User talk:Anoop Balakumar

May 2018

Hello, I'm Bonadea. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Rajesh Khanna seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 06:52, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dileep has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dileep was changed by Anoop Balakumar (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854641 on 2018-06-02T10:15:43+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:15, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Janapriyanayakan

Janapriyanayakan Dileep is Official title of Dileep which is used in movies ... Make it clear I edited wikipedia and add his title to it You remove the title from wikipedia Why Anoop Balakumar (talk) 10:19, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have failed to provide any reliable sources to support the claim. —C.Fred (talk) 02:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Dileep, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 06:14, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Janapriyanayakan

https://www.google.com/search?q=janpriyanayakan&client=ms-android-hmd-rev2&prmd=mvin&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjpucDtvezgAhVHaCsKHakmDlQQ_AUoA3oECAwQAw&biw=320&bih=441&dpr=2.25

If you search Janapriyanayakan you will get his images in Google and many media links Anoop Balakumar (talk) 02:38, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The images don't help. What we need is a news article that explains what the title is and who awarded it. —C.Fred (talk) 02:49, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Dileep

The title was awarded by several medias, His movies title card shows the title. Who awarded Chiranjeevi Megastar title... Not government The media only Why always hate for Our Janapriya nayakan Anoop Balakumar (talk) 15:30, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We're consistent, then: "Megastar" is not mentioned at all in the body of Chiranjeevi. —C.Fred (talk) 18:06, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Daniel (film) (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hellknowz was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

More sources are needed. Possibly WP:TOOSOON.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jack Daniel (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jack Daniel (film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:55, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anoop Balakumar! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:55, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Shah Rukh Khan. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Begoon 11:47, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can give sites that proves all

I add sites also why you edit. You are paid. I wrote truth. Indians know the truth. Anoop Balakumar (talk) 11:50, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's difficult to understand what point you are trying to make, but let me be clear:

All edits require a reliable source - see WP:Referencing for beginners
The rules on referencing for WP:BLP are strict, and strictly enforced.
Read the blue links above.
If you continue to add unsourced or improperly sourced material to articles, particularly BLP articles, you are likely to be blocked from editing.

Thank you. -- Begoon 11:59, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok

srgay Anoop Balakumar (talk) 02:37, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at China Town (2011 film). If Dileep has adopted a new stage name, you must provide multiple sources showing the change. —C.Fred (talk) 02:55, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source

Which Source u accept Anoop Balakumar (talk) 05:11, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you're referring to the revert above, one thing would be the official credits of the movie. You would also need to show that multiple newspaper stories and the like have starting using his new name. See reliable sources for more details about determining if a source is reliable. —C.Fred (talk) 14:43, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Title

It's not his name it is his Title Anoop Balakumar (talk) 15:42, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Titles are typically omitted throughout an article. Further, you would need to show what authority bestowed the title on him. —C.Fred (talk) 15:51, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Media

Search google Janapriya nayakan Anoop Balakumar (talk) 16:00, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, a Google search is not a substitute for a reliable source. Telling someone else to use Google to search is even less so. Please take a moment to read the information that people have linked above, about what kind of source is useful. --bonadea contributions talk 16:08, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jack Daniel (film) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jack Daniel (film), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jack Daniel (film)

Hello, Anoop Balakumar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jack Daniel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:43, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:UNSOURCED, WP:POV, WP:CIR

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:23, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Multistarrer

Multistarrer Anoop Balakumar (talk) 09:28, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Haseena Ibrahim Parkar.webp

A tag has been placed on File:Haseena Ibrahim Parkar.webp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://starsunfolded.com/dawood-ibrahim/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:15, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Anoop Balakumar (talk) 12:19, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate maintenance tags

Can you explain why you added tags requesting more citations and cleaning up bare URLs to the Manju Warrier article? The article is full of citations, and none use bare URLs. -- Whpq (talk) 13:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full of useless ciatations Anoop Balakumar (talk) 17:02, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What citations are useless? If the citation does not confirm the information it is supposed to be a reference for, it can be tagged with ^{[failed verification]}. Tagging an article for more sources in this instance is misleading and actively unhelpful. An editor who comes by to fix the issue you identified will see an article that already is full of references. The tag is h=just plain wrong for this situation. And the bare url tagging still makes no sense. -- Whpq (talk) 17:16, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

She dont need wiki Anoop Balakumar (talk) 17:58, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your response does not make any sense. What specific issue do you have with the article that caused you to add the tags, and what action on the article do you expect to be taken to resolve the issue? -- Whpq (talk) 01:33, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Haseena Ibrahim Parkar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Haseena Ibrahim Parkar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BEACHIDICAE🌊 14:16, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Her biopic is there

Anoop Balakumar (talk) 17:03, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Haseena Ibrahim Parkar

Hello, Anoop Balakumar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Haseena Ibrahim Parkar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]