User talk:AstralM0nké

Concern regarding Draft:Maya Kucherskaya (writer)

Hello, AstralM0nké. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maya Kucherskaya (writer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:13, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Maya Kucherskaya (writer)

Hello, AstralM0nké. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Maya Kucherskaya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:48, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maya Kucherskaya (writer) (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources required for biographical information like birthdate, etc. Also, she could not have won the Booker Prize (which is what "Booker Award" currently links to) in 2007 - she's Russian.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maya Kucherskaya (writer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 07:35, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AstralM0nké! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! asilvering (talk) 07:35, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Maya Kucherskaya has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Maya Kucherskaya. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 08:52, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Maya Kucherskaya has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Maya Kucherskaya. Thanks! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 13:41, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maya Kucherskaya has been accepted

Maya Kucherskaya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spinster300 (talk) 17:14, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Soviet School of Translation moved to draftspace

I have moved your page Soviet School of Translation to draftspace to main space for a few reasons. First, it has insufficient citations to reliable sources. Only one reference is cited currently. Second, the phrase "The USSR made great contributions to the study and practice of translation," does not reflect a neutral point of view and should be reworded. Third, per your own admission, it is a skeleton of an article. It should not be moved back to mainspace until it is more filled out. I suggest submitting it through the Articles for Creation process rather than moving it yourself. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:07, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for moving it! AstralM0nké (talk) 23:49, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seventy-Stanzas-on-Emptiness (May 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Herald was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seventy-Stanzas-on-Emptiness and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:40, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Not the reviewer) Out of three sources cited, one of them is the subject itself. That doesn't help show that the topic meets criteria for a standalone article ("notability"). The sources also need to have more than just a passing mention of the concept.

The unorthodox method is to not create a new article at all and instead add the information (and sources) to an existing article on a related topic, such as Nagarjuna#Works. If you want, you can create a redirect from Seventy-Stanzas-on-Emptiness to its mention in the existing article and tag the redirect with {{R with possibilities}}. (Of course, leaving it alone as a redlink also works.)

Then, if the topic gains more coverage later on, it can eventually be split or spun-off into its own article. Until then, information already has somewhere in the encyclopedia proper to go (opposed to a draft or user sandbox).

Again, just my opinion; another Wikipedia editor may have a differing view. Thanks for reading, and good luck. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 13:23, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Soviet School of Translation

Hello, AstralM0nké. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Soviet School of Translation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Seventy-Stanzas-on-Emptiness

Hello, AstralM0nké. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seventy-Stanzas-on-Emptiness, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]