispatches: Historic election proves groundbreaking on the Main Page	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Volume 4, Issue 44	17 November 2008	About the Signpost

Lawsuit briefly shuts down Wikipedia.de	GFDL 1.3 released, will allow Wikimedia migration to Creative Commons license
Wikimedia Events Roundup	News and notes: Fundraiser, List Summary Service, milestones
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:20, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rouen

Hello!
You edited this page a couple of days ago, but I'm not sure from your edit history what you did. Have you moved the passage to a separate page? Or put it somewhere else? Or just deleted it? Moonraker12 (talk) 16:29, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know; I (at last!) put this stuff on its own page at Privilege of St Romain, but don't have any source for it. It was in the Rouen page for about 4 years (added anonymously on 26 feb 2004)! Moonraker12 (talk) 11:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lola Pagnani e Campora San Giovanni

Buonasera a te, ti scrivo nella nostra madrelingua. dunque avrei bisogno del tuo ottimo inglese per aggiornare il più presto possibile l'articolo sulla mia amica e sul paese che mi sopporta da 23 anni. Nel senso di un aggiornatina e correzioni varie. Per Campora puoi fare se puoi fare qualcosa all'istante. Per la prima ci manteniamo in contatto in questi giorni, in quanto mi deve arrivare la delibera dalla sua agenzia stampa. Per cortesia dunque potresi darmi questo aiuto, naturalmente se hai bisogno di una mano in campo geo-biografico fai pure, oppure posso aiutarti col calabro-siculo. Comunque una soluzione la troviamo. manteniamoci aggiornati. Ti ringrazio in anticipo!--Lodewijk Vadacchino (talk) 22:06, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Buongiorno di nuovo, se non sei impegnato poi iniziare i lavori di ristruttrazione. aspetto il contraccambio. ^___^!--Lodewijk Vadacchino (talk) 12:16, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Attilios ho visto che eri attivo e mi sono permesso di disturbarti, per favore potresti auitare un pochino questi due articoli? Grazie e scusa ancora una volta il Rompiscatole D'Europa.--Lodewijk Vadacchino (talk) 23:21, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of Image:1Stug_IIIH_75mm_by_Giovanni_Paulli.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1Stug_IIIH_75mm_by_Giovanni_Paulli.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:31, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cassin

Thanks for the edits on this article. I'm afraid that the wl that you made for Desio doesn't work though. Any idea how to make a wl work within square brackets - ie keeping the fact that Desio isn't mentioned by Cassin himself, who calls him 'he'? Cheers. Ericoides (talk) 17:21, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bianca Riario

Salve, I have noticed your work on the Bianca Maria Visconti article. I am also interested in the Sforza family and have created several articles on various Sforza women. The latest is Bianca Riario. Would you please be so kind as to look it over and see if you could perhaps add a bit more information. I notice that you are Italian. Most information on Bianca is in Italian. I live in Italy, and can read and speak Italian sufficiently, but some of the information on Bianca is hard to follow Thank you.--jeanne (talk) 17:44, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Attilios, thank you so much for your edits to the Bianca Riario article. It looks much better now. Don't you think we should leave the image of Caterina Sforza? At least until I can locate an image of Bianca which is free? I checked Commons but they dont have any images of her. The medallion of her would be good to use, if I could upload it to Commons. Thank you again for your help.--jeanne (talk) 12:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)

The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 15:55, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Palma

Hi! Please note Palma the Elder is just not correct in English - Palma Vecchio is normal. Same for Palma Giovane - see for example This is English usage, not Italian - please respect it! Don't tell me the names don't make sense in Italian either. Johnbod (talk) 14:30, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

English is its own language, and its usages are not "errors", even if they would be in Italian. You have to come to terms with this - no doubt Italian usage of English terms includes similar "errors", but that does not mean English people should start "correcting" them on Italian WP. Johnbod (talk)

My dear Attilios!

So nice to receive your friendly message! I was wondering if you were still somewhere on the planet! I have been working very hard at painting and so on, and have not had so much time to write.

I know you will not love me for this, but Johnbod is right. Palma Vecchio has been called by that simplified version of his name, in English, ever since the 18th or 19th century...so that is the customary use in English. Likewise Palma Giovane, also known as Jacopo Palma.

I suggest that you respect this silliness and bloodymindedness in the English, simply because you must respect the nation that gave the world football, the BBC and a law that says you are innocent unless proven guilty.

You could come to a nice agreement with Johnbod to have redirects from the Italian version of each name, I'm sure! Amandajm (talk) 01:15, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Melfi

Hi Attilios, back in 2006 you wrote in the Melfi article that the First Crusade was summoned there in 1089. I've just removed that because it is definitely not true, but I was wondering where you got that information from? A Lonely Planet travel guide for Melfi says the same thing, and since it was published in 2006 I thought maybe either you got it from them, or they took it from Wikipedia. (Another user is now attempting to use the Lonely Planet guide as a source to add that same info to the First Crusade article, which is what led me back to you.) Adam Bishop (talk) 04:50, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lesena

I cannot think what the English translation would be. Amandajm (talk) 09:15, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just editting your church articles, and I saw where you needed the right word. The term "compartment" can be used in a general way. The word "bay" is also applied to the space between two columns, or two pilasters, attached columns etc. In a church, a "bay" is the entire space, both wall space and three dimensional space, between two columns or piers. Amandajm (talk) 09:54, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The nave of this church is seven bays long.
The lower stage of this building has five bays, the arcade has 18 bays and the upper stage has eleven.

Yes, the application of that word is very much wider in English. We would say that a jewellry box is divided into compartments, and that the brain of a well-organised and pernicketty person was divided into compartments. Good work on the churches! There must be a pic somewhere of the centrally planned one. Amandajm (talk) 10:03, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Attilios! I'm glad that you and Johnbod are being nice and friendly! I will take a little look at your articles as well! You are doing a wonderful job. I keep getting into tedious long discussions when what I would rather be doing is writing useful stuff! Amandajm (talk) 11:10, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Girolamo Scag Is that the right name, or is there a letter missing? Amandajm (talk) 11:17, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Palepoli.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Palepoli.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reggio Emilia Stemma.gif

You deserve better than a template warning, but can you help fix the old public domain template used at File:Reggio Emilia Stemma.gif? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:46, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessments and a warning

I recently got onto the architecture project page and took a look at which buildings etc are rated "Top" priority. What I discovered was that lots of American architectural firms and 19th/20th century architects were rated "top", while a great many buildings of such high importance that they appear in every text book, were missing. My efforts were greeted with "What's the point? Why bother?" But I think that the assessments are a good way of identifying what work needs doing in certain areas. You are doing a wonderful job on Italy's fantastic churches. On the other hand, Attilios, art theft from Italian churches is rife, so unless you know a building is well protected, it is not a good idea to publish the location of small precious sculptures and paintings by very famous names. Amandajm (talk) 11:36, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Late here! It's about 11.00 pm by Eastern Daylight Saving Time. Yawn! I'll do the other one tomorrow! Amandajm (talk) 11:57, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Solaris Chichoni.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Solaris Chichoni.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:33, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Attilios, thank you for your helpful edits on the Taddea Visconti article. I agree that the list of all her 16 siblings was too ponderous. Auguri and Buon Natale.--jeanne (talk) 10:15, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have just completed another article-this time on Caterina Visconti, a younger sister of Taddea, who lived a far more interesting life. I even located an image of her which I uploaded to the page.--jeanne (talk) 18:42, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scotland Issue

Hello, Why shouldnt i be

Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom I would say that was better to end this dicussion --78.144.163.88 (talk) 15:57, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppet of indefinitely blocked editor. Checkuser requested. Cheers, This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 16:15, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rome

