User talk:Asyulus
|
|
Hello! Asyulus,
you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!
|
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Asyulus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome!
Comments for List of largest known stars
[edit]Hi, I saw your edits in the comments of stars in the list of largest known stars. You don't need to add the constellation in the comments since it was very obvious. One knows that UY Scuti is in Scutum simply because it has the constellation's genitive. Plus, do not tell a particular star in a particular rank.. Again, we must note that their sizes are not yet well determined. KY Cygni may be equal to VY Canis Majoris but the latter one has a ± 120 solar radii figure. Also, it is not very wise to say UY Scuti is the largest known star simply because it has a ± 192 solar radii figure. That's why I've put in the article it was the "largest known star at most likelihood" since it is still very unusual.
I will revert your comments. Please post to my talk if you have any questions. Thank you! SkyFlubbler (talk) 13:48, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Very suspicious Largest lists
[edit]I can see you create astronomy lists about the "largests". That is good, but they are not very accurate.
I don't boast myself as a more expert astronomy major, but your lists have exeedingly wrong info. Like the largest galaxies. You said IC 1101 is the largest at 5.6 Mly while the fact the "true" largest is a supergiant BCG in the constellation Camelopardalis at 15 Mly. Another is the list of largest known nebulae. You said the Tarantula Nebula is the largest at 300 ly by the fact that the "true" largest is the LAB concentration in the constellation Aquarius at 200 million ly.
But anyway, those topics are amazing. But next time use your sandbox and inform it to any expert astronomers at the Wikiproject. You can also consult me if you want. Thank you. If you are willing we can be pals for the project.
I will consent your lists to the Wikiproject astronomy. SkyFlubbler (talk) 12:26, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Your lists
[edit]
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
-- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 06:10, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
{{Unreferenced}} tag on List of largest known nebulae
[edit]
An editor has tagged List of largest known nebulae, an article which you have created or worked on, as {{Unreferenced}}. Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia, but when adding content (particularly for facts and figures), please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing, especially when adding information about living persons that is even remotely contentious. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
-- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 07:54, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Brothers in Arms 3 Early Game play screenshot.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:05, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
December 2014
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in United States, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Chamith (talk) 03:53, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to List of largest known stars, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Please only use actual values cited in references given. "Averaging" between different citations simply introduces noise into the Wiki. Please read WP:SYNTH which talks about what you are trying to do - specifically "Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources." Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 05:19, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
request
[edit]please stay away from the list of largest stars article. thanks Tetra quark (talk) 17:36, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- That's an inappropriate demand, verging on WP:OWN. Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 20:39, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Let me restate it: I know you are just trying to help the Wikiproject:Astronomical objects, but your recent edits in the past few months is not considered to be constructive. Your edits at the List of largest known stars do not appear to follow our guidelines. As far as you are concerned, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Encyclopedias are messengers, and not creators, of information. You are arguing VV Cephei A is 1,475, although if you read the refs, you will never see that number. Please report what the references say. You cannot put 1,500 when one ref says 1,000 and the other says 2,000. That would cause misconception. As far as you know, Wikipedia is a very powerful medium of information. Other people will quote 1,500, and the scientists of two references would be confused.
Let's face it, there's no unique star in the universe in size terms. Don't put unusual numbers in the list, that is a big mistake.
Oh, by the way, as far as you know, the List of largest known galaxies which you've created is on the verge of deletion. You created an article without peer review. If you look at my List of most massive black holes, that is a very clear list, product of seven months of blood, sweat, brain and tears. I hope you understand that.
In the meantime, when you'll create or edit, please ask us first. We can help. SkyFlubbler (talk with me :-D) 09:04, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- Ok Asyulus
Orphaned non-free image File:Hobbit, Battle of Five Armies US poster.jpeg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Hobbit, Battle of Five Armies US poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:29, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
File:IC 1101, telescope image.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IC 1101, telescope image.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Alex (Ashill | talk | contribs) 18:11, 8 May 2015 (UTC) —Alex (Ashill | talk | contribs) 18:11, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:IC 1101, telescope image.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:IC 1101, telescope image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Huntster (t @ c) 11:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Marvel Contest of champions official banner logo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Marvel Contest of champions official banner logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:NBA 2K15 Xbox One Cover.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:NBA 2K15 Xbox One Cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 03:21, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:CocoMartin2017Official.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:CocoMartin2017Official.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:32, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Coco Martin wearing leather jacket for a photoshoot.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Coco Martin wearing leather jacket for a photoshoot.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 13:55, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Ang Panday 2017 Logo.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Ang Panday 2017 Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Asyulus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Jack Em Popoy: The Puliscredibles
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Jack Em Popoy: The Puliscredibles, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Shirt58 (talk) 09:57, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Asyulus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Asyulus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Marvel Contest of champions official banner logo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Marvel Contest of champions official banner logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Marvel Contest of champions official banner logo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Marvel Contest of champions official banner logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:25, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Dungeon Hunter 5 for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dungeon Hunter 5, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dungeon Hunter 5 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Dragon Mania Legends for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dragon Mania Legends, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragon Mania Legends until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
The article List of largest nebulae has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Proposing deletion of this page, for many reasons: The nebulae listed here are particularly too common, with astonishingly large ones at the top and a sudden fall in sizes with few in between. It is too incomplete and a lot of nebulae (particularly the ones deep in the Milky Way and other galaxies) are not included, to the point that this has become inaccurate. It suffers the same problems as the previous List of largest galaxies - sources are simply too few in order to make a worthy list.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SkyFlubbler (talk) 12:03, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of List of largest nebulae for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of largest nebulae until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.