User talk:Arjayay/Archive 11
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | → | Archive 15 |
That was a sock, just not who you think it was. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iniced. Same thing with User:Dotheclearing. As far as I can tell, the only page Iniced and Fangusu have intersected on is Love Me, Love My Mouse. Of course, all that really matters is sockpuppets get blocked, but I thought you might be interested in knowing who the actual sockmaster in this case was. Sro23 (talk) 01:45, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
"Very mixed"
Hi Arjayay, firstly, I think you're strong editor, and it's nice to have you around. I don't think I pay enough compliments around here, so I want you to know that I think you're definitely a good egg. Moving on, re: this a quick note: I removed the critical response summaries from Prem Ratan Dhan Payo, because they're not adequately supported. Per MOS:FILM, we need to attribute a summary of critical response to reliable sources. It's not good for us to summarize critical response ourselves for a few reasons:
- If we summarize the reviews that are in the article, we run the risk of confirming someone else's selection bias. If a marketing team only added good reviews to the article, then we came by and said, "the film received mostly positive reviews", I'm sure you can understand how that would be a problem.
- If we try to pick the reviews ourselves, then summarize that selection, we might be confirming our own bias. If I hated the film and consciously/unconsciously picked negative reviews, I'd wind up concluding that the film received negative reviews. That's a problem too.
- Even if a good editor came by and picked a balanced selection of positive and negative reviews, we might come by and interpret that as mixed, when in fact the overall response might have been positive or negative.
Anyway, there was no attempt to attribute the summary to a reliable source. The only source I saw was this, which says nothing about critical reception.
I'll also note that "very mixed" is kinda meaningless. "Mixed" means that film received both positive and negative reviews, so what would "very mixed" mean? That it received LOTS of positive and negative reviews? It doesn't improve our understanding. Mixed is mixed. This is also why WikiProject Film dislikes the phrasing "mixed to positive" and "mixed to negative", because those terms are also meaningless. If mixed means "positive and negative", then "mixed to positive" means "positive and negative to positive". What? Anyway, I'm sure you can see my point, so I'll leave you alone. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:42, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Edit of Raiganj
Thanks for your help in wiki uploads. But I didn't copy the article regarding Tulaipanji Rice and the content is also different from the source and I addes citation too. Why my edit was reverted? Paulsubhojit (talk) 09:38, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
- Paulsubhojit Although you say you did not copy it, large sections of your addition were word for word the same as the article I referenced in the edit summary
In addition the article is about Raiganj, not Tulaipanji Rice. As you well know the rice has its own article, mentioning that Tulaipanji Rice is grown there may be acceptable, the reader can then look it up if they wish to, but repeating so much of that article looks like a WP:COATRACK addition.
Are you trying to promote Tulaipanji Rice? - Arjayay (talk) 09:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing out my flaws. I have re inserted those section by mentioning proper sources of information. Paulsubhojit (talk) 09:28, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Paulsubhojit - Not bad, but you cannot use Wikipedia as a reference, because it is not a reliable source. Please replace those uses of Wikipedia with a reliable, external, source. In addition, you are only using bare URLs (i.e. the web page address without any other details) Please see Help:Referencing for beginners for how it should be done - Arjayay (talk) 09:35, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Arjayay i have also removed the wiki reference and added some ref that supports my information. Thanks for your help Paulsubhojit (talk) 09:26, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Arjayay sorry for the templete removal. It was caused due to network problems. I have added couple of references to the page, please give it a look. Are those enough to remove the templete? Paulsubhojit (talk) 13:39, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Great job. Happy Holidays and a Prosperous 2017. Quis separabit? 05:48, 24 December 2016 (UTC) |
- Thanks Quis separabit? - I don't know what I did - but thanks all the same - Arjayay (talk) 10:09, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2017! |
Hello Arjayay, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2017. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Reweti Tuhorouta Kohere
Thank you for your words. In saying that... do not say I am an unreliable source of my own great grandfather. Just because I am not printed doesn't make me or my kin unreliable sources. But its not your fault that there is a flaw in the system. Smilerreborn (talk) 08:39, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Edit requests
Hi, I submitted an edit request for the page https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Karren_Brady yesterday at 17:22, which you responded to five minutes later and denied as the request was not submitted correctly. I then submitted the request, plus a second one, correctly, but have had no response. Can you please advise. Thank you. Spen79 (talk) 13:32, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Please leave my edits on the above two articles alone. I genuinely feel that my edits on them are useful. 134.154.20.153 (talk) 17:36, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- You are a sock = end of discussion - Arjayay (talk) 17:39, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
No response to formal edit request
Good morning, I am hoping that you can respond to my query as a matter of urgency. On Sunday, January 8, at 17:22hrs, I submitted a formal edit request in order to correct some factual errors on the following semi-protected page: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Karren_Brady I received a response five minutes later from you, explaining that my request was denied as the request had not been submitted using the correct process. I subsequently re-submitted the request correctly, plus a second request, but have since received no further response, despite leaving a message on your Talk page and another on the page of user Egghead06, who I believe was responsible for originally switching the page to semi-protected. The factual corrections submitted were supported by links to several reliable sources confirming their authenticity, and I would be grateful if someone could contact me as soon as possible to confirm when the requests will be processed. Many thanks Wikipedia User: Spen79
Spen79 (talk) 10:46, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
- Spen79 This had already been done by another editor, before I got to it.
Please note - on Wikipedia, almost nothing is "a matter of urgency", please see There is no deadline.
We are all volunteers, and trying to hound a volunteer to do things faster may result in them deciding not to do it at all.
Why is this edit so urgent? Do you have a conflict of interest? If so please read, and follow, WP:COI - Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 14:42, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Peshwa Bajirao (TV SERIES)
Dear we can't use former cast table here because the show hasn't been yet started on air. You people sitting so far please don't tell us what to do. when you don't even know a bit I am undoing your edit. Raza Murad has left the show go and search the web. Popularistam 17:52, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
- User:Popularistam - It is NOT up to me to "search the web", the WP:BURDEN is entirely on YOU to provide a Reliable source where the information can be verified. If there is any truth in your claim "Raza Murad has left the show" - you must have obtained that from somewhere - assuming that was a reliable source you must cite it, or else stop altering the article.
