User talk:Samkeyta

December 2018

Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jamling Tenzing Norgay, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 04:14, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Jamling Tenzing Norgay, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "publish changes" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 04:14, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Samiran Nundy, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 04:16, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your recent edit to St. Paul's School, Darjeeling appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you.

Hello. Your recent edit to St. Paul's School, Darjeeling appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 18:09, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Mahesh Jethmalani, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 18:09, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Karun Krishna Majumdar, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 18:09, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About your recent edits

Please don't add wikipedia.org links to the text of articles. That is not how to add links. Please review the basics on Wikipedia formatting before adding or changing anything else. This is a good place to start. Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 18:09, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hi. Rather than adding "footnotes", use the ref and /ref tags to add a citation. You're breaking the text flow with your current style of citation. --regentspark (comment) 17:21, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the citation shoul support the fact that the person attended the school. If the person is blue linked (i.e., an article on the individual exists), the linked page should have cited support that the person attended St. Paul's. If it is redlinked, in addition to the citation supporting school attendance, there should be some indication of notability in that (or a second) citation. I notice you've been warned about citations before so please be careful going forward. Best wishes. --regentspark (comment) 17:25, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you... m learning since I am affiliated to St. Paul’s school as a alumni officer Arnold mukhia (talk) 17:30, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello. Your recent edits to St. Paul's School, Darjeeling appear to be adding names of people to a list that should include only notable entries. I have sought to verify the entries, but 6 of the first 10 that I checked fail verification. In those instances, your provided source doesn't mention St. Paul's at all. Additionally, your references need to be cited from a reliable source. In general, a person added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create articles for these people, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. (Either write the articles first or provide a reliable source for verifiability per WP:SOURCELIST and to demonstrate that the person meets the Wikipedia notability requirements per WP:LISTPEOPLE.) —Scottyoak2 (talk) 02:49, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, will you please stop with the footnote stuff, it is getting annoying. And please respond here so that we know you're reading all these messages otherwise you will be blocked merely to get your attention. --regentspark (comment) 13:49, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at St. Paul's School, Darjeeling. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Scottyoak2 (talk) 16:10, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bishonen: Could you do something that will get this editor's attention? --regentspark (comment) 16:19, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 16:21, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regentspark, it's probably dinner time in Bish's time zone. I blocked the editor temporarily for disruptive editing. I trust you and your colleagues can go through and clean up that list, removing unverified stuff, and pruning horribly promotional language--someone was a stalward in telecom? Drmies (talk) 16:22, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Drmies. Much appreciated!--regentspark (comment) 16:25, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am directly involved in St Paul’s School Darjeeling alumni matters... I added the names Arnold mukhia (talk) 16:27, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That you are is not a surprise to anyone here: your edits show all the hallmarks of COI editing--see the notification below, and its associated links. If you have a COI, you need to declare that, lest you be blocked from editing the article altogether. But most of all, you need to respond to concerns uttered by other editors--your talk page is full of concerns, yet the first time you respond is after you got blocked. Drmies (talk) 16:51, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I did not know about this talk platform. Was only concentrating to include notable Alumni. Next time I will keep in mind. Arnold mukhia (talk) 18:13, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am the only person who will edit this article... having a problem to improve it. Arnold mukhia (talk) 18:16, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Arnold mukhia. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page St. Paul's School, Darjeeling, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:52, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I work in this institution so how can there be conflict of interested... I improved a lot but my hard work went in vain. Arnold mukhia (talk) 17:07, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your work is still available in the page history. I started a discussion on the talk page at Talk:St. Paul's School, Darjeeling#Notable alumni including links to find your additions. You can propose names to be added to the article there to be considered by other editors. For other changes your should start new sections using the link at the top of the page and adding {{request edit}} template. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 02:15, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you can I edit now with citations...is LinkedIn Arnold mukhia (talk) 04:23, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is Linkendln source of ciatation Arnold mukhia (talk) 04:24, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LINKEDIN and WP:Twitter-EL can be used, but please try to find better sources if you can. These are both WP:PRIMARY sources that are WP:SELFPUBLISH. WP:BLPSELFPUB says they can be used but give a checklist of things to consider before using them. But these sources can only be used to establish that the person went to St. Pauls. If they do not have a Wikipedia article, you will need another source to establish notability. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 05:59, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello can you help to create a new heading Gallery Arnold mukhia (talk) 08:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:GALLERY galleries are discouraged.Richard-of-Earth (talk) 01:35, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alumni addition

Can I edit the alumni page Arnold mukhia (talk) 04:55, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Arnold mukhia, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Arnold mukhia, good luck, and have fun. regentspark (comment) 14:03, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've "welcomed" you to wikipedia (a bit on the late side). It seems to me that you don't understand how Wikipedia works and I strongly suggest you take some time to explore the links in the welcome message. Otherwise, you're going to get into trouble. --regentspark (comment) 14:04, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of boarding schools in India‎, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:09, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok ... the school I removed are not boarding school but day boarding schools Arnold mukhia (talk) 14:14, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