Sorry for not responding to your message. Rome is a beautiful city-in fact, it's one of my favourites. The people are so courteous and gentile. I have never been to Turin, but it must be interesting as it was once the capial of Italy under the Savoys. Thank you again for your edits on my Visconti-Sforza women articles. To me, the Viscontis and Sforzas were the two most interesting of all the Italian noble families, even more so than the De Medicis and Borgias. Auguri!--jeanne (talk) 13:08, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red Sonja Marvel Feature.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Red Sonja Marvel Feature.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 23:51, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Madonna_Cherubin_Mantegna.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Madonna_Cherubin_Mantegna.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:47, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Castelgrande-Stemma.gif

A tag has been placed on File:Castelgrande-Stemma.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:Castelgrande-Stemma.gif|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:35, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Castelmezzano-Stemma.gif

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Castelmezzano-Stemma.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:35, 3 January 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:35, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Castelfranco Veneto-Stemma.png

A tag has been placed on File:Castelfranco Veneto-Stemma.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:Castelfranco Veneto-Stemma.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:36, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009

Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 45	24 November 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor: 200th issue
ArbCom elections: Candidate profiles	News and notes: Fundraiser, milestones
Wikipedia in the news	Dispatches: Featured article writers — the inside view
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Volume 4, Issue 46	1 December 2008	About the Signpost

ArbCom elections: Elections open	Wikipedia in the news
WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System	Features and admins
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Volume 5, Issue 1	3 January 2009	About the Signpost

From the editor: Getting back on track
ArbCom elections: 10 arbitrators appointed	Virgin Killer page blocked, unblocked in UK
Editing statistics show decline in participation	Wikipedia drug coverage compared to Medscape, found wanting
News and notes: Fundraising success and other developments	Dispatches: Featured list writers
Wikipedia in the news	WikiProject Report: WikiProject Ice Hockey
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Terracina-capitolium.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Terracina-capitolium.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:59, 5 January 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 19:59, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Mitico!

Ciao Mitico? passate bene le feste? Avrei bisogno che tu aiutassi questo articolo: Gianluca Ramazzotti, è il comico del Bagaglino, ma è anche un eccellente attore di teatro. purtroppo io con l'inglese siamo ancora nemici. Mi potresti dare un' aiuto? Ti ringrazio in anticipo come sempre!--Lodewijk Vadacchino (talk) 13:41, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao di nuovo, per cortesia puoi vedere se ho scritto bene qualche suo cenno biografico? grazie ancora--Lodewijk Vadacchino (talk) 12:28, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)

The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:03, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS Questionnaire

As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:31, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Kloster Säben.jpg

File:Kloster Säben.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Kloster Saben.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Kloster Saben.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:23, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monterotondo-stemma.gif is now available as Commons:File:Monterotondo stemma.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:36, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Francesco II Mantova.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Francesco II Gonzaga.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:10, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Montelanico.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Montelanico.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:51, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 2	10 January 2009	About the Signpost

News and notes:Flagged Revisions and permissions proposals, hoax, milestones	Wikipedia in the news
Dispatches: December themed Main Page	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 18:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move of films with Italian titles

Please see this on WP:AN/I. (Despite the title, some of the films are Italian, not Spanish.) Ed Fitzgerald _{t / c} 04:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 3	17 January 2009	About the Signpost

News and notes: New board members, changes at ArbCom	Wikipedia in the news
Dispatches: Featured article writers—the 2008 leaders	WikiProject Report: WikiProject Pharmacology
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 23:16, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:SantaMariaaVico-Stemma.gif

Thanks for uploading File:SantaMariaaVico-Stemma.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:24, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New article on Italian celebrity

Salve Attilios, I have just created a stub on Maria De Filippi. As she is the most popular presenter on Italian TV at the moment, she deserved an article on Wikipedia. Don't you agree?--jeanne (talk) 10:53, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proofreading complete for Dario Bellezza (it --> en)

Hello!
I have completed the proofreading and revised the page above by adding a significant number of sources after some reading; since you contributed to it in the past, I invite you to take a look at it, and leave any comments, feedback or suggestions on the page's talk by starting a new section. I'll watch it for a few days.
Thanks! -- Campelli (talk) 00:56, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 4	24 January 2009	About the Signpost

Jimbo requests that developers turn on Flagged Revisions	Report on accessing Wikipedia via mobile devices
News and notes: New chapters, new jobs, new knight and more	Wikipedia in the news: Britannica, Kennedy, Byrd not dead yet
Dispatches: Reviewing featured picture candidates	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by 03:32, 25 January 2009 (UTC) at §hepBot (Disable)

Pope John Paul II

Hi Attilios, I am working on the Pope John Paul II article in order to improve it and raise it to ‘Good Article’ and hopefully ‘Featured Article’ status. The article is currently in Pier Review. I thought you might be interested. Kind Regards Marek.69 ^talk 05:07, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Attilios!

Happy New Year!

Today is Australia Day. In my town thousands of people have picnics on the beach or overlooking the boat harbour. There will be a big fireworks display. We really love our fireworks! I must go to bed soon as it is after midnight and I must take my brother out to lunch tomorrow. But I will look at your article first.

Thank you for the hugs! Amandajm (talk) 13:49, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are right of course, but you will have to admit that is is one of the most exquisite pieces of Gothic Revival architecture on the planet. Amandajm (talk) 13:59, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen pictures of Santa Maria del Regno before. It's a very balanced, well-proportioned and characteristic Romanesque facade. But it looks very stark and forbidding.

This cathedral, St Andrew's, was built by a young English architect Edmund Blacket who migrated in 1843. He had such a great understanding of English Gothic buildings that even though he was 10,000 miles from home, he could build a church that looked as if it had been lifted out of an English village and dumped down in Australia. The English do not realise that he was one of their greatest 19th century architects. None of his work is purely imitative. He always designed as if he was a true Medieval architect who had got lost in the wrong century. Amandajm (talk) 14:17, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've done Carrara! Good Work! I will leave the other one for now, as I am nearly falling off my chair! Ciao! Amandajm (talk) 14:32, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Sernio-Stemma.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Sernio-Stemma.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 19:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you'd like this!

;-)Amandajm (talk) 10:51, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Siracusa-Stemma.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Siracusa-Stemma.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:53, 30 January 2009 (UTC) --Skier Dude (talk) 06:53, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Castellaneta

Hello,
A translation request is still outstanding for the article above on the Italian translation project page. I see there was much work done by you a long while ago. Does this article still require proofreading? Thanks for letting me know on my talk page. -- Francesco Campelli (talk) 22:27, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, sì, è colpa mia... Nonostante la buona volontà faccio ancora fregnacce di questo genere quando correggo traduzioni strampalate... l'articolo aveva bisogno di molta, tenera attenzione, e confesso di non aver neanche notato i punti... in inglese, diciamo "egregious error" --- ;-) Francesco Campelli (talk) 23:15, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More Italian celebrities

Salve, I have recently created articles on Pamela Prati, Serena Autieri and Ricky Memphis (sua paesano! LOL), as well as Kledi and De Filippi.--jeanne (talk) 14:38, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clean-up on the articles. They look much tidier now. Grazie.--jeanne (talk) 15:12, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost, January 31, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 5	31 January 2009	About the Signpost

Large portion of articles are orphans	News and notes: Ogg support, Wikipedia Loves Art, Jimbo honored
Wikipedia in the news: Flagged Revisions, Internet Explorer add-on	Dispatches: In the news
WikiProject Report: Motto of the Day	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 21:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re Piero