Please sign all posts on talk pages with 4 tildes ( ~~~~ ) which will add your signature and a timestamp - Arjayay (talk) 18:21, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Addition of Oida script to lead
Hi, did you finish reverting the edits of Chinu9732? You may want to know that an IP 42.110.140.218 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) has reinserted the text in some articles. I've reverted all of those, but there may be others. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 06:05, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks AtHomeIn神戸 - I think they were all dealt with - the latest IP I found was 59.152.123.3 who was active up to 11 January - we wait to try and track down the next language warrer - Arjayay (talk) 13:55, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Spelling
I think "was broadcasted" is correct, because it makes a lot of sense in grammar. --Brynda1231 l Talk Page l Contribs 13:04, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Brynda1231
"Broadcasted" is definitely NOT correct, for the multiple reasons given in the second paragraph at the top of this page. - Arjayay (talk) 13:13, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
:::OK, Either one is right, but I still think it is "Broadcasted". --Brynda1231 l Talk Page l Contribs 18:06, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Terry Redlin
Your reverts are very helpful!
2001:48F8:32:50A:59F5:BAFE:A84:5A8D (talk) 18:36, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- It would be more helpful if you didn't add your unsourced opinions - then editors wouldn't have to go around deleting them - Arjayay (talk) 18:39, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
small question
How do you manage to always fix my "recieved→received" mistake so fast?--Bolter21 (talk to me) 21:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Bolter21 Smaller answer:-
I cover all the Wikipedia:Lists of common misspellings/R and recieve/recieved/reciever/recieving is the most common - so I usually check that twice a day. - Arjayay (talk) 15:36, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
- I had a similar question, now I know. Several years ago, I mistakingly searched "foorball", which led to a correcting-spree of about 10-15 articles. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:07, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
How to use wikipedia account ? Could u tell me Bishal karki karki (talk) 14:29, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Languages of India
Hi, your Edit was helpful in stabilizing! Thank you.
I was curious why the order should have Hindi before English. Considering how even Art. 343 of Constitution of Republic of India, describes that English has been and will continue to remain an Official Language of the Union (or Central Government). A principle then renewed by the Official Languages Act, 1963 which ensured English remained the primary official language even after the proposed period of fifteen years, and continued to be the grand old official Language of India. Before Hindi was considered, and proposed for an official role being included in the Eighth Schedule to the Constitution of India too apart from mention in Art. 343, which it never attained due to Official Languages Act, 1963.
Further, the most significant "Official" document the Constitution which is applicable to both the "Union" and the "States" which might have separate official language respectively, is also in English.
110.227.108.193 (talk) 21:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- The Languages of India article suffers from excessive language warring, editors promoting their language, and/or demoting others. People from the southern states of India, often demote Hindi, presumably as they feel increased use of Hindi will marginalise their local languages. There has, therefore, been a tradition of maintaining the "stable" order on the page.
If you wish the order to be reconsidered, you should make your suggestion, with reasons (as above), at Talk:Languages of India. This can then be discussed and consensus reached on retaining the existing, or changing, the order. If consensus is to change, the article will be re-ordered and the discussion will be used to support the "new" stable version. - Arjayay (talk) 09:28, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you.
(I am not well informed about what opposition to the imposition of Hindi in the Central Government's activities might exist in the southern states of India, but there is a strong movement due to the linguistic identity in the eastern and north eastern states of India too. The strength of some of which can be gauged from Language Martyrs' Day.)
Sincerely,
110.227.108.193 (talk) 16:23, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you.
The contents you restored are not needed and I removed them. The "history" section already talks about former services that served that line. We do not need to put them in the "Extent and Services" section. Also, many other services have served other lines in the past. For example, the V and N also served the IND Queens Boulevard Line, the Q and K served the Sixth Avenue Line, the M and W used to serve the BMT Fourth Avenue Line, the B and W used to service the BMT West End Line, the 1 and 2 used to serve the IRT New Lots Line, the C used to serve the IND Concourse Line, the Q and R used to serve the BMT Astoria Line and so forth. Unless you plan on going to every one of those line articles and put in historical services, there should be no reason these two should have them.
- In regards to the above comment written by 67.84.106.200 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), I tend to agree with their removals, if only because these information are already sourced in the "history" section of each line's article, and the "extent and service" sections of these pages only talk about the current services. epicgenius (talk) 22:50, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Re: Protect It!
What page were we redirecting to? I know that it was on the current chat page but could I get a detail of what other page it was we were "protecting"? NightBot (talk) 16:42, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your edits
Hey Thanks a lot for your help. I am facing constant harassment by an IP hopper who is disrupting other Indian defense related pages as well. You can get a list of those pages from my contributions. Adamgerber80 (talk) 17:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Adamgerber80 - I've added a selection of those pages to my watchlist - hopefully this will give some leads, but almost all the IPs you have recently reverted have 5 edits or fewer, making tracking them across multiple articles quite difficult - I am also no military expert - Arjayay (talk) 18:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Yes the IP uses a VPN and hops IP's making it very difficult to track. Some other pages you might want to match are Sashastra Seema Bal, Defence Intelligence Agency (India), Pinaka multi barrel rocket launcher, Rajput-class destroyer. Thanks. Adamgerber80 (talk) 19:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Assam → Asom
Arjayay, I just wanted to change the "Assam" word to "Asom"[1] in the article Assam . Why you termed it as "Vandalism" ? (talk)debananda nath 09:32, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Debanandanath - Wikipedia uses the COMMON NAME in English, which is Assam, we do not use the "local" or "official" name.
By changing things like List of governors of Assam to List of governors of Asom, or List of Chief Ministers of Assam to List of Chief Ministers of Asom or List of constituencies of Assam Legislative Assembly to List of constituencies of Asom Legislative Assembly, you break all the links, so people cannot find the relevant articles.
