User talk:Anotherpioneer
|
Disambiguation link notification for June 7
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chief Wahoo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fourteenth Amendment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 17
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Boris Johnson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 22
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chief Wahoo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Lucas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Re: Subject of June 2013 Cleveland Frowns blog entry
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
Message added 00:15, 1 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
JPM telling some whoppers!
[edit]Thanks for the info in your posting... I'm sensing a pattern here?
- ,Federal Bureau of Investigation and prosecutors in Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara's office
- Deliberately withholding information from investigators or lying during interviews conducted as part of an investigation is considered obstruction of justice, a criminal offense
- July 31 letter to FERC from Massachusetts Senators Elizabeth Warren and Edward Markey, both Democrats. The letter asked FERC about why it had allowed JPMorgan to settle the case without admitting wrongdoing
- why no individual executives faced regulatory action
- The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (a/k/a Carl Levin) is also looking into issues surrounding the FERC case, including whether the bank or any of its employees lied to regulators
Speaking of lying, telling whoppers, withholding information from investigators AND SHAREHOLDERS!
- 2012 JPMorgan Chase trading loss
- http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/22/business/secs-new-chief-promises-tougher-line-on-cases.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
- http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/08/08/inquiry-into-jpmorgans-trading-loss-enters-final-stage/
- http://www.ajc.com/weblogs/jay-bookman/2013/aug/09/neither-admitting-nor-denying-guilt-card/
Rick (talk) 00:25, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Chief Wahoo
[edit]Hey I recently stumbled upon the Chief Wahoo article and seen that you greatly expanded it. Great work! Nice point on the debate over Chief Wahoo, on both sides. You seem to have a keen interest on Native American mascots in general. Keep up the good work! Jgera5 (talk) 17:23, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
I'm awarding you this barnstar for continuous expansion on the Chief Wahoo article with well-sourced, thoughtful insights on such a controversial topic. Jgera5 (talk) 17:23, 26 September 2013 (UTC) |
Split of Chief Wahoo
[edit]I have been working for a few days on this and would like some other opinions.FriendlyFred (talk) 21:30, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Animated Chief Wahoo cheers a home run on Cleveland stadium scoreboard.png listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Animated Chief Wahoo cheers a home run on Cleveland stadium scoreboard.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Animated Chief Wahoo cheers a home run on Cleveland stadium scoreboard.png
[edit]![⚠](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Ambox_warning_blue.svg/35px-Ambox_warning_blue.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Animated Chief Wahoo cheers a home run on Cleveland stadium scoreboard.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Anotherpioneer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Anotherpioneer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)