User talk:ArchidamusIII

Welcome!

Hello, ArchidamusIII, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Greyjoy^talk 22:48, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your message and for the links! I still have a lot of things to learn, but I hope that I will be able to make some useful contributions, sooner or later!

ArchidamusIII (talk) 22:19, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Orestis Mastakas (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Orestis Mastakas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArchidamusIII! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Luben.tv

Hello ArchidamusIII,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Luben.tv for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Charsaddian (talk) 11:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:1st email - edited.png

Thanks for uploading File:1st email - edited.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Democratic Renewal Initiative - New Democracy Student Movement moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Democratic Renewal Initiative - New Democracy Student Movement. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because huge example of Citekil. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you very much for taking the time to read the article, I sincerely appreciate it.

I will remove most of the citations right away then. After resolving this issue, will the article be acceptable? (There is already an equivalent wikipedia page in the Greek language:

https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%94%CE%B7%CE%BC%CE%BF%CE%BA%CF%81%CE%B1%CF%84%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%AE_%CE%91%CE%BD%CE%B1%CE%BD%CE%B5%CF%89%CF%84%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%AE_%CE%A0%CF%81%CF%89%CF%84%CE%BF%CF%80%CE%BF%CF%81%CE%AF%CE%B1_-_%CE%9D%CE%AD%CE%B1_%CE%94%CE%B7%CE%BC%CE%BF%CE%BA%CF%81%CE%B1%CF%84%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%AE_%CE%A6%CE%BF%CE%B9%CF%84%CE%B7%CF%84%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%AE_%CE%9A%CE%AF%CE%BD%CE%B7%CF%83%CE%B7)

ArchidamusIII (talk) 16:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Democratic Renewal Initiative - New Democracy Student Movement (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

" reputable outlets over the years. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]" is a prime example of WP:CITEKILL. Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. Three is not a target, it's a limit. Aim for one. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder. In reality this is WP:BOMBARD

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Democratic Renewal Initiative - New Democracy Student Movement and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About your use of "thanks" messages

Hey ArchidamusIII, I notice you've been using the "thanks" feature a lot on the articles you've created, which I love to see! However, it does tend to flood my inbox when I receive five or six of these in quick succession. You don't need to react on every single edit to the article; editors will know that you've seen their changes with just one message. If you find an editor out there you think is particularly deserving of appreciation, you can always leave them a talk page message featuring a WikiLove template of your choice. Let me know if you have any questions! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Many thanks for letting me know! (And thanks for taking the time to read through my articles by the way.) I am not very familiar with Wikipedia "social norms" to be honest, as I joined recently. But I'll have it in mind next time!

ArchidamusIII (talk) 23:36, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Independent Student Movements of Greece moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Independent Student Movements of Greece. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar and it is incomplete and requires more sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 19:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Marcus,

Thank you very much for taking the time to read the article, I sincerely appreciate it.

- Could you please specify some of the grammar and language issues that you identified? I had checked my text at ChatGPT, so this should not be the case. (Some minor mistakes could exist here and there, but is should not be the case in general.)

- Regarding the timeline-statistics, I did not cite the sources, because they are the same as above. Should I include them in the table as well?

- Regarding the notability tag, I though that since other student parties like BLOCO (associated with Syriza) or Democratic Renewal Initiative – New Democracy Student Movement (associated with New Democracy) have their own page, the Independant Student Movements should also be equally noteworthy to have a page. (None of them deserves a page on its own, I suppose, but all of them combined should be equally notable to Bloco or Democratic Renewal Initialtive)

Thank you very much in advance for your time!

ArchidamusIII (talk) 20:25, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Independent Student Movements of Greece

Hello ArchidamusIII, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Independent Student Movements of Greece, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independent Student Movements of Greece.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MicrobiologyMarcus}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 14:43, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thanks for taking the time to read the article! I just posted a lengthy response in the deletion discussion. (If you have any suggestions on how to improve the article by the way, please let me know!)

ArchidamusIII (talk) 16:40, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Democratic Renewal Initiative – New Democracy Student Movement for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Democratic Renewal Initiative – New Democracy Student Movement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Democratic Renewal Initiative – New Democracy Student Movement until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:25, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know, and for taking the time to read the article! I will try to find some time to expand it over the following days. There is an equivalent article in the Greek wikipedia: https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%94%CE%B7%CE%BC%CE%BF%CE%BA%CF%81%CE%B1%CF%84%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%AE_%CE%91%CE%BD%CE%B1%CE%BD%CE%B5%CF%89%CF%84%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%AE_%CE%A0%CF%81%CF%89%CF%84%CE%BF%CF%80%CE%BF%CF%81%CE%AF%CE%B1_-_%CE%9D%CE%AD%CE%B1_%CE%94%CE%B7%CE%BC%CE%BF%CE%BA%CF%81%CE%B1%CF%84%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%AE_%CE%A6%CE%BF%CE%B9%CF%84%CE%B7%CF%84%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%AE_%CE%9A%CE%AF%CE%BD%CE%B7%CF%83%CE%B7

ArchidamusIII (talk) 18:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]