I see you have changed this again, and been reverted again, please follow our policies and guidelines and leave it as Assam - Thank-you- Arjayay (talk) 11:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Tata Institute of Social Sciences
May I know the reason why the edits made to Tata Institute of Social Sciences have been reverted. There has been a suggestion that this article has to be divided into multiple articles and the info about deputy directors was obsolete so I updated. I can't see any misinformation. Mahesh432 (talk) 09:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Mahesh432 As stated in my edit summary "Rv unexplained deletions and addition of ELs to bodytext"
To explain that, you deleted two references, and the associated text, without providing any reason, and also added unsourced text. Furthermore, you added 5 external links to the bodytext - although External links should never be added to the body. Please see WP:Verification, WP:Referencing for beginners and Wikipedia:External links - Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 16:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks Arjayay, that was helpful. I would follow these going forward.Mahesh432 (talk) 17:01, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Ho people
{Post moved from top of page and given title}
You have half knowledge about Ho people. Please don't erase their culture and tradition.. Very soon I am adding govt . official documents. You have half knowledge so don't try to edit as per Wikipedia guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unvwiki (talk • contribs) 12:01, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Unvwiki
Firstly, please put new posts at the bottom of the page, including a section title and Please sign all posts on talk pages with 4 tildes ( ~~~~ ) which will add your signature and a timestamp.
Secondly, what I "know" or what you "know" about the Ho people is totally irrelevant - Wikipedia is not at all interested in what people "know", Wikipedia is only interested in reporting what published reliable sources have already said about a subject.
Thirdly, all information added to an article should be Verifiable by providing citations to reliable sources so the information can be checked, by anyone else, at any point in the future. The WP:Burden for providing these sources is on the person adding the information, and any unsupported information can be removed in accordance with the Wikipedia guidelines already mentioned.
- As I have suggested in both my edit summaries and on your talk page, you should read, and follow Help:Referencing for beginners.
Please do not re-add, or add further unsupported information, as this will be deleted, and, if you continue to do this, you are likely to be blocked from editing - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 12:22, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
ELs
Where can I find the prohibition of having ELs in the bodytext? I need a version of Wiki for Dummies! It's too bad that the only possible sourcing that might respond to what the citation demands is prohibited! @Arjayay: Jzsj (talk) 20:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Jzsj please see WP:ELPOINTS No 2 "External links should not normally be used in the body of an article" - Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 20:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- HI. Can't we grant this as an "unnormal" case, since it's the best way we can get rid of the ugly tag in the next couple of years! I would rather not add 4 more "primary" references since these make some editors shudder.@Arjayay: Jzsj (talk) 20:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleting Contents related to Flowers TV
Flowers TV is a licensed and known TV channel in Malayalam which I watch and like a lot. It is noticed that you deleted my entries connected to Flowers TV. May I Know the reason . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikhilrajn (talk • contribs) 12:52, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Nikhilrajn - As stated in my edit summary it was deleted because it was "Totally unsourced"
Everything added to Wikipedia needs to be verifiable by providing citations to reliable sources
- You added the channel owner, the start date, the Chairman and The Managing Director without any references
You then claimed it is "the leading channel in Malayalam" and claimed all shows have "celebrity presence" - both claims would need very good sources, as we do not allow promotional claims or puffery.
Finally you listed "prominant serials" and a "best serial award in the year 2015" again without any sources.
- Please see Help:Referencing for beginners for how to cite sources and please sign all posts on talk pages with 4 tildes ( ~~~~ ) which will add your signature and a timestamp - Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 13:08, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Highlanders
- [Marin Highlanders RFC], is a Multi-program Rugby club, located in Marin, California. Marin Highlanders are one of the Premiere clubs in Northern California, fielding sides from U-8 through varsity.
Was was this reverted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.139.153.2 (talk) 16:11, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- I have already explained this at User talk:12.139.153.2 at 15:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Highlander is a disambiguation page - an index of articles, - however Marin Highlanders or Marin Highlanders RFC does not have an article, so should not be included in an index of articles.
Furthermore, as also explained, External links, such as Marin Highlanders RFC, which link to a website, should not be included in the bodytext of articles, or disambiguation pages. - Arjayay (talk) 16:29, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Thapa
I never added anything, Materialscientist left a message on his profile that Thapa was vandalized on 31st December. I found it and undid it. I never added any references :P Aaryan33056 (talk) 14:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Aaryan33056 - User:Materialscientist said nothing about Thapa on his talk page, and if he wanted to revert something, I'm sure he would have done it by now.