St Joseph School clears mentions in Wikipedia as day and boarding school... there is a difference between boarding and day boarding... hence it should be listed ... Arnold mukhia (talk) 14:22, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Arnold mukhia (talk) 14:22, 8 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Likewise St Augustine School and Goethals Arnold mukhia (talk) 14:23, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are school in India where it is catogoried as boarding, day boarding and day school... this page contridicts it’s mean Arnold mukhia (talk) 14:26, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Samkeyta, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to St. Paul's School, Darjeeling have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. I also removed it because it sounded a bit promo. I have a storng feeling you have a COI, seeing your other messages. Please don't edit St. Paul's School, Darjeeling for the time being. Thank you. Signed,The4lines |||| ^{(You Asked?) (What I have Done.)} 03:33, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello. Your recent edit to St. Paul's School, Darjeeling appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. You provided several references but they do not satisfy Wikipedia notability criteria. Gab4gab (talk) 13:35, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IAS office and chief secretary and captain of a state in cricket team is very notable. He was a figure In Odisha administration. Kindly reinstate it Samkeyta (talk) 12:23, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your claims of notability are not convincing. You seem to be expressing your personal view of notability rather than the Wikipedia consensus view of the term. If you are confident he is notable then write a stub biography for him before restoring his name to the list. It takes little time to create a stub article. Perhaps you are concerned that his article would not survive at Articles for Deletion. Your pattern of adding red-link names to the list and repeatedly restoring them when other editors object is not helpful. Gab4gab (talk) 13:40, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think this editor can create articles since the mobile app is being used for all his edits. Also, I do not think the difficulty is this editor is being nonobjective. The problem is he is going by how other schools are represented on Wikipedia. The Lawrence School, Sanawar#Notable alumni looks to be the worse, but List of Martinians has some too. List of The Doon School alumni has them as well, but they simply do not link the names so you do not see the redlinks. We know WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS does not justify an addition, but try to understand this editor's viewpoint. Also, I do not know which specific entry he is referring to, but see WP:NCRICKET to see if this fellow deserves an article. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 15:52, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't thought of editors unable to create articles - makes adding new names to the alumni list who don't yet have articles an awkward choice of tasks. Based on my understanding of cricket notability I've created a stub for Lalat Indu Parija. Gab4gab (talk) 16:39, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Samkeyta (talk) 05:54, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, St. Paul's School, Darjeeling, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 01:41, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in St. Paul's School, Darjeeling, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 01:41, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! But I fail to understand how additions of building and structures need citations. Samkeyta (talk) 02:24, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to the article included claims such as directors' names and when they served, when buildings were constructed or removed, who the buildings were named after, the origin of building materials, enrollment numbers, the motto and emblem details... in short, it's a long history of the school, with zero references given. This is not acceptable - you need to show some sort of proof that these things happened.

The equally problematic issue is that your contribution was full of errors such as random capital letters, which would take other editors a long time to fix. Your additions need to conform to the Manual of Style as much as you are able, or you're putting an unfair burden on to other editors.

It you cannot provide references and correct text, keep in mind that you can always post a request on the article's Talk page regarding any changes or additions you'd like to see made. Jessicapierce (talk) 03:34, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sanjay Ray Chaudhuri for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sanjay Ray Chaudhuri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjay Ray Chaudhuri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 14:15, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep:- He is an important personality who changed the Television Industry in India. I had added various citations. If he and his partner( who is in Wikipedia) changed the media industry in India. Sanjay is notable entrepreneur in India. Historically he was responsible for introducing a change in media industry Samkeyta (talk) 04:00, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop The Disruption

Do not edit on already closed AFD’s. I wouldn’t warn you again. Celestina007 (talk) 02:56, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Samkeyta (talk) 17:44, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sanjay Ray Chaudhuri ( Ray C)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sanjay Ray Chaudhuri ( Ray C) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjay Ray Chaudhuri. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 14:57, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is the verdict?

Samkeyta (talk) 05:25, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sanjay Ray Chaudhuri (Ray C)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sanjay Ray Chaudhuri (Ray C) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjay Ray Chaudhuri. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ... discospinster _talk 17:48, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

TomStar81 (Talk) 11:24, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samkeyta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I many not a best editor. I have being learning and trying my best to improve as a responsible editor. I humbly request to unblock me so I can learn from mistakes.Samkeyta (talk) 09:08, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have been blocked for being WP:NOTHERE and using multiple accounts, but you do not address this. 331dot (talk) 09:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

The person has blocked without adequate reason permanently how do I unblock Samkeyta (talk) 02:59, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks and follow the instructions (under WP:NICETRY).--RegentsPark (comment) 17:59, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Still blocked Samkeyta (talk) 18:04, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are indefinitely blocked and need to file an unblock appeal. Read the page I've linked above. --RegentsPark (comment) 20:25, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir please can you write an article on Sanjay Ray Chaudhuri...So I can learn from you as how to write an article correctly.Thank you sir! Samkeyta (talk) 10:51, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samkeyta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not know multiple accounts are not allowed. I would be obliged if other accounts are blocked forever. But please allow me to continue this account and be a responsible editor. Thank you sir Samkeyta (talk) 10:49, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You appear to be deliberately avoiding part of the reason you were blocked. As you refuse to address the reason for your block, there are no grounds to consider lifting that block. Yamla (talk) 12:05, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I myself not sure about being blocked... I recreated a deleted article and have a multiple account used my family. Was blocked. I want the accounts blocked if the same maybe and unblock my primary account. Samkeyta (talk) 12:28, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to be reconsidered. So I can edit. please block other accounts used from the IP but please unblock this account.

Samkeyta (talk) 12:30, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samkeyta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Since I have multiple accounts used by my phone I was blocked. I request to unblock others accounts and unblock this account. My phone is used by other members in my family.. so the problem has raised. Samkeyta (talk) 12:34, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

"The other accounts associated with me are my family" is one of the most common excuses used for sockpuppetry. I'm afraid that if we can't verify that an account is you and you alone, we can't unblock you. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:55, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.