User talk:Apmh/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Apmh. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Concern regarding Draft:Payload Studios
Hello, The Tips of Apmh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Payload Studios, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Face Lift (video)
Hello, The Tips of Apmh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Face Lift (video), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Face Lift (video)
Hello, The Tips of Apmh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Face Lift".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:38, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Payload Studios
Hello, The Tips of Apmh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Payload Studios".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:28, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
"Racism against white people" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Racism against white people and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 4#Racism against white people until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 23:55, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
"Jake chudnow" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Jake chudnow has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 8 § Jake chudnow until a consensus is reached. TartarTorte 18:41, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
No such thing as Sources
See WP:Referencing for beginners how to create properly formatted references and how to insert those into the relevant text so as to show up as superscripted references. David notMD (talk) 17:47, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- I see by your Archived Talk you are not a beginner, but comment applies - references, not "Sources". David notMD (talk) 17:55, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- @David notMD Hi, thank you for notifying me-I changed it (it seems like you forgot to after messaging me). Just so you understand, inline citations popular but it's not a guideline or policy. It is even less neccessary in drafts where the page's content is still being created and thus footnotes would constantly need to adapt. Apmh 19:25, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- All for naught unless the Speedy deletion is opposed. David notMD (talk) 20:06, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- @David notMD The subject's notable, the creator did a good job with having no promo writing. Deletion is just unneccessary. Suprising that it's an admin who's requesting it -- Apmh 20:40, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- You are mistaken, the draft Draft:Michael Leiters clearly gives zero indication of notability is poorly sourced, is promotional and is undisclosed paid editing. Theroadislong (talk) 21:02, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Theroadislong The draft is definitely not "unambiguously promotional" as required in CSD. There is definitely some weird writing but it can be fixed.
There are far more sources than just the 3 I put on there, and nontheless a lack of references is not a valid deletion criteria.
Also, how do you know that it is paid editing? Apmh 21:15, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Theroadislong The draft is definitely not "unambiguously promotional" as required in CSD. There is definitely some weird writing but it can be fixed.
- You are mistaken, the draft Draft:Michael Leiters clearly gives zero indication of notability is poorly sourced, is promotional and is undisclosed paid editing. Theroadislong (talk) 21:02, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- @David notMD The subject's notable, the creator did a good job with having no promo writing. Deletion is just unneccessary. Suprising that it's an admin who's requesting it -- Apmh 20:40, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- All for naught unless the Speedy deletion is opposed. David notMD (talk) 20:06, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- @David notMD Hi, thank you for notifying me-I changed it (it seems like you forgot to after messaging me). Just so you understand, inline citations popular but it's not a guideline or policy. It is even less neccessary in drafts where the page's content is still being created and thus footnotes would constantly need to adapt. Apmh 19:25, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
You can remove the Speedy deletion by removing the top line of the draft (has db-spam) in it. Will help if you also make an entry on the Talk page that you intend to improve the wording and add properly formatted references. Be aware that two of the three proposed references are to the McLaren website, hence not independent and not contributing to Wikipedia-notability. David notMD (talk) 22:16, 2 June 2023 (UTC)