The posts were by User:103.235.197.15 a sock of blocked User:Thapa Kazi999, who was blocked for "Persistent addition of unsourced content" and you have just re-added the same unsourced content - please do not do that again. - Arjayay (talk) 15:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)- Hey, I didn't know that he was a sock, so forgive me there and as for User:Materialscientist and I quote "Sorry to write here but the article Thapa has been vandalised before too on 31 December, 2016 by Damien2016. He has removed all subtopics like Bagaaley Thapaetcs. Plz check and restore all vandalised subtopixs. Best Wishes". It's right on top of his talk page. Aaryan33056 (talk) 15:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, that piece at the top was added by the sock in this edit at 07.05, whilst the section on Vandalism further down the page was added by the sock in this edit at 13.34. I suspect Materialscientist just hasn't noticed it. - Arjayay (talk) 15:14, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hey, I didn't know that he was a sock, so forgive me there and as for User:Materialscientist and I quote "Sorry to write here but the article Thapa has been vandalised before too on 31 December, 2016 by Damien2016. He has removed all subtopics like Bagaaley Thapaetcs. Plz check and restore all vandalised subtopixs. Best Wishes". It's right on top of his talk page. Aaryan33056 (talk) 15:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Iran Section
Dear User, Can i know why Iran is being mentioned bordered by unrecognized N/K even if other countries f.e. Russia there is no mention of Ossetia or Abkhazia? 37.210.159.37 (talk) 06:38, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Dear editor from Doha, I am sorry, but I have no idea what you are talking about - please ask at the talk page of the relevant article. Looking at your contributions, I guess it may be 2014 Latakia offensive - a page I have never edited, - Arjayay (talk) 08:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Yacoub Shaheen
I've created this article. Ethnicity shouldn't be in the article's introduction but in the section "Biography" I've added this in section and then Yacoub belong to, Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs but also Armenians and Greeks (he said this in an interview Wmdly (talk) 14:57, 1 March 2017 (UTC) ).--
- Hi Wmdly - I have just re-read MOS:BLPLEAD and accept that you are right - apologies for my mistake - I have reverted myself. It is a long time since I have read the BLP Lead section, and have noticed other things I have forgotten - like the places of birth and death should not be in the opening brackets, which so many articles have - we live and learn. Apologies again - Arjayay (talk) 15:13, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- There is no problem we all make mistakes. Regards--Wmdly (talk) 15:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Political appointments of Donald Trump
Hi are you Takeing away Under Secretary of the Army on the Political appointments of Donald Trump? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.36.68.29 (talk) 18:25, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Arjay, plz read this
I have a source for g.o.d.: "http://www.allkpop.com/article/2016/08/way-back-wednesday-god-groove-overdose" Ive been using this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.174.35.70 (talk) 17:23, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hello IP from Los Angeles
Please put all new talk-page posts at the bottom, not hidden in the middle of the page. Use the "add topic" tag at the top and give the post a title, Please also sign all posts on talk pages with 4 tildes ( ~~~~ ) which will add your signature and a timestamp.
Secondly, please read and follow Help:Referencing for beginners and include these citations at the same time as you make any additions/alterations to the text.
Finally. please be sure that the citation you add actually includes the information you are adding, without copying the exact text, as that would be a copyright infringement. - Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 17:37, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Would you be interested in helping me with two things?: 1.) I revised g.o.d. and NRG (which im still inserting citations into) because 90s groups have little info such as H.O.T. and g.o.d. I was hoping to update them 2.) there was an article I wanted to create for one korean group thats not on here, but i need an account, which I cant get. could u help me create it, and ill try to work from there? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.174.35.70 (talk) 18:12, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hello IP from Los Angeles
If there is little information, then little can be said, because our articles can only include what has already been published in reliable sources, which need to be cited when the information is added.
I am not sure why you say that you cannot get an account - you are currently editing from a dynamic Time Warner Cable IP - and although the abuse log for that IP here shows that there have been a number of problematic edits, but the IP has never been blocked.
As for writing a new article - I only write articles on subjects I know about - please read WP:Your first article and use the Wikipedia:Article wizard - Arjayay (talk) 18:28, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
1.) Is there a way to recover my edits on g.o.d.?
2.) How do I add pictures in an article?-76.174.35.70 (talk) 03:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hello again IP from Los Angeles - I still don't understand why you don't open an account, but to answer your questions:-
- "Is there a way to recover my edits"
- Every edit to an article is saved in the article's history, ("View history" tab at the top) you can look at, and copy test from, any old version - including the wiki-mark up if you click edit on an old page. If you edit and save an old version, you will over-write any subsequent edits, so your changes are likely to be considered vandalism.
Please do not just re-add the text you used before and stick one reference at the end. Every part of the text you add needs its own reference, which should be added at the same time as the text, and these should be formatted as explained in Help:Referencing for beginners.
- Every edit to an article is saved in the article's history, ("View history" tab at the top) you can look at, and copy test from, any old version - including the wiki-mark up if you click edit on an old page. If you edit and save an old version, you will over-write any subsequent edits, so your changes are likely to be considered vandalism.
- "How do I add pictures in an article?"
- Images are very complicated - please read User:Yunshui/Images for beginners for an overview - the most important points are:-
- Most images on the Web, in magazines or books, are copyright and cannot be used in Wikipedia. If you did not take the picture yourself, it is probably not one that Wikipedia can use. Wikipedia takes WP:COPYRIGHT issues very seriously.
- If you want to upload an image from your computer for use in an article, you must determine the proper license of the image (or whether it is in the public domain). If you know the image is public domain or copyrighted but under a suitable free-license, upload it to the Wikimedia Commons instead of here, so that all projects have access to the image. If you are unsure of the licensing status, see the file upload wizard for more information - But as an IP you cannot upload files to en.wikipedia. Please also read Wikipedia's image use policy.
- If you want to add an image that has already been uploaded to Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons, add
[[File:File name.jpg|thumb|Caption text]]
to the area of the article where you want the image to appear – replacingFile name.jpg
with the actual file name of the image, andCaption text
with a short description of the image. See our picture tutorial for more information. Please note that the file name is case sensitive, so it must be exactly the same -
- Images are very complicated - please read User:Yunshui/Images for beginners for an overview - the most important points are:-
- Try practicing in your sandbox before adding images to an article - as they often go wrong. Good luck - Arjayay (talk) 11:17, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
My article for the South Korean Band, "M. Street" has been submitted for review. What now?76.174.35.70 (talk) 14:59, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- You wait - as it says "This may take a week or more." I am not a new article reviewer, so I can't help - but you can carry-on improving the article whilst it is in the queue.
Two comments:-
- As stated at MOS:ITALIC Major works such as albums should be in italics, like this, whilst minor works, such as songs and singles should be in quotes "like this".
- You have divided the discography into Albums, Singles and Single Albums - I don't know what a Single Album is - is this the Korean for what we would call an Extended play usually known as an EP? i.e. more than 3 tracks, or 30 minutes long, but not a full album? If so you should clarify this. EPs are formatted in italics like albums - so if the EP is known by the same name as the title track, we can tell whether you are talking about the track, or the whole EP, by whether it is in quotes or italics.