Hi Attilios! I was just looking at Holy Conversation (Piero della Francesca). I think it would be better to move it to Brera Madonna. In English, most of the altarpieces that are "sacred conversations" are not known by that name. That is the way they are described. (not Holy Conversation). This painting is usually called either the Montefeltro Altarpiace or the Brera Madonna, with the latter being the most common. Amandajm (talk) 10:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So I moved it. Amandajm (talk) 10:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Television in Italy

Calling someone illiterate is not nice, m'kay, especially when you occasionally make spelling mistakes yourself, m'kay. FYI, I didn't write that piece, I just find this kind of behaviour hateful, definitely not what one would expect from a well-respected editor.--Piccolo Modificatore Laborioso (talk) 09:19, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bianca Riario and Tony Sperandeo

Ciao, I forgot to tell you that I've written articles on these two people as well. By theway, did you know that there's a video on YouTube where it shows that episode of Distretto de polizia when Mauro Belli is gunned down? I have seen it many times. A good piece of acting from Memphis and Giorgio Tirobassi.--jeanne (talk) 12:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of La Settimana enigmistica

A tag has been placed on La Settimana enigmistica, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it is an unneeded redirect to a stub

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -Zeus- 22:46, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

You need to wait for an admin to remove it, I think. -Zeus- 22:46, 5 February 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by -Zeus- (talk • contribs)

Attilios!

Why are you not commenting on the picture I posted on your page? It's a recreation of that church of your, before they stuffed around with it. Amandajm (talk) 22:58, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re Romanesque: OK! If you are going to do that, I'll help you out with the interpretation. I keep getting distracted. But I have been working through the Cathedrals of England, mainly doing the less demanding ones. I started in alphabetical order but when I got to Canterbury, I baulked, because it really is major. It has a complex history, and many different building stages so it requires a lot of writing. I's actually the cathedral with which I am the most familiar.

Anyway, I skipped it and went on to Durham which is very easy by comparison, even though it is large and one of the greatest buildings on the planet. I haven't finished it yet.

I also noticed that Florence Cathedral needed tidying up. so I am doing that concurrently. There is this misconcept in the mind of many simplistic editors that fails to perceive the essential links between things and divides them up as if they were not linked at all. There is a failure to perceive the three buildings at Florence as part of the same cathedral complex. One article for church, one for baptistry, one for campanile. Although each one is worthy of an article dealing with its architecture and decoration, the main article, on the duomo, needs to make it clear that the tower is the cathedral's tower and the baptistry is they cathedral's baptistry. Anyway, I'll write a little more about the architecture.

Amandajm (talk) 23:58, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

St Sava

My dear Attilios, Nona is going to come over there to Turin and track you down and wring your neck! You are so ruthless! I have for many many weeks tried to get one of those Serbian people from to provide the answers to what a particular string of names were. As soon as someone did as they were asked, you deleted the lot! The information is useful, but it needed abreviation. Now we have more idea as to the architectural setting in Belgrade. I am going to thank her or him, and say that it was deleted in error, because it was in a box. Your comment was too rude! I thought it was only me who was so rude!

Amandajm (talk) 14:50, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is what I was referring to! There was this long sentence that didn't make sense, and I had finally got someone to make sense of it, and chop! The Axe-man comes in and it is gone! But It is back, shorter and in a sentence, and I have thanked the person who providied the information... so leave it for now.

I will look at Pavia Cathedral. But I'm too tired, as it is very late! I can't sleep very well, when the weather is so hot.

The fires have been terrible, with many people killed. They will probably go for many more days, unless there is heavy rain, which is unlikely. Luckily there have been no severe fires near us yet. Amandajm (talk) 15:45, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply from the PlastikSpork

Hello, Attilios. You have new messages at Plastikspork's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Fair use rationale for File:Magicovento001.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Magicovento001.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chillum 02:00, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Policy on Galleries

Hello, Attilios. I noticed your recent edit to Basilica of San Lorenzo, Milan, including the comment "Per new Wikipedia policy, Gallery must be referred to at Commons". As an editor who has occasionally implemented or "fixed up" a Gallery as a way of improving space usage on pages that have a lot of images, it would be helpful for me to better understand that policy. Could you be so kind as to provide a link or two to a location where it is discussed? Thanks! Lini (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 6	8 February 2009	About the Signpost

News and notes: Elections, licensing update, and more	Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's future, WikiDashboard, and "wiki-snobs"
Dispatches: April Fools 2009 mainpage	WikiProject Report: WikiProject Music
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 21:26, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I noticed that you deleted my edit Revert to revision 263783720 dated 2009-01-13 10:56:49 by 190.21.64.251 using popups without any explanation. As my edit was valid and easily checked, I can not understand reasons for your action. Can you please explain it, because, to me it does not make any sense. Guarda, non si puo annulare senza guardare. Ciao --Lasta (talk) 14:48, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Adolph II of the Marck, Bishop of Liège

A tag has been placed on Adolph II of the Marck, Bishop of Liège requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Saluti

Ho visto che hai risistemato la grotta di Nereo. Già che ci sono ti saluto e magari ti chiedo di darmi una mano ad inserire varie altre voci in particolare su alcune grotte che hanno una certa importanza scientifica, vedi la grotta dei Cervi, che ho scoperto nel '95 e che puoi consultare su it.wikipedia. Non ho molto tempo e pratica anche perchè il mio inglese non è perfetto. Abbiamo dei rapporti molto stretti con molti club subacquei in UK e tutti i vari amici e responsabili di club mi chiedono di inserire le pagine ovviamente nella loro lingua. Nel caso mandami un messaggio. Ciao--Abyssadventurer (talk) 10:44, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. DefenseSupportParty (talk) 09:54, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

I reverted an edit I saw on Siurgus Donigala as it appeared to be vandalism. If I was wrong, please feel free to redo your edit. Dusti^SPEAK!! 15:44, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009

Volume 5, Issue 7

Weekly Delivery

2009-02-16

From the editor — A new leaf

Commons Picture of the Year
Picture of the Year 2008 begins voting

News and notes
Flagged Revisions, historical image discovery, and more

In the news
Political tiff, error repeated in press, predictions of doom

Dispatches
How busy was 2008?

WikiProject report
WikiProject Gaelic games

Discussion report
Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations

Features and admins
Approved this week

Technology report
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Arbitration report
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist.
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 06:02, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:P p pasolini.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:P p pasolini.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Viapaolofabbri.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Viapaolofabbri.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 08:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New article

Salve, I have added another Italian actor to Wikipedia. I decided to create an article on Francesco Benigno after seeing him perform last night on the Sanremo Music Festival. Great actor. He was wonderful in Ragazzi Fuori.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 19:25, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edit. You don't think it necessary to mention his character Natale Sperandeo?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 21:03, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ongoing POV shift on Silvio Berlusconi

Hi, I noticed that you too have been editing and revertng changes in this page. I feel there is an ongoing large scale celebrative POV shift by an IP (which is also very active in the italian wikipedia). This editor works very hard and it is impossible for a normally active user to control and correct all his POV shifts. I think something should be made to stop this kind of editing. What can we do? Maybe we should try to ask some administrator to protect the page?--pokipsy76 (talk) 12:03, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of {{unreferenced}} tag from Raoul Bova

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Raoul Bova. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 18:35, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revert? Why?

