User talk:AtomsRavelAz

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marcelo Claure

@AtomsRavelAz: Your additions, don't constitute BLP. This article is a BLP, not a company. And it seems to be full press-releases, to a certain extent. scope_creep^Talk 17:55, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep: in your opinion, does the entirety of the edit not constitute BPL?. If so, why do you believe it is not BPL?. I just want to know your full arguments before I write anything regarding this. Thanks, AtomsRavelAz talk 18:17, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It decent for all that. It just needs slimmed somewhat. Excessive details about company growth is considered promotional and of little use for the reason. Your controversies section can go in but you will need to make an edit request which is the normal way that coi editors, edit articles. It looks ok, but an editor in good standing needs to look at it and see if it is ok. The rest is well written but there is too much company information, particularly when some of them have their own articles. scope_creep^Talk 18:24, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks a lot for your guidance and help, I'll get to it. AtomsRavelAz talk 18:28, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Great work! Marti Siurana (talk) 19:28, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COI and paid editing

AtomsRavelAz, greetings. Thank you for your message at the WP:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. Please read WP:COI, and disclose your paid editing here in this section, or feel free to start another one. Please stop editing any articles or topics for which you are being paid or have a conflict of interest, until your disclosure notice is placed. To help avoid problems in the future, when you start editing them again, please use template {{connected contributor (paid)}} on the Talk pages of articles concerned. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 19:30, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mathglot: I apologize, I'm confused, I already disclosed my paid editing on my user page. I thought that was enough since Wikipedia:CONFLICT states that "There are three venues to do this" and not that all three venues are mandatory. Could you please clarify?. Thanks, AtomsRavelAz talk 19:37, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, I apologize; I should've looked there first, instead of coming directly to your Talk page. That looks fine, you're good. Just keep in mind the template for Talk pages when you edit articles. All is well, happy editing! Mathglot (talk) 19:40, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

International Trade Council moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, International Trade Council, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MarioGom (talk) 19:29, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MarioGom: Hey, thanks for the heads-up. Before making any changes to the now-draft, I'd like to know from your point of view what exactly is it lacking?, why should it not be an article?. I'd really appreciate if you could shed some light on that, because I believe that the article already has reliable, independent sources, but perhaps I'm mistaken. Thanks, AtomsRavelAz talk 19:36, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Trade Council (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Might be notable, but needs additional sources not related with or connected to the ITC; the Mission section for instance is solely based upon An ITC source. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 10:10, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:International Trade Council and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:International Trade Council, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 10:10, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AtomsRavelAz! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 10:10, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AtomsRavelAz, perhaps this search will help you:

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

At first glance, there's not a lot there, but keep digging. Good luck, Mathglot (talk) 10:51, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Trade Council (March 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:International Trade Council and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:International Trade Council, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 02:46, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:International Trade Council

Hello, AtomsRavelAz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:International Trade Council, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:International Trade Council

Hello, AtomsRavelAz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "International Trade Council".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]