- Good luck with the review - Arjayay (talk) 15:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Sadly, it was declined, bcuz apparently, i didnt have enough citations. As for the single albums, ill try to explain in case you see it again. A single album is two different things: a track with an instrumental version (Ex: Kiss Kiss by Ladies Code,) or it is an album with 3-4 tracks (ex: Warrior by B.A.P.) What did you think of the body paragraphs of my article? (Career, suicide of Seohyun, and the last section?)76.174.35.70 (talk) 02:34, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi there from Portugal,
if you notice, I am actually trying to improve the article, it's the creator (User:Jbindoma) who has created a page that has no business existing because player has not yet appeared in a single pro game. The text is also ripe with unref'd POV and very poor English, which I will fix later.
Oh, and the player name is definitely not MANUEL HERRERA LÓPEZ, that's his full name, if you don't let me insert his sporting name (just check his BDFUTBOL profile, Spanish site), at least shorten it to MANUEL HERRERA.
Attentively, happy editing --193.137.135.2 (talk) 14:50, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- I don't think i was unpolite or aggressive in my original message, but fair enough, no reply. I have finished cleaning the piece up now, if you still think the other guy's version is better please revert me again. And i repeat, as of now this is an open and shut case of AFD, as the player does not meet WP:NOTABILITY; ah, and pretty much all the refs (and the LINKS) say his football name is "Súper", but OK, "Manuel Herrera" (and even more, if you want to reinsert the "López" bit) stays.
Attentively (note: the first IP is me editing from work, this one from home. Not trying to avoid anything by IP-hopping, only have these two) --85.242.133.151 (talk) 17:38, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Thapa Kaji (I guess)
Talai dher churna pareko ho hah. Kina badi batho hunchhas. Delete kina garis raakh firta jastako testai. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.34.22.49 (talk) 08:05, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, I have no idea what you are talking about, but I guess it relates to Thapa Kaji, so I added that as the section header
I deleted the images you added to the infobox as that contravened our manual of Style. MOS:NOETHNICGALLERIES states "Articles about ethnic groups or similarly large human populations should not be illustrated by a photomontage or gallery of images of group members" - Arjayay (talk) 09:12, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Formatting on Chi Pu article
Hello there, As I'm sure you have seen, I have been working on editing the Chi Pu article. I am new to editing on Wikipedia and I appreciate your alteration and/or reversion of my edits when they are inappropriate. I see that you noted the format of titles in one of your previous edits on the page. Would you be able to tell me the formatting guidelines regarding the titles of awards? I noted that some award titles in the article are italicized while others are left unformatted. If this is an issue for which a Wiki guideline page exists, I would really appreciate your guidance through a link to that article. If not, please let me know what the proper formatting guidelines are, as I can see you are very involved with this article, as well as Wikipedia in general. Thanks Incurbust (talk) 01:06, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Incurbust - thanks for your post.
The general guidance is Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Text formatting (shortcut MOS:TEXT) - but this does not mention awards at all. I have looked for advice elsewhere, but cannot find any.
I assume you are referring to the edit summary I added "format - songs in quotes but albums, films + series in italics". This is based on the Italic text section of the MOS:TEXT page (Shortcut MOS:ITALIC) which states that italics should be used for "Major works of art and artifice, such as albums, books, video games, films, musicals, operas, symphonies, paintings, sculptures, newspapers, journals, magazines, epic poems, plays, television programs, radio shows" but "Minor works (and any specifically-titled subdivisions of italicized major works) are given in double quotation marks"
In the lack of specific guidance, the first principle should be consistency, they should all be the same. Personally, I would avoid italics, but that is just my personal preference, not a guideline, but please do not use bold, as that would contravene MOS:BOLDFACE. - Arjayay (talk) 11:28, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Revert ?
May I know what caused you to revert my edits on Hyderabad ? I just corrected GDP ranking of Hyderabad (from third- to fifth- to fifth or sixth) as per the already defined sources (PwC rank Hyderabad as sixth, Brookings rank Hyderabad as sixth and the Safe Water Network mention Hyderabad as fifth largest city contributor to India). What is wrong in my edits. Just correcting to what the sources mention. Vibhss (talk) 15:01, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, Vibhss my mistake - I have now read the talk-page and just went in to revert myself and had an edit conflict with you reverting me - Apologies again - Arjayay (talk) 15:05, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Arjayay: It's OK. GDP of Indian cities has been a much discussed topic on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Indian Economy in the result of which it was being agreed to use "range of GDP" as per estimates of different sources (because those estimates varied greatly). This also resulted in using a kind of range for GDP ranking also. Vibhss (talk) 15:24, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- List of Arizona State University alumni
- added links pointing to Mark Bradshaw and Leslie Cliff
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar |
Dear User:Arjayay The Changes I have Made are Explained, (AS RV) Which means reverted vandalism. The Characters (cast) which was added is wrong those actors are not there. Wikipedia Admins does not consider small/blog websites like Patrila News, India Today, Fuzion Show, TellyChakkar, Bollyhunt. These are are used there for reference. Hence it's wrong use of Wikipedia for Publicity. Thanks and I am Again Undoing the changes with valid description I Request you to block this user:Imon Sarker it's a sock/meat puppet you people should start an investigation. PS: I have already given him a warning. PranshiKapoor (talk) 17:32, 12 March 2017 (UTC) |
- Note for the archive - PranshiKapoor was blocked as a sockpuppet of User:Theactingeeker
A barnstar for you!
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | ||
Thank you for your constant spelling and grammar checks. I'm forever noticing you correcting mine and for that, I am grateful! Soaper1234 (talk) 17:48, 12 March 2017 (UTC) |
Warning vandals
Hi! Thank you for removing vandalism on Xbox Live. In the future, could you also leave a warning (in the form of for example {{uw-vandalism1}}) on the vandals' talk page? That makes it easier for other editors to keep track of the amount of vandalism committed by the vandal, and it gives a stronger argument for administrators to block them from editing. Thanks! Rchard2scout (talk) 14:10, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Rola Dashti
Hi Ajay
I am really disappointed as you keep changing my modification as this is my information as I am Dr. Dashti. So please stay out of this page. Sdashti (talk) 10:42, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
- Sdashti - Thank you for admitting that you are Dr. Dashti.