Please carefully and clearly explain teh reasons for teh revert you did on my art in Assisi section. The material was fully relevant and should remain. Thank you. History2007 (talk) 12:19, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not so fast caro amico. Exactly where was the POV? Is Lorentzeti not a master? Is Simone Martini not a painter? Are the frescos not there? Where is the personal POV? Please clarify that before reverting. rest assured that if I have to add 30 pages of references. I will keep that material there. Certamente... History2007 (talk) 12:39, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amelia-Stemma.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Amelia-Stemma.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 21:54, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:

Philosophers analyze Wikipedia as a knowledge source
An automated article monitoring system for WikiProjects
News and notes: Wikimania, usability, picture contest, milestones
Wikipedia in the news: Lessons for Brits, patent citations
Dispatches: Hundredth Featured sound approaches
Wikiproject report: WikiProject Islam
Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 01:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ragazzi Fuori

Ciao, Attilios. Well, I have finally created an article for the film Ragazzi Fuori. What do you think of it?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 08:54, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cathedral

G'day! I notice you just deleted the gallery from that article. That should be just fine..... except that it won't be! Now all the people who have happily added to the gallery will jam their photos into the article instead. They will stuff up the formatting. They will not match the accompanying text. They will drive me up the wall! These are the reasons why I have been very tolerant of that gallery!

Yours truly

Amandajm (talk) 10:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ceva-Stemma.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ceva-Stemma.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:02, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gonars-Stemma.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gonars-Stemma.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:23, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Grazie. I had forgotten that Italian film titles are not capitalised after the first word. While I knew that ZEN was on the outskirts of North Palermo, I didn't know it was spelled with capital letters. I assumed it was spelled Zen. Thank you for your help.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 11:21, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for assisting me with ZEN. It needed it's own aricle as many articles in Wikipedia refer to it.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 08:04, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alessandro Di Sanzo

Attilios, do you think I should create a stub for Alessandro Di Sanzo?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 10:01, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He was the actor who played the part of Mery.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 10:11, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just created it. It's just a stub, but what do you think of it?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 10:37, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert my edit?

I'm curious to know why you removed the edit I made here. All I did was move somethings around and added additional infrmation. --Ted87 (talk) 13:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Xiuhtecuhtli - no aut template

Hi Attilios - just a quick query as to why the {{aut}} template shouldn't be used - it's widely used in Wikiproject Mesoamerica articles, which is where I've picked up the habit. Best regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 16:07, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I'll post this to the Wikiproject Mesoamerica discussion board for some 3rd party feedback. Best regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 22:06, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

Books extension enabled
News and notes: Stewards, Wikimania bids, and more
Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's role in journalism, Smarter Wikipedia, Skittles
Dispatches: WikiProject Ships Featured topic and Good topics
Wikiproject report: WikiProject Norse History and Culture
Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 07:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pier Paolo Pasolini.

Attilios, pray tell, why have you reverted my addition of the categories "Italian communists", "Italian Marxists", and "Marxist journalists"?

The Wikipedia article on Pasolini clearly identifies him as Marxist and a journalist. There is even a whole section on his adherence to communist beliefs. The cateogry "Italian communists" is separate from "Members of the Italian Communist Party", and the category pages clearly distinguish between these.

Clearly these categories are pertinent - after all, they are notable enough to be implicitly written into the biographical article itself.

Thanks, 209.183.32.47 (talk) 21:43, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Matthias Corvinus

Why did you delete the picture of Hunyad Castle in Matthias Corvinus article? It was the place, where the young Matthias grew up. --Celebration1981 (talk) 15:16, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup on History of Hungary

Thanks, you did a great job. That article is really muddled, and needs all the help it can get. - TheMightyQuill (talk) 20:10, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you hate Hungarians? Why did you delete important sentences? Forexample: King Coloman and witches? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.111.185.112 (talk) 09:18, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:29, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mölgg

Hi Attilios; have you read my post on the talkpage? I wrote to the homepage to ask what the correct name is and the answer was Mölgg. and that the spelling variation Moelgg is used for communications purposes. Now, if we have an email by the official homepage stating that the correct name is Mölgg and the Province of Bolzano-Bozen says there are 0 persons living in the province with the name Moelgg (you can check for all names in the province through this link [2]) I suggest you move the articles back to their correct spelling, namely: Mölgg. --noclador (talk) 14:14, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops - I saw your post on the talkpage of Manfred Mölgg only after I wrote the above. first: thanks for the compliment about the crests I drew. second: the email came from @moelgg.com and it explained that the name change is because the FIS "on principle does not permit the use of vowel mutations" in its lists. The official homepage is at moelgg.com because you can not register a top level domain with ö ä ü and the like. I wrote to the homepage, because being from the province I was surprised that some people think that the name is spelled Moelgg - I do not know of anyone who spells this name here in that way. I checked with the provincial name database and there is not a single person registered here with the name Moelgg, but 139 with the name Mölgg ([3] enter the name Mölgg and click on "Suche" to see the results). After I saw that I wrote the homepage of the two to ask what the correct spelling is and as I suspected they use Moelgg for communication reasons (I believe only German layout keyboards have the ä ö ü and ß letters). Therefore I moved the articles today to the correct spelling Mölgg (which also must be on the twos carta d'identita, because the provincial name list is based on the carta d'identitas handed out by the communes). I let you now decide how to proceed. --noclador (talk) 14:24, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yes, it surprises me too that they use Moelgg in the German language section of their official homepage - my suspicion is that they do so to be consistent with the English and Italian spelling of their name. As for your theory that they are Ladin: I do not know if they are, but they are from and live both in one of the Ladin communes: Mareo - so they might be Ladin, although the provincial names database shows that the highest number of Mölgg live in the German speaking Valle Aurina (so they might have moved from there across the Val Pusteria to the Val Badia). But as they would have to get their carta d'identita from the commune of Mareo (which is 93.30% Ladin) and the bureaucracy there is almost entirely Ladin (Per legge 93,30% dei impiegati del comune di Mareo devono essere Ladini), I think that the name was not Germanized but is really Mölgg (which is also the version of the name used int he Ladin weekly La Usc di Ladins [4]).

I did already start to create articles about Italian regiments and battalions :-) User:Noclador#Alpini Project (sono un vecio del 4° Alpini ReCom di Bolzano). All articles about the Alpini on the English wiki (and most of the articles about the Italian Army brigades on the German wiki are from me). My aim is to to bring Alpini to featured article status. Annoyingly a lot of my time is taken by the constant discussion on the South Tyrolean naming disputes (two nationalists created havoc all over the articles there i.e. they tried to rename the "Neue Südtiroler Tageszeitung" (New South Tyrolean Daily into (New Daily for the province of Bolzano-Bozen) in their campaign to get rid of the name South Tyrol...) so although my main interest is to create a a perfect and wide ranging Alpini article realm I am only advancing at a slow pace... i.e. in the Alpini article only the sections Alpini#1872 to 1887 and Alpini#1888 to 1914 are finished... the rest is still to be done (I'm alone in this work...); next up: 1915-1918 plus a detailed article about the Alpine front in WWI :-) --noclador (talk) 15:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Swedish wiki has asked me to forward the email to them and has put it in the OTRS system to confirm the spelling: [5] - have you thought about what to do on the English wiki? --noclador (talk) 20:21, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you have nothing to say anymore I will move the names tonight to the correct Mölgg. --noclador (talk) 16:00, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

you want a comment by them??? First they are not brothers, but siblings, second: we have an email by their homepages webmaster, who says the use of Moelgg is for communication reasons and the correct name is Mölgg, then we have the Ladin newspaper using only the name Mölgg; another example: the Maratona dles Dolomites in which the Mölgg races every year uses also the name Mölgg[6] - La Maratona is an event organized by Ladins from Alta Badia. The provincial database doesn't know anyone with the name Moelgg, but lots of Mölgg and on top of that: when the Province of Bolzano-Bozen sends out a press statement in Ladin they use the name Mölgg[7] the name Mölgg is also used when the province sends out a press statement in Italian[8][9] and on top of that: his ski sponsor uses the name Mölgg in its English site[10]. The name is Mölgg and I am moving now the pages, because any further discussion will only and always point to the same conclusion: It is Mölgg! --noclador (talk) 06:30, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor

I'm not aware of such discussion. Can you point me to it? -- Kendrick7^talk 19:19, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have confused dates (i.e. 1 January) with years. -- Kendrick7^talk 01:22, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinator Elections

Nominations for Coordinator positions in the Military History WikiProject have commenced, and voting will begin on March 14, 2009. Make sure to get involved and ask questions to the candidates. Nominations for Coordinators goes until March 13. Then come out for the voting which begins on March 14. Thanks and Have a Great Day! Lord R. T. Oliver ^{The Olive Branch} 00:05, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:08, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Saladin GA...

