User talk:Ashimneupaney

This is Ashimneupaney's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:NLT has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:NLT. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:34, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert, I drafted the article as 'NLT' instead of 'Nepal Live Today' by mistake. Can the article just be named 'Nepal Live Today'? Also, I am making some minor changes in the article, and adding sources and citations for the same. Thank you Ashimneupaney (talk) 08:38, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert, why am I not getting any replies or comments on my article? Thank you Ashimneupaney (talk) 18:34, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I have removed all the unnecessary information from the article. Can you please review it again? Thank you. Ashimneupaney (talk) 16:04, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nepal Live Today (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nepal Live Today and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nepal Live Today, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 15:39, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ashimneupaney! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fade258 (talk) 15:39, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fade, I just received your reply. May I know where do I need to make the changes or add more references in the article? Thank you Ashimneupaney (talk) 07:56, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for late reply. If you have reliable sources, independent and primary sources then you are free to add between any sorts of information which you added. Fade258 (talk) 07:16, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I have added a few independent sources in the article. Is there anything I need to improve in the article? Ashimneupaney (talk) 14:56, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I have updated the article, and removed all the unnecessary information. Can you please review it. Thank you Ashimneupaney (talk) 16:25, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nepal Live Today (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read this before submitting again. Thanks!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nepal Live Today and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nepal Live Today, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 07:13, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SwasthyaKhabar Magazine

Hello Ashimneupaney,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SwasthyaKhabar Magazine for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:16, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello Ashimneupaney. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to SwasthyaKhabar Magazine, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ashimneupaney. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ashimneupaney|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Owlf 📪 08:37, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by ACME for their contributions to Wikipedia.

Ashimneupaney (talk) 18:37, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nepal Live Today has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nepal Live Today. Thanks! Owlf 📪 08:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nepal Live Today

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nepal Live Today requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Owlf 📪 09:02, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nepal Live Today (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Owlf was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nepal Live Today and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nepal Live Today, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Owlf 📪 10:42, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nepal Live Today (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nepal Live Today and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nepal Live Today, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Ashimneupaney. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ARose Wolf 19:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Okay, step back and take some deep breaths. I know this process can be frustrating but it's that way to keep non-notable subjects out of the encyclopedia. Being as you have a COI you need to declare that on your user page, user talk page or the article talk page. There is a template to follow that will add this to your user page. What you will do is add this template {{UserboxCOI|Draft:Nepal Live Today}} to your user page. That declares you have a COI. Next you will need to review the WP:NMEDIA guidelines for what is considered notable and make sure the draft meets those requirements. Remove anything that might be considered puffery or non-neutral. Once you have declared and have removed anything non-neutral from that article you should read over the article and see if it sounds like something you would see in a PR publication or online company profile. Being an employee of the subject, Wikipedia is not concerned what Nepal Live Today says about itself but what other reliable sources say about the subject media organization. If you determine that you can not provide enough significant coverage in reliable independent sources from that of the subject then I would agree that the draft probably needs to be deleted. You can request a speedy deletion at that time. Try everything else first though. Give it a chance. You've been bold this far. --ARose Wolf 19:32, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did the "COI" part again. let's see what happens, and I will let you know. Thank you for helping Ashimneupaney (talk) 19:42, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, you added that to the article but that template belongs on your user page, not the article itself. Click on the "User page" tab at the top of this talk page page. Currently it is red. You will add the template in the box and publish the changes. --ARose Wolf 19:54, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. 331dot (talk) 20:19, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ashimneupaney (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi there, I think I have been blocked as I have two accounts. This one and the old one. I created this account as I forgot the password of the first one. I didn't know having two accounts would lead to account block. As I have been constantly editing the article for its betterment, I have no hidden interest for the same. And the another reason behind me creating a new account is that I found the process really difficult in the first place. I only got used to with wikipedia content creation after using it for some time. I don't know if you will find my justification valid, but this is why I created this account. thank you Ashimneupaney (talk) 07:18, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your original account was blocked indefinitely, so you should not have created a new account. The block is on you as a person, not just on the account. PhilKnight (talk) 07:53, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ashimneupaney (talk) 07:18, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nepal Live Today (May 23)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:33, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ashimneupaney (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just tried to publish my article. No way I was trying to violate the guidelines of wikipedia. IN an attempt to publish my article I created two accounts. Ashimneupaney (talk) 13:16, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yes, that is indeed why this account was blocked. Yamla (talk) 14:27, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ashimneupaney (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okay, so Wikipedia doesn't even accept valid reasons? If I was just trying to violate the guidelines willingly, why would I give clarifications again and again? I am already clearly mentioning that I just tried to submit my article, and didn't know I was violating the guidelines willingly. I hope you get my point.

Decline reason:

You already have an unblock request open at your original account, Nepallivetoday. There's no reason to open one here, too. 17:34, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We know why you were blocked; you need to do more than tell us why, you need to tell us what you will do differently. 331dot (talk) 15:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Nepallivetoday per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nepallivetoday. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 09:39, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nepal Live Today

Hello, Ashimneupaney. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nepal Live Today, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:19, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nepal Live Today

Hello, Ashimneupaney. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nepal Live Today".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:30, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]