As already explained on your user-page, this means you have a conflict of interest. It is, therefore, not me that should "stay out of this page" but you. You should NOT be editing OUR page about you.
Please follow the advice given on your user page and suggest alterations, citing reliable sources at Talk:Rola Dashti - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 10:51, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Hey Arjayay! SDashti has now taken this to ANI if you'd like to chip in. MM ('"HURRRR?) (Hmmmmm.) 12:04, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
So
I was about to do this edit [1], remembered you... and changed my spelling :P You´ve made an impact. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:21, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Gråbergs Gråa Sång Lol. So - one down and 30,455,454 to go (there are currently 30,455,456 registered users, minus you and me) ! - Arjayay (talk) 08:33, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Well, if that´s your goal, it´s a bit of challenge (dead ones, abandoned account ones, don´t speak english ones, millions of other problematic ones), but maybe it´s more of stars/treetops thing. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:42, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Regarding Ayurveda
Hi, Please check this out on Ayurveda Talk page.
A preliminary clinical trial in 2011, funded in part by NCCIH, found that conventional and Ayurvedic treatments for rheumatoid arthritis had similar effectiveness. The conventional drug tested was methotrexate and the Ayurvedic treatment included 40 herbal compounds. [1]Knightplex (talk) 19:08, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
I posted it here at the end. I think the source is reliable. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Ayurveda#Semi-protected_edit_request_on_18_July_2016
Knightplex (talk) 09:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Knightplex - I am no expert on WP:MEDRS sources, but we often/usually want more than one source, reporting more than one trial, I suggest you start a specific section at Talk:Ayurveda - Arjayay (talk) 09:54, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Yo Ho Ho
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b4/Ananuri_in_Jan_2013_02.jpg/150px-Ananuri_in_Jan_2013_02.jpg)
Iryna Harpy (talk) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec16a}} to your friends' talk pages.
Ajay V/Kolly Empire spam
Hey, I know you have done a lot of anti-vandalism work with the Ajay V spam, so I wanted to let you know I opened an SPI but may need to take it over to ANI. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vithursan777 Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Spurs season 2006-07
I would be grateful if the changes made to the Tottenham Hotspur season 2006-07 page are not reversed, as the edits made today provide more detailed information than the older version (which was not detailed enough). My changes also make the page consistent with the layout/detail level for preceding Tottenham seasons. Many thanks.
can I edit crips page
The membership is wrong in 1999 the membership was 35,000 so 2017 80,000 Moneymake10000000r (talk) 04:48, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Moneymake10000000r why do you think it is 80,000? Which reliable source have you got that information from? Arjayay (talk) 17:29, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Look up how powerful street gangs are on YouTube Thanks skip 0:56 to see the number Moneymake10000000r (talk) 17:33, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Did you get the link Moneymake10000000r (talk) 18:00, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Moneymake10000000r - You haven't said which video, and YouTube is rather too big to guess which one you mean. More importantly, who made the video? as many (if not most) of the videos uploaded to YouTubetube are not reliable sources, so cannot be used. - Arjayay (talk) 18:06, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
You got the link now Moneymake10000000r (talk) 18:13, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
(Note that this has already been discussed at Talk:Crips#Wrong_membership.) --McGeddon (talk) 18:14, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Marwadi University Page
Hey I had been putting information about the courses offered by Marwadi university. But now the page has been deleted. If you guys had a problem you could have deleted the content but there was no need of deleting the page. I request you to please made the page live atleast. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richa1011 (talk • contribs) 10:54, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- Richa1011 - I did not delete, and cannot reinstate, the page, as I am not an admin.
The page was deleted by User:DGG who you could ask, however, as it was deleted as "Unambiguous advertising", they may well refuse to do so.
As I recall (I can't see the page, or the page history) vast amounts of non-encyclopedic, promotional, information such as course content and admission criteria were being added, and re-added. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, NOT the place to advertise a college and paste its prospectus.
I suspect you have a conflict of interest, so should not be editing that article in any case. Furthermore, if you are editing that page as part of your job, you are a paid editor, the Wikimedia Foundation terms of use require you to make a formal disclosure. - Arjayay (talk) 11:12, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Tarek Fatah Page
I have added the issues of DMY dates and "Indian English" to to the Tarek Fatah talk page. I do not understand why an article about a Canadian, living and working in Canada, would be assigned DMY and non-Canadian English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newimpartial (talk • contribs) 00:42, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Newimpartial, thanks for the notification, I have replied at Talk:Tarek Fatah - Arjayay (talk) 09:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Uebert Angel
Hi @Arjay I have an issue with some edits on Uebert Angel page can you please assist? The article is not fair. Some of the facts are backed by unreliable sources and bogus online newspapers. Especially the article being used to justify that Uebert Angel was known as Mudzanire. The article itself is a lie. Uebert Angel has a finance degree from Salford University. He is an anointed man of God. Would it not be fair to expand this article in a better way as a biography because at the moment it's not saying much on there. Its surprising how everyone there is trying to argue about him being named Mudzanire before but no one cares to expand the article. Buna21 (talk) 13:30, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Buna21 - I don't know why, as your very first edit, you have chosen to ask me about Uebert Angel - an article I have never edited, and know nothing about. If you have concerns you need to raise them at Talk:Uebert Angel if you cannot resolve them with the other editors, or they do not reply, then please read about your options at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution - Arjayay (talk) 13:42, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Vizag
Why you changed the page again as worldlistmania is saying vizag is having 48 billion dollar gdp Sai krishna 98 (talk) 17:16, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Sai krishna 98 - as I explained in my edit summary, Worldlistmania is NOT a reliable source so cannot be used as a reference for information in Wikipedia. - Arjayay (talk) 17:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Mistakes
The GDP is not at all correct that what You are editing.It is a long back gdp Sai krishna 98 (talk) 15:44, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- Sai krishna 98 it is far better that we have a slightly older, but accurate, figure; than one from a source that is not reliable. This was explained to you on 21 March, above. You seem unduly concerned about these figures - so the WP:BURDEN is on you to find a more recent reliable source that is acceptable. To keep re-adding an unreliable source is disruptive editing/vandalism. If you continue these re-additions you are likely to be blocked, so please don't - Arjayay (talk) 16:00, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Mistake
Why didn't you edit Visakhapatnam as 8th largest economy Sai krishna 98 (talk) 15:54, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Giving valid proof
Now I had given a best proof as the Andhra Pradesh electronics and Information technology[A department of Andhra Pradesh Government posted in Facebook that Visakhapatnam is the 8th largest economy of India.Is this sufficient enough for you Sai krishna 98 (talk) 18:39, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- Sai krishna 98 none of your links work, so we have no idea what the references say, or even if they are real.