Greetings Attilios! I've noticed you're a substantial contributor to the Saladin article and I was hoping we and other editors could collaborate to make it a Good article by say... the middle of next month? I haven't dealt in medieval biographies, so any help would be great. Right now I'm starting/expanding the time between his education and viziership in Egypt. Cheers! --Al Ameer son (talk) 04:48, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

News and notes: Commons, conferences, and more
Wikipedia in the news: Politics, more politics, and more
Dispatches: 100 Featured sounds milestone
Wikiproject report: WikiProject Christianity
Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing

There is nothing to be gained by changing "Tuscan" to "Italian" and back in the Galileo article. Only edit the same if you can make a point of fact or one about the theory of relativity, for instance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.207.21 (talk) 13:33, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unsubscribe · Single-page · Full edition »

— 16 March 2009

News and notes: License update, Commons cartoons, films milestone, and more
Wikipedia in the news: Manufactured scandal, Wikipedia assignments, and more
Dispatches: New FAC and FAR appointments
Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:03, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Gialloenna.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gialloenna.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:38, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:11, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of gallery at Cologne–Frankfurt high-speed rail line

I see you've removed the gallery on this article, because galleries must apparently be consulted at commons. What does this mean? And surely it's better to leave the gallery in but flag the requirement on the talk page or even begin whatever process is required at commons. I didn't create this gallery, but am curious because I might want to do this on other articles. --Bermicourt (talk) 09:21, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would grateful for your help here. Thanks. --Bermicourt (talk) 13:06, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In a nutshell (I have just restored some galleries also), a simple misunderstanding.

General policy is that galleries are always inappropriate in short articles ("Wikipedia is not an image gallery"), and in such cases they are best moved to Commons (revamping is only an option in longer articles)

But for longer articles, and to illustrate the text, galleries on Wikipedia are OK "where a collection of images can illustrate aspects of a subject that cannot be easily or adequately described by text or individual images".

Which - as per "adequately" - could apply here: an overview of the line cannot adequately presented by in-text images due to layout constraints. But the gallery needs revamping: the map as first image is rather nice but might go in-text above the gallery, and the gallery should run from Cologne to Frankfurt Central Station (or the other way around), presenting notable features directly related to the rail line. E.g. tunnels, bridges, stations, but probably not File:Main 08 2006 140.jpg (that could go into a gallery at Bundesautobahn 3 though). And the images should be presented in the proper sequence, i.e. as they would be encountered by a traveller.

As a rule-of-thumb:

Galleries are cool in Wikipedia,

if the article is already better than Start-class, and
if the gallery content is directly relevant to some text paragraph's content, and
if 4 or more images are needed to illustrate a paragraph of text or if for some other reason (e.g. layout) the images cannot be placed alongside the text.

Otherwise, galleries belong to Commons. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 18:20, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

E.g. Oriental Turtle Dove is what I would just barely consider OK... the second pic is quite useful, the others not so, so at face value it should not stand. But it improves layout quite a bit, so it is more helpful than disruptive. If it had like 3 rows of such images, I would mercilessly  it (not delete, that is too harsh!) and let someone from the Commons crew deal with it.

Wikipedia Signpost: 23 March 2009

From the editor: Reviewing books for the Signpost
Special report: Abuse Filter is enabled
News and notes: Flaggedrevs, copyright project, fundraising reports, and more
Wikipedia in the news: Alternatives, IWF threats, and more
Features and admins: Approved this week
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 03:43, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Buscaglia CE.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Buscaglia CE.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:29, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Ciriaco De mita.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ciriaco De mita.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:00, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Totila1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Totila1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:44, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Crema duomo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Crema duomo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:04, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:CrepaxG.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:CrepaxG.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:37, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 30 March 2009

From the editor: Follow the Signpost with RSS and Twitter
Special report: Community weighs license update
News and notes: End of Encarta, flagged revisions poll, new image donation, and more
Wikipedia in the news: Censorship, social media in schools, and more
Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:45, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Samarcanda Vecchioni.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Samarcanda Vecchioni.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading.STBotI (talk) 12:21, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your uploads

Good day. I see that you have uploaded a number of images to Wikipedia. First off, thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, there are some guidelines that we need to follow with copyrighted images. Specifically, you need to add a source for the image (a link to a website will do), a copyright tag (there are some listed at WP:ICT), and a rationale explaining why we can use a copyrighted image (explained at WP:NFURG). I see that your images fail to include one of these. Please stop uploading images and address the concerns listed above. If you need assistance, you can ask at the help desk. If you do not fix these images, and you continue to make bad uploads, you will be blocked and your images will be deleted. Thanks for your contributions! STBotI (talk) 12:21, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Treviglio

Grazie per l'aiuto! Non sono molto pratico della wikipedia in inglese benché abbia raggiunto un discreto livello con quella italiana. Vorrei portare la versione in inglese di Treviglio in vetrina come ho già fatto per quella italiana. Che ne dici di Darmi una mano?! --Simauer (talk) 17:34, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)

The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:56, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Centuripe-Stemma.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Centuripe-Stemma.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:44, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alberto Moravia

Is Cedric Kahn's film L'Ennui not a film adaptation of Alberto Moravia's La Noia?Sayerslle (talk) 00:11, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HSBC Trinkaus

I realise that Wikipedia's preferred style is not to use lists, but in the case of chronologies, I tend to prefer them because of the risk to precision that literary style poses. I have found that when people convert lists to paragraphs, they have a tendency to replace repetitive phrases such as "In 1960..." with constructions such as "A few years later,..." The result is a loss of information. I tend to favor the retention of information over aesthetics or the perfection of form. Acad Ronin (talk) 11:24, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 6 April 2009

Special report: Interactive OpenStreetMap features in development
News and notes: Statistics, Wikipedia research and more
Wikipedia in the news: Wikia Search abandoned, university plagiarism, and more
Dispatches: New FAC and FAR nomination process
WikiProject report: WikiProject China
Features and admins: Approved this week
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 13 April 2009

License update: Licensing vote begins
News and notes: WMF petitions Obama, longer AFDs, UK meeting, and more
Dispatches: Let's get serious about plagiarism
WikiProject report: WikiProject Color
Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 15:58, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

) they referred to cr 42 I think.... anyway o saw such micro events in other pages... are you going to clean all them up? Or only those where the aerial monuments of Raf are not in shining light? :)

Anyway, thanks for wishes... regads from Roma! gian piero --Gian piero milanetti (talk) 12:38, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

