User talk:Anti-draftifier

October 2023

Hello, I'm Apparition11. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Krusty Krab have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Apparition^{11 Complaints}/Mistakes 11:17, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello. After renames, it is appropriate for the old username to redirect to the new username. For the U2 speedy, it states This excludes userpages for anonymous users who have edited, redirects from misspellings of an established user's userpage, and the previous name of a renamed user. The G11 speedy was inappropriate because there was no promotion on the page, it was simply a redirect. Apparition^{11 Complaints}/Mistakes 22:21, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello. You are right about the exceptions to the U2 speedy, but there is no proof or even sign that Amaury has been renamed from Eugene Krabs. In addition, what I mean by the G11 speedy is that Amaury wanted to promote himself, and that is the reason he created a redirect from a nonexistent user page to his own, and did the same to the corresponding talk page. Anti-draftifier (talk) 22:34, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

The page is on my watchlist because I met him when that was his username. I have no idea why the logs don't show it, but here is the accepted rename request: Wikipedia:Changing_username/Simple/Archive65#Eugene_Krabs_→_Zhang_He. Apparition^{11 Complaints}/Mistakes 22:39, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, but this is the Eugene Krabs rename to Zhang He, not the Eugene Krabs rename to Amaury. Eugene Krabs might have been first renamed to Zhang He, and then to Amaury. If this is the case, could you please send me the second rename? Also, I am sorry for the unneeded and probably annoying repetition. Anti-draftifier (talk) 22:46, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Changing_username/Usurpations/Completed/18#Zhang_He_→_Donald_Duck, Wikipedia:Changing_username/Simple/Archive83#Donald_Duck_→_Zhou_Yu, Wikipedia:Changing_username/Usurpations/Completed/36#Zhou_Yu_→_Amaury. Apparition^{11 Complaints}/Mistakes 22:51, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Oh, it looks like that user has been renamed quite few times! Thank you very much for all the proof! Since there is proof, we can definitely keep the redirects, instead of nominating them for deletion. Also, I will not modify your comments again! Anti-draftifier (talk) 23:00, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

WP:NOTHERE/Block evasion

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 11:34, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello @Ohnoitsjamie:. I would like to ask you a clarification about your action, and you are expected to answer. Is there any evidence suggesting that I am a sockpuppet of @Abladifferentblausername:? Anti-draftifier (talk) 13:31, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for reminding me of my admin duties. Your activities are a WP:DUCK match for that user, hence the tag on your user page. The odds of an unrelated user making similar redirect changes to Talk page and Vermissen are extremely low. [1][2]. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:49, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anti-draftifier (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear @Ohnoitsjamie,
As you already know, I have been confirmed a sockpuppet of @Abladifferentblausername by the CheckUser @Mailer diablo. I apologize for abusively using multiple accounts, but I think I should point out the following: Most edits I have made using this account are useful, and the edits to Talk page and Vermissen were not made for the purpose of disruption, but for the purpose of accuracy; that is, to redirect users closer to what they are looking for. For instance, users that are looking for the Vermissen song can get closer to its entry in the Juju (German rapper) article by following the Juju (German rapper)#Singles hyperlink than by following the Juju (German rapper)#Discography hyperlink.

As I see it, the sole reason I got blocked is that I was abusively using multiple accounts, and the accusation of making unconstructive edits using this account is false. I understand that sockpuppetry is taboo on Wikipedia, but, in my opinion, it is fair that I get unblocked because I have changed since I started using this account.

Yours sincerely,
Anti-draftifier (talk) 11:56, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
PS: I wish you a happy WikiBirthday!

Decline reason:

By definition, every edit made with a block-evading sockpuppet account is abusive. We will not consider an unblock request here, you'll need to make it with your original account. There's almost no chance it'll be granted there at this time, given how recently you were evading your block. Yamla (talk) 12:04, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There's no reason to unblock you if you intend to continue to make disruptive edits. If you create another account to mess with Vermissen, that account will be blocked as well. Additionally, I fail to see how any of the redirect edits you made were useful per WP:NOTBROKEN. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:03, 17 October 2023 (UTC)