User talk:Appalachianjournal

Welcome!

Hello, Appalachianjournal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 09:53, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Folkstreams screenshot.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Folkstreams screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:57, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Tom Davenport (July 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Tom Davenport.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sionk (talk) 21:01, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tom Davenport (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tom Davenport and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 09:49, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Appalachianjournal, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 09:49, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Appalachianjournal", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it is that of an organisation not that of an individual. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle 09:54, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 20:22, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Appalachianjournal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

rachellen44 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Sorry for my failure to understand username rules. I am an individual acting alone and would like to revise my name to reflect that. Thank you! Appalachianjournal (talk) 18:27, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Thank you for your responses to concerns below. Congratulations! You are unblocked.

Before you do anything else on Wikipedia, please go to WP:CHU/Simple to request a change of your username. After the change, carry on, and happy editing. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:59, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That name would be OK. But consider ...

Here are a few key questions:

Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
Do you understand conflict of interest?
Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above. Daniel Case (talk) 00:53, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To Daniel Case: Yes, I understand these policies. Like I said, I am an individual not associated with the organization in my original name.

To Daniel Case and Alexf, 9/22/14, is there anything else I need to do, or is it just a matter of waiting for the name change and unblock? I cannot ask that question anywhere else except on my own page, due to the block... Thank you.

No, I don't believe you fully understand those policies and guidelines linked above, particularly Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. So I have one more question: What is your association with the subject of Draft:Tom Davenport? Note that when you created an account, you agreed to abide by the terms of service that require you to disclose any conflict of interest that you may have. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:48, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep things cordial, Amatulić. This is a case of misunderstanding, for which I have apologized. And I am happy to explain my interest in Tom Davenport! I am from the Appalachian region and am greatly appreciative of any and all artists (be they novelists, poets, filmmakers, playwrights, etc), that strive to depict Appalachia in a way that is truthful to the region, and does not further problematic stereotypes. My "motive" in writing about Tom Davenport is not a personal relationship (never met the guy!), but rather an appreciation for his work. The article itself should attest to the fact that I'm not biased in this regard, as it is a highly fact-based, not at all slanted representation of his work, with all the proper sources. It was going through a (hopefully) final round of editing many weeks ago until my username became an issue. Again, I apologize for my misunderstanding of name rules. I had no idea this would be such a huge deal, or else obviously I would not have chosen the name in the first place. I should have looked into it. I would still like to change the name to what I requested above, and continue with the submission. But, again, it was to further positive depictions of where I'm from, so if it is going to be turn into a huge investigation of sorts, I'll just chalk it up to time wasted and leave it at that. Thanks to Daniel Case and Alexf for the patient explanations.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tom Davenport (filmmaker) has been accepted

Tom Davenport (filmmaker), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The herald 16:03, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]