They certainly do not WP:Verify the information you have added, which should, therefore, be deleted.
Please read Help:Referencing for beginners and provide links to the precise pages that you are trying to cite, not the front page of a site such as www.trak.in. Arjayay (talk) 18:52, 27 March 2017 (UTC)- I see that another editor, User:Mlpearc, has already deleted your additions to Surat for precisely that reason - your "references" do not support the "information" that you keep re-adding - Arjayay (talk) 18:58, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Urgent reply needed
I didn't understand what is your reply.I have a reference given by Arun prabhu Desai.Even you are changing the content repeatedly.And the next point is why are you not deleting the word 8th [vizag is the 8th largest economy]even your article is saying vizag is in 10th place.At last,give a reply about this matter. Sai krishna 98 (talk) 13:42, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
- Sai krishna 98 - As I have repeatedly explained, on this page, on your talk page, and in my edit summaries, you are NOT adding references - you are adding a collection of letters which are NOT references as they do not link directly to the website page where you found the information. We cannot, therefore, verify that the information is correct, so, as one of our fundamental rules is that all information has to be verifiable, we cannot keep your additions that in the article.
These are Wikipedia's rules, not my rules, and other very experienced editors, such as User:Mlpearc, User:Vin09 and User:Davey2010 have all reverted your additions for the same reason.
As I suggested above, please read Help:Referencing for beginners and provide links to the precise pages that you obtained your information from. Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 14:00, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Sorry
I am extremely sorry if I hurt you.Sorry for disturbing Sai krishna 98 (talk) 16:22, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- Sai krishna 98 - Thank you for your apology, which I accept. Please be careful with your edits in future, as your Talk-page includes three final warnings. - Arjayay (talk) 09:46, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Reason
Visakhapatnam article says"Visakhapatnam is the tenth largest economy in India.Economy of Visakhapatnam article says"Visakhapatnam is the 8th largest in economy.Why there are two different ranks given for the same city?What is the correct one? Sai krishna 98 (talk) 11:26, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Sai krishna 98 - They both cite the same reference - this one[1] - which clearly states 10th, so I have altered the Economy of Visakhapatnam article to accord with that reference. - Arjayay (talk) 11:34, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
References
- ^ Nicole Bippen (17 February 2014). "The 10 Richest Indian Cities". The Richest. Retrieved 15 July 2014.
Cyndago
I wrote a wikipedia article about Cyndago, and it is currently waiting for submission. If you have the time, could u revise it and tell me what to fix?76.174.35.70 (talk) 17:52, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Link: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Cyndago — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.174.35.70 (talk) 17:53, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Clouds
New clouds (Asperitis) and ten more. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/03/eleven-new-clouds-atlas/
Have a nice weekend ;-) Bigdaddy (talk) 19:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Plot section
Hey, I am new to editing Wikipedia and I have a doubt. In Wikipedia, articles require reliable sources for information to be put up. However, there are no sources for the Plot of movies and books. The reason might be encouraging people to read the book or watch the movie. Whatever it may be, there are just no references. In that case, What to be done ? I have recently come across many articles without sources for Plot. Awaiting your reply. 2.51.19.218 (talk) 11:48, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Hello IP in Dubai - you are right, it is confusing, we go on and on about requiring references in every other article, and in the rest of the article about the film or book.
Essentially, however, plots of films and books are self verifying. If you want to check that the description is correct, you can read the book or see the film, to verify the information.
Although magazines etc. often summarize a film, we cannot copy their description because of copyright, and they will not have a very detailed description that we could précis following the ruling in Twin Peaks Productions v. Publications International - see WP:COPYRIGHTPLOT for more information. This is also one of the reasons we limit film plot summaries to between 400 and 700 words as WP:FILMPLOT.
Before launching into writing a plot please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction in particular the two sections MOS:FICTIONPLOT and MOS:PLOT. - Arjayay (talk) 12:18, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Kevin Kiely
I made an edit to Kevin Kiely (poet) before realizing that you had (sort of) rejected the same edit. I still feel that the lead is not the proper place for those words and feel that even placement in the main body the article requires pretty strong sourcing, but I'm open to starting a discussion to see how we should handle this. I don't want you to review my edit as a rejection of your review — I entertain the request as part of an email from the subject (OTRS) and felt that part of the request was warranted.--S Philbrick(Talk) 19:05, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Sphilbrick - Erm - I don't seem to have edited Kevin Kiely (poet) - unless the Wikihistory bot is wrong - could you please give me the diff? - Arjayay (talk) 19:09, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- diff Not the article, but the talk page.--S Philbrick(Talk) 19:14, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Rabidas Behera
I made an edit on Odia language and you warned me of possible vandalism . My mother tongue is Odia and I am from Odisha. You can literally see people from other regions like User talk:বঙ্গভূমি and other anonymous persons are simply adding Bengali and Ho language in articles pertaining to Odisha. You can know about Ho and Bengali population in Odisha districts by logging to Odisha government site .Their population is simply negligible as compared to Odia and tribal population like Santhali and Khondhs. So I am literally protecting my state Odisha related pages from possible vandalism thereby not promoting any language . I want to simply protect and improve the standard of Odisha related pages.
If this is an issue for which a Wiki guideline page exists, I would really appreciate your guidance through a link to articles that I had edited. If not, please let me know what the proper formatting guidelines are, as I can see you are very involved with articles edited by me, as well as Wikipedia in general. Rabidas (talk) 07:18, 06 April 2017 (UTC)
- Answered at User talk:Rabidas - Arjayay (talk) 14:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Geo tv
I request u to edit Geo Tv Wikipedia page too because no one is taking responsibility of that Biclorf.kok (talk) 08:08, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Biclorf.kok - I am not sure what problems you can see at Geo TV - it has far more references than most other articles on Pakistani TV stations, and includes a criticism/controversy section, so it is not overtly promotional unlike many TV articles. In any case you have over 150 edits and have never edited Geo TV at all - Arjayay (talk) 17:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Biclorf.kok - looking further, I assume you are actually talking about List of programs broadcast by Geo TV, which has a number of problems. It has no references whatsoever, it has an entirely unsourced "upcoming" programmes section contrary to WP:CRYSTAL and includes programme times contrary to WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Furthermore, it appears that you have been adding much of this unsourced information - why are you asking me to edit that page? as I will just remove much of the "information" you have added. - Arjayay (talk) 17:46, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Please don't try to edit Geo TV Wikipedia page again because you are changing the format of that and putting insensible things in it. Biclorf.kok (talk) 07:20, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- No Biclorf.kok - You need to stop editing that page, as you keep re-adding things contrary to Wikipedias rules and guidelines - all I am doing is reverting your changes, which, as you know are against our rules and guidelines - as explained to you here and in my edit summaries. What is more, looking at your edit history, it appears that you probably have a conflict of interest, so should not be editing that page at all - Arjayay (talk) 11:28, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
If u want to add something you can but please don't change the format like for example Khaali haath (Monday 8:00 p.m) like this if u keep on doing this u will be blocked permanently from that page so please stop it last warning for you
- No Biclorf.kok, you have been blocked, for repeatedly contravening WP:NOTTVGUIDE, WP:V and WP:CRYSTAL. This block is only for a day, but if you continue to break our rules and guidelines, when you are allowed to edit again, your next block will be longer, or even permanent, so please don't - Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 19:08, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Stop editing every page thats none of your concern mind your own buisness now u change the format u will be blocked permanently from editing stop runing the page next time don't do it please I request u please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biclorf.kok (talk • contribs) 10:18, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- No Biclorf.kok, as clearly shown by the fact that you have already been blocked twice, once for a day, the second time for a week, you are the one vandalizing our pages by repeatedly contravening WP:NOTTVGUIDE, WP:V and WP:CRYSTAL. As stated above - if you continue, your next block will be longer, or even permanent.
Could you please explain why any pages are "none of my concern" and why I should "mind my own business"; presumably, you think that these pages are your concern? Why is that? - Arjayay (talk) 11:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Then don't remove the upcoming program or change the format if u want then just add something and its my concern this is my job and next time don't even try to block me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biclorf.kok (talk • contribs) 17:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Biclorf.kok, thank you for admitting that "this is my job"
Not only are you breaking our rules on WP:NOTTVGUIDE, WP:V and WP:CRYSTAL, but you are breaking one our fundamental terms of use WP:PAID:-
"The Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require that all editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which they receive, or expect to receive, compensation"
You have not done this and you will, most certainly, be blocked if you continue editing without complying with these requirements. - Arjayay (talk) 18:13, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
User:Humtvdramaedit &co.
Hi. I noticed your COI posts to their talk page and thought you'd like to know that the user and some apparent associates may be found at WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Humtv. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 04:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Help at Discussion
Hi. Can you please join this discussion ? Though I have pointed out most of the facts to the user who started this discussion, I need to have more viewpoints and a sort of consensus. Your help will be appreciated in this matter. Vibhss (talk) 16:50, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Kiran (Geo Kahani)
Hello Arjayay. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kiran (Geo Kahani), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 cannot be applied to movies or TV shows. Thank you. SoWhy 16:52, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Bhadrachalam
Thanks for the heads up, re: this and this edit. They were helpful indeed. I've fixed the issues and am hopeful that the rest is fine. :) ** Pavan Jandhyala ** 18:00, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Watchlist
Just watchlist Jangaon, Telangana. The user adding WP:OR. I've cleaned and added good ref.--Vin09 (talk) 07:19, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Oh no, another entry on the "broadcasted" debate...
Hello, I'm not trying to start an argument, just make a point on this. (My personal pet peeve is "begs the question," - does no one not know how to correctly use this anymore?). I suspect this is one of those British v. American things, as my dictionary (American) gives broadcasted as acceptable, although it seems to matter in what manner it's used. For example, one could say, "The seed was broadcast last week on the south forty," as opposed to, "The radio station broadcasted Beethoven's Ninth without commercial interruption."
Even wikitionary doesn't entirely say it can't be used, but that raises another question: is wikitionary considered a reliable source?
Feel free to delete this if you consider it too banal to keep on your page - I shan't complain. Sincerely, Justin Namen (talk) 20:46, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Justin Namen - thanks for your post - this was discussed at length about 7 or 8 years ago, but I can't find the discussion at the moment. I know broadcasted is in some dictionaries, as I state above:-
- Broadcasted appears in some dictionaries, but others, e.g. Chambers state "Sorry, no entries for Broadcasted were found".
Broadcast appears in all dictionaries, and should be used as COMMONALITY - "Wikipedia tries to find words that are common to all varieties of English".
- Broadcasted appears in some dictionaries, but others, e.g. Chambers state "Sorry, no entries for Broadcasted were found".
- And don't get me started on "Rebroadcasted" .....(let's not start a sentence beginning "and" debate) - Arjayay (talk) 07:40, 12 April 2017 (UTC)