User talk:Anilmuthineni

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Anilmuthineni, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Article 74 (Constitution of India). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —SpacemanSpiff 01:49, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. Of course I will stay. Although I am new to editing, I have been using Wikipedia since a long time and now I cannot imagine life without Wikipedia :). Anilmuthineni (talk) 13:38, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article 74(Constitution of India)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Article 74(Constitution of India), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.constitution.org/cons/india/p05074.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:45, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Article 74(Constitution of India)

The article Article 74(Constitution of India) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The rest of the Indian Constitