User talk:ArnieD11
May 2019[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Sinan Sakić, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:11, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
October 2019[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović. Favonian (talk) 17:44, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SpencerT•C 17:57, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
ArnieD11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand that what I did was not acceptable, but if I should be blocked then so should the user Tzowu as he has also continually made disruptive edits including his constant undoing and eventual changing of my prior contributions as well as Zeljko Bebek's wikipedia decription from Bosnian to Croatian. He was born in Bosnia therefore he is Bosnian. To claim that he is solely Croatian is a blatant lie and merely a bias on his end towards Croatia. I would have stopped with these edits had he stopped, but he was persistent therefore so was I.
Decline reason:
This request almost exclusively talks about the behavior of others; you weren't blocked for what others did, but for what you did. Your unblock request should only address what you did, as you can only control your own behavior. If others are behaving improperly, that does not justify your own inappropriate behavior. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:15, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I was in the middle of reviewing this unblock request. I agree with 331dot, this is totally unacceptable. If you want to have a chance of being unblocked, you'll want to read and thoroughly understand WP:GAB. The request you made above totally justifies leaving you blocked indefinitely. --Yamla (talk) 10:17, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
ArnieD11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Schmucks. All your response shows is just how out of touch you and your admins are with everything that happens on Wikipedia. Keep me blocked and keep promoting false information to be posted. This won't change anything --- believe me ;)
Decline reason:
Courtesy decline. The editor has indicated a desire to remain blocked ("keep me blocked"). Chetsford (talk) 08:33, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.