)Sì ma grazie a dio non sono tutti appiattiti a fare il tappetino ai loro apparecchi... io le frasi più lusinghiere sui piloti e i mezzi italiani li ho trovati su libri scritti da anglo-americani o tedeschi... devo dire che tranne nel caso del Mustang dove mi hanno cancellato una citazione dall'opera de agostini in cui si parlava di 58 abbattimenti di mustan da parte della anr (forse discutibile, ma comunque una citazione), non mi hanno cancellato niente... tu sei il primo!!!

ti prego fermati qua!! Se va bene a loro!!tu scrivi di aerei anche in wikipedia italiana? --Gian piero milanetti (talk) 13:04, 15 April 2009 (UTC) gian piero[reply]

Argentine Navy

No worries, I hate having to revert good faith edits but I looked and looked and just couldn't find where the mistake crept in. I guess a square bracket was missing but I just couldn't see it. Thanks for fixing it. Justin talk 08:43, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BTW a question, why did you remove the Spanish language equivalent to the Falklands War on the Rio Gallegos article? Just for information I went to some trouble to ensure both languages were represented on linked articles; in part to prevent the usual nationalist vandalism it attracts. Justin talk 12:41, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't disagree, however, it simply results in nationalist POV pushers disrupting the article. Justin talk 21:22, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Saluti da Campora San Giovanni

Ciao Attilios....come andiamo??? sono stato assente tanto....sempre nella mio paesello natale....diventato adesso una specie di Vaticano....non dico caro mio....il 15 gennaio 2009 è cambiata la mia vita.....un salto di qualità.....Facebook mi ha cambiato la vita......Ho incontrato un ciclone....un amore grande che ha cambiato tutto in me....mi ha reso maturo e ha dato la forza di combattere e di andare lontano con le mie parole.......una ragazza venezuelana che ho amato, amo e adesso è parte integrante della mia vita....lontani.....ma vicini.....adesso ho fatto di Campora San Giovanni un paese nuovo...quel paesello piccolo piccolo che ha avuto una rivoluzione....adesso questo piccolo borgo ha un processo di modernizzazione e sguardo verso il futuro..ho molto da fare e andare lontano.....Ti prego se puoi aiutarmi visto che adesso ho l'inglese arruginito...le nuove modifiche che ho apportato...ti ringrazio....A Buon Rendere sempre....--Lodewijk Vadacchino (talk) 20:35, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Empoli-Stemma.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Empoli-Stemma.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:16, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ferrara-Stemma.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ferrara-Stemma.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:36, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 20 April 2009

Book reviews: Reviews of The Wikipedia Revolution
Wikipedia by numbers: Wikipedia's coverage and conflicts quantified
News and notes: New program officer, survey results, and more
Dispatches: Valued pictures
WikiProject report: WikiProject Film
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:05, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Presentation of references

Hi Attilios. I've reversed the unheralded reference formatting changes you'd recently done, to Huitzilopochtli and a couple of other related articles. They were intentionally presented that way, for clarity and greater ease of picking out entries in a biblio list format. There is no single mandated 'correct' reference presentational style to enforce here, that I am aware of. There are at least four or five different methods in operation (per WP:CITE#HOW); that is, methods over-and-above the de facto standard of haphazard presentation, or no presentation at all. That formatting is but a minor departure from the WP:CITESHORT method. If it's not commonly done that way, then that's more because it's uncommon for any thought to be given to layout, readability, and how a reference/bibliography is actually used—by looking up keywords (ie authors' names) in an ordered listing.

I see no issues with that style; there are featured articles that use it. It's an improvement over the usual undifferentiated and unhelpful mess. If you think any changes need making to some cite/referencing style already established in some article, it might be best to raise it on relevant talkpg first. Regards, --cjllw ʘ TALK 08:27, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Attilios, thanks for your replies at my talkpg.

Re lists and bullets: afraid I don't see where in the MOS it dictates that bullet markers must always be used, either at MOS:LIST or elsewhere. Indeed, in the List styles section several different example types of lists are given, some without bullet markers. In any case, following the overarching MOS general principles for styles and formats, these need only be consistently applied within articles, not necessarily between them; sensible departures from MOS guidelines/suggestions are perfectly fine and any departures on their own are insufficient grounds to alter a deliberate chosen style from one to the other, without consensus.

As for why in this particular case bullet markers are not desirable- the reasons are twofold (although technically speaking, the colons are bullet markers, just 'invisible' ones—they generate underlying HTML code as list elements in the same way that an asterisk [*] or hash [#] does).

Firstly, a bibliography is not a run-of-the-mill list, although it technically may be a list. Since the chosen style uses hanging indents to offset the bibliography elements one from the other, using bullet markers also to do this would be redundant. The indentation is the bullet marker, if you prefer.

Second reason is a technical one. It so happens that browsers treat bullets differently, wrt to how they align the bullet marker with the indentation level. MSIE moves the bullet marker to the right if this indent is applied, whereas Firefox, Opera etc do not. So if we're using indents, when viewed in an MSIE browser the bullet gets shifted hard up against the first character of the text (or even, appears inside the text), which is not a good look (other browsers can cope with this kind of layout). Since a great many folks use MSIE, it's best to just make the bullet marker invisible (which is what the colon [:] does), and the output then looks the same across browsers. As mentioned, the hanging indent already does the job of providing a demarcation between each element, so visible bullet markers aren't needed anyway.

Hope that explains things. I have reset all those now again to the chosen presentation format. Thanks for your attention anyway. Best, --cjllw ʘ TALK 06:28, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Galleries

Attilios, see WP:IG - recently revised. Cheers. Johnbod (talk) 21:26, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Caravagio cardsharps

Hi Attilios. Could you look again at that article? I don't think it's chaotic crap at all - it's a schematic account of the work's provenance, useful info perhaps to someone. (I didn't write it by the way - I just keep an eye on Caravaggio articles). PiCo (talk) 12:09, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piazza del Popolo Piranesi.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Piazza del Popolo Piranesi.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:19, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re:infoboxes

Hi. As part of the goals of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers project "To ensure that every article biography related to film uses Template:Infobox actor and an image if possible. Please try to place the infobox in all film bio articles." Thanks. Lugnuts (talk) 13:42, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Take it up with the project then. Lugnuts (talk) 13:46, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sources

Hi Attilios, with edit you seemed to be annoyed that the article you created was tagged as unreferenced. Your solution (naming the reference) was excellent of course, but as I do a lot of newpage patrolling, or at least used to, I was wondering what you thinks I should have done instead of tagging the article. If you object to it, then there must be others too, and I'm not here to annoy people, so any hints you could give me would be welcome. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:33, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 27 April 2009

Book reviews: Reviews of Lazy Virtues: Teaching Writing in the Age of Wikipedia
News and notes: Usability study, Wiki Loves Art, and more
Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia Art dispute, and brief headlines
WikiProject report: Interview on WikiProject Final Fantasy
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:52, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

World War 2 Italian Divisions

Thanks I am trying to create articles for all the WW2 Italian Divisions Template:Italian Divisions World War II could you check for any other errors like the Forlì --Jim Sweeney (talk) 08:36, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Battiato la voce del padrone front 88.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Battiato la voce del padrone front 88.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Era cinghiale battiato.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Era cinghiale battiato.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:07, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Arca battiato.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Arca battiato.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:08, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Fisiognomica.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Fisiognomica.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:09, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Diecistrat.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Diecistrat.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:10, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Buzzelli rivolta2.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Buzzelli rivolta2.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:06, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Battiato orizzonti.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Battiato orizzonti.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Edvard Fortunatus, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 03:55, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't remove information

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sorghaghtani Beki, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.

