User talk:Arjunjmenon1

March 2014

Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Cassette Scandal because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 17:35, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Muhammad Ali Jinnah, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:49, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:NeilN. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:10, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please be civil, civility is one of the five pillars of Wikipedia. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 21:27, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't type in all capital letters; that is considered yelling and uncivil, as suggested above. 331dot (talk) 10:14, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Ganges. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you continue to use such terms as "white supremacists" you will probably find yourself blocked from editing. NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:23, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok .I didn't know Wikipedia does not allow new user registrations .

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:35, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at India. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:20, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at India. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. I have explained clearly on the talk page why the Indian national bird is the Indian peafowl. If you keep making repetitive unilateral edits, i.e. without gaining consensus on the talk page, you are looking to be blocked. Best regards, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 16:15, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ganges, you may be blocked from editing. Persistent and provocative unilateral edits which change an article's name whether in its title or in its text constitute vandalism. Be warned that the common courtesy granted to new editors can only last so long. Continuing to make these edits in the face of multiple warnings will result in a block. Best regards, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 23:07, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Cadbury Dairy Milk. Favonian (talk) 16:13, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arjunjmenon1: the edit you linked to at User talk:Favonian was made logged out. That is not good. Please make sure you are logged in. Also, you did not add any sources to support all those changes. May I suggest you not edit on your mobile device? The interface appears to be making it hard for you to add references, or is preventing you from previewing and seeing that you have damaged the article by leaving off a closing ref tag. Yngvadottir (talk) 18:24, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]