User talk:Ashwin Kumar A P

Daya Krishna

Hi. The entire unreferenced text was

Daya Krishna is a leading Indian philosopher who is a professor at Rajasthan University. He has tried to build bridges between traditional and Western philosophers. He is associated with Project of History of Indian Science, Philosophy and Culture.

The deleted article did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that he meets the notability guidelines for academics.

If you feel that you can address the notability issue and provide good third-party references, make sure that you

write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. As an example, leading in the deleted text is an opinion unsupported by fact.
write in your own words. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Let me know if you have any questions, Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:32, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Daya Krishna was accepted

Daya Krishna, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SAMI ^talk 12:34, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Project page

Hi. Please don't put your project page in article space. I've moved it to your user space until you decide what to do with it. Deb (talk) 11:03, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Thank you. Ashwin Kumar A P (talk) 11:12, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please announce yourselves properly at Wikipedia:School and university projects#Current projects and provide a link to the project page.

Added a section on this project here: Wikipedia:School and university projects#Current projects. And provided a link to the details in that page.

Sad

Too many student projects are supervised by people who know nothing about Wikipedia. You at least do have a contributions history so I am saddened to see you let students get away with basic blunders like <h1> and boldened section headings or hopelessly unencyclopedic style. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:44, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies about the writing standards. For most users, this is their first attempt at writing wiki articles. Therefore they have been advised not to publish or submit their articles for review unless it has been approved by their course instructors. We are reviewing the sandboxes of student users. First, we intend to create an exhaustive list of the links for articles, classified by quality. Later, we intend to review those articles which are among the better ones. Given the scale of the task, we expect to complete this in about a month from now. Ashwin Kumar A P (talk) 11:37, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Wildlife Endocrinology

Hello, Ashwin Kumar A P. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Wildlife Endocrinology, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 11:10, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wildlife Endocrinology

Hello, Ashwin Kumar A P. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wildlife Endocrinology".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:41, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]