The relevant edit is particularly troubling, because it came with a misleading edit summary of "rv chaos", where it didn't revert anything and there was no chaos at all. --Latebird (talk) 23:13, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)

The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:25, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Provinze of Bolzano templates

If you don't agree with the new template, you should not just restore the old one with the claim "restored clearer template" a) the map is a lot clearer as to where a village is located b) dark map? then lodge a request to brighten it up at the map team of the German wikipedia as others already have requested that the maps colors be better differentiated and as for these removal of content: [11], [12] and [13] what did you think there??? --noclador (talk) 20:44, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think about a map like this: commons:File:Karte Gemeinde Thun 2007.png would that be ok for you? --noclador (talk) 09:53, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As for the population graphs - where they have been missing I added them (now all the comuni of the province have them) and as for updating - I went to the University of Innsbruck and got the data from 1880 and 1910 and have begun to add them to all the comuni (the data from 1900 seems to be lost). Also the census is only done every 10 years in province so an update in 2011 and 2021 shouldn't be an impossible task for all us wikipedians :-)

As for the map: I lodged a request with the wiki map team to include a national map as with the Swiss locator maps. --noclador (talk) 12:40, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 11 May 2009

News and notes: Wikimania 2010, usability project, link rot, and more
Wikipedia in the news: Quote hoax replicated in traditional media, and more
Dispatches: WikiProject Birds reaches an FA milestone
WikiProject report: WikiProject Michael Jackson
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 21:30, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Limitations of cite tag

Hi, try not to use the {{cite | tag for complex sources (e.g. as in Gastornis). It creates longer and more unwieldy code that is hard to read compared to when you format it manually. Also, it is ambiguous as regards East Asian author names, and cannot handle most exceptions such as multilanguage papers and multilinks. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 03:22, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Theorius campus.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Theorius campus.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Venditti orso.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Venditti orso.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:07, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Venditti cose della vita.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Venditti cose della vita.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:08, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Venditti NAtale.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Venditti NAtale.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:09, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 18 May 2009

From the editor: Writers needed
Special report: WikiChemists and Chemical Abstracts announce collaboration
Special report: Embassies sponsor article-writing contests in three languages
News and notes: Wiki Loves Arts winners, Wikimania Conference Japan, and more
Wikipedia in the news: Arbitrator blogs, French government edits, brief headlines
WikiProject report: WikiProject Opera
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:31, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit conflicts

Doesn't the Wiki software give you the chance to write over any edits that have been made in the interim? It always gives me that option... --User:AlbertHerring ^{Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla!} 20:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hrmm...that's odd. You're about the third or fourth person to mention that to me - I thought it was an option for everyone. What skin do you use?

As to those 150 edits, I have AWB...so I'll look at closing that gap some this weekend. ;-) --User:AlbertHerring ^{Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla!} 20:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 25 May 2009

License update: Licensing vote results announced, resolution passed
News and notes: New board member, flagged revisions, Eurovision interviews
Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia: threat or menace?
WikiProject report: WikiProject LGBT studies
Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:15, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009

From the editor: Browsing the archives
Book review: Review of The Future of the Internet
Scientology: End of Scientology arbitration brings blocks, media coverage
News and notes: Picture of the Year, Wikipedia's first logo, Board elections, and more
Wikipedia in the news: Tamil Wikipedia, Internet Watch Foundation, and more
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:05, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Voltaggio (AL)-Stemma.png

Thank you for uploading an image or media.

Whilst, the image or media appears to be licensed, It would be helpful if you could confirm the photographer, author or copyright owner of the media concerned, has granted release under the licenses shown. You can do this by getting them to make a formal release,or by confirming any permission you obtained, by writing to the OTRS permissions queue as detailed in WP:COPYREQ.

If you have already approached OTRS, then please get an administrator with OTRS access to update the image information to confirm this. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)

The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:07, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Molfetta Cathedral.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Molfetta Cathedral.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 (talk) 07:04, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 15 June 2009

Book review :Review of Cyberchiefs: Autonomy and Authority in Online Tribes
News and notes: License update, Google Translate, GLAM conference, Paid editing
Wikipedia in the news: In the Google News, London Review of Books, and more
WikiProject report: WikiProject Chemistry
Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 11:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 22 June 2009

Special report:Study of vandalism survival times
News and notes: Wikizine, video editing, milestones
Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia impacts town's reputation, assorted blogging
Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:25, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 29 June 2009

News and notes: Jackson's death, new data center, more
Wikipedia in the news: Google News Support, Wired editor plagiarizes Wikipedia, Rohde's kidnapping, Michael Jackson
Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 01:32, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Italian communes COAs on Commons

Hi, I'm Rar from Ukrainian wiki. I made stubs of all communes of Italy (using bot, example: uk:Чиримідо). Few days ago I started to move COAs with GNU-license from enwiki to Commons, but there is a problem with permission information (Commons:User talk:Rar#File Tagging File:AnguillaraSabazia-Stemma.gif). Could you help me with this problem? I found your talk page User talk:Attilios/Licenses. Is it enough to provide link to this page? I'm not good with licenses, so I will appreciate any help or explanations. Thank you! --Rar (talk) 09:51, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009

News and notes: Commons grant, license change, new chapters, usability and more
Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia and kidnapping, new comedy series
WikiProject report: WikiProject Food and Drink
Features and admins: Approved this week
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:13, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Query over licence

At Commons:File:Gallese-Stemma.gif there is comment that the files uploaded (and been transferred from WP to Commons) may not be {{GFDL}} and may only be fair use. Your addressing this issue would be useful. Thx. -- billinghurst (talk) 12:52, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Vinadio-Stemma.png

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Vinadio-Stemma.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 17:29, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassessment of Caravaggio

I have conducted a GA Sweeps reassessment of this article and found a large number of concerns which can be see ay Talk:Caravaggio/GA1. The article has been de-listed, but can be brought back to WP:GAN when these have been addressed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:21, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit of San Pietro in Montorio, Irish Princes' Tombs

I would like to know the reason for your edit of the page at http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/San_Pietro_in_Montorio. I would also point out that your edit is grammatically incorrect.

Elsidders (talk) 16:36, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)

The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:20, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion

Please see Wikipedia:Non-free_content_review#Category:Wikipedia_files_with_the_same_name_on_Wikimedia_Commons. You will need to submit a ticket to WP:OTRS to prevent them from being deleted. MBisanz ^talk 03:12, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Look, please stop uploading these images. There are serious issues with them (no OTRS ticket, and the question of whether they belong to that website anyway) and, unless you explain the situation at the discussion above, they're just going to get deleted. J Milburn (talk) 22:22, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, for a start, what makes you sure they belong to that website? Surely they would belong to the respective towns/regions? J Milburn (talk) 18:24, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't attack other users

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at WP:AIV. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. You may also want to read Wikipedia:Do not insult the vandals. Thanks - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 09:24, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maske: Thaery

I prefer shorter section titles, but WP:NOVSTY seems to recommend "Characters in [novel title]". Clarityfiend (talk) 16:59, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Elio Germano

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Elio Germano. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:13, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pin maps

Hi. Just remember that you can get the mountain to appear on a map of Italy like Monte Altissimo. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 11:40, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome job on Chiaravalle Abbey BTW. Are you still speaking to me? We used to talk a while back. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 11:48, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chiaravalle

Hi Attilio! I removed the image pictured right because I think it is one of the most incompetent photographs I have ever seen in the encyclopaedia. That sort of panoramic distortion is perfectly acceptable as long as you keep the tripod head level—see numerous shots of the Italian lakes, e.g. in the Lago di Como article. But tilt the camera and you are nearly always in deep, hot water.

You can leave it in if you want, but I do think that its sheer ugliness undermines the good work you did on the article. Cheers, Ian Spackman (talk) 20:37, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Failing a reponse I assume you don’t care. So I have removed the abortion of an image! Ian Spackman (talk) 19:38, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Syria

I am sorry to hear that it didn't go right! I will look at your articles. Amandajm (talk) 06:44, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Medeival battles

Hi! I have a challenge. Can you transwiki the articles from here? Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 15:26, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HI. Mostly the ones that ar emissing, I believe we have most of them alreayd in English. FIrst of all would be Battle of Cascina, we have an article on the painting but no real detail about the battle! Ciao! Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 15:58, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fortified house

Please use the "move" tag instead of cut and page when you want to rename a page. (You made it appear as if you had written the entire article that is now at Fortified houses in Ireland). I have fixed the page histories so the authors should now be correctly attributed, but next time, please don't cause extra work for us poor admins :) Happy editing, Kusma (talk) 11:23, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apostolic Palace

Why was the popular culture deleted from Apostolic Palace? Just because it is in a game does not render it "childish". Per WP:IPC, even a child's movie if referenced properly can be included. If you are going to reply here, please place a {{talkback}} template on my talk page. Warrior4321 Contact Me 16:05, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 27 July 2009

From the editor: Welcome to the build-your-own edition of the Signpost
Board elections: Board of Trustees elections draw 18 candidates for 3 seats
Wiki-Conference: Wikimedians and others gather for Wiki-Conference New York
Wikipedia Academy: Volunteers lead Wikipedia Academy at National Institutes of Health
News and notes: Things that happened in the Wikimedia world
Wikipedia in the news: Assorted news coverage of Wikipedia
Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
WikiProject report: WikiProject Oregon
Features and admins: Approved this week
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 07:39, 28 July 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject TRANSWIKI/Italian

Finally a project dedicated to listing missing articles in Italian and translating. I would be very grateful if you could join this project as a lot of the work you do anyway is precisely this! Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 14:14, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 3 August 2009

News and notes: WMF elections, strategy wiki, museum partnerships, and much more
Wikipedia in the news: Dispute over Rorschach test images, and more
Features and admins: Approved this week
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:21, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Licenses subpage

Hi. Due to this discussion it would be good if you could modify your "license" subpage to indicate that the www.araldicacivica.it permission is a Fair Use permission and not a GFDL permission. Thanks Lokal _Profil 18:43, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note also that the other permissions might be of similar nature. /Lokal _Profil 18:44, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Gaeta stemma.gif

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gaeta stemma.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

This is basically them same as the previous post. it's just so that these images get retagged and not uploaded to Commons (and then deleted). I'we added a score of other images to the same request. /Lokal _Profil 19:12, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)

The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:48, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 10 August 2009

Special story: Tropenmuseum to host partnered exhibit with Wikimedia community
News and notes: Tech news, strategic planning, BLP task force, and more
Wikipedia in the news: Shrinking community, GLAM-Wiki, and more
Features and admins: Approved this week
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:39, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of World domination

The article World domination has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is strictly original research. No evidence is given that any of the real historical information is related to the topic of "world domination." No references are given for fictional "world domination", or that it has even been discussed in secondary sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Steve Dufour (talk) 02:07, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Battisti

Thanks! However weren't all mine edits, the capitals letters were added by an other user. I reverted your last edit because the cause of Battisti death are unclear and the hospital didn't officially told the cause, so I think we shouldn't add that category. About the audio samples, they are in fair use so we have to use it in the article until someone will write albums articles, although you're right saying that they are too many and they make the article unreadable. Ciao, --Una giornata uggiosa '94 (talk) 17:35, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK (sì, sono italiano, il fatto è proprio questo e spero di non fare troppi errori ;-) ) --Una giornata uggiosa '94 (talk) 20:11, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing my typos. I'm not an expert about Guccini, De Gregori, Vecchioni and others italians musicians, but if I have time I can write short articles like the ones I'm writing for Battisti. --Una giornata uggiosa '94 (talk) 19:10, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 17 August 2009

From the editor: Where should the Signpost go from here?
Radio review: Review of Bigipedia radio series
News and notes: Three million articles, Chen, Walsh and Klein win board election, and more
Wikipedia in the news: Reports of Wikipedia's imminent death greatly exaggerated, and more
Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 01:09, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost: 24 August 2009

News and notes: $500,000 grant, Wikimania, Wikipedia Loves Art winners
Wikipedia in the news: Health care coverage, 3 million articles, inkblots, and more
Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
Features and admins: Approved this week
Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:00, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WP:PROGROCK

I'd like to invite you to join the newly-formed Progressive Rock music WikiProject. There are a lot of progressive rock-related articles on Wikipedia that could use a ~~little~~lot of attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help us get this project off the ground and a few progressive rock music pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks!

I noticed that you were the original creator of Template:User Progressive rock, and thought you might be interested in joining! Let me know. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 07:37, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bracciano

Care to explain? Mallerd (talk) 21:50, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is anything relevant? The Inglorious Bastards, not Inglorious Bastard. It is an Italian film. Mallerd (talk) 12:11, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Avigliano (PZ)

I didn't, I redirected to Avigliano (PZ)! The article about the comune was completely empty. As the article was about a small frazione within it seemd best to redirect into the main comune article and save space. Besides which I'm sure there was a consensus a while back to try to focus on expanding comune articles and not starting articles seperately on friazione until it had developed. At a later date when the ,ain comune article develops it can be split into its own article then... Himalayan 17:12, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this was fully translated then there would be a needed for seperate articles! Himalayan 17:15, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rimozione immagini in pagina Catania

Ciao, mi spieghi su che base l'immagine di Giovanni Verga e quella di Vincenzo Bellini non servono nella pagina della cultura di Catania? Il mio non è assolutamente un flame, ma rimuoverle così improvvisamente e con una motivazione soggettiva mi sembra un attimino inopportuno... potevi proporlo in area discussione prima... Drunkpiper (talk) 21:11, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Images in mug

Forgive my strong language yesterday (just woke up, in a wrong time :-). I shall revert your good-faith image placement edit in mug, but let me first explain why. Image placement is an art which I'm still mastering. The most frequent mistake I see is editors forget about different screen resolution. Some operators are screen-scalable, some (specifying px size) are not. I myself test my edits on 1024x768 and 1280x1024, IE and Firefox, which I believe are the most popular settings, but some users still complain they see garbage on their PCs after my edits. Specifics in mug are: (i) You tried to equalize image size, but made it different in left and right columns. As a result, some mugs are disproportionately large on 1024x768, not to mention low res which is still used. On the other hand, Figs. 2-4 pack well into history on 1024x768, but cut through the next section on 1280x1024. (ii) Shaving mug should stay in its section. (iii) Mug tree has text over it on 1024x768 and ugly cuts though the section on 1280x1024. I accept there are too many images in the body of that article, but they are all functional. "My" operator {{clear}} is a universal approach to fix those ugly cuts through sections, on any settings and resolution. Having blank space is much less of a problem than mixed up image and text - as the main contributor I do hope to add text to fill the gaps there.

Just to illustrate my point, let us look at some page, e.g. your user page, as you suggested.

On my both resolutions, I see your nice veteran badge completely covered up by the TOC text. Maybe __NOTOC__ is an option, followed by some image placement tweak?
"Articles I created or brought to a decent status" has a fixed width and thus takes small part of your user pagewidth. I would use, e.g., 100% instead of 450px. An alternative is {{collapse}} template (but I admit that might be ugly there).
Your barnstars have variable width, which again can be tweaked by adding, e.g., "width: 90%" into the "style".

Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 23:49, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PS Just a note that mere editing your talk page of 243 kb is time consuming on some slow PCs. Usual practice is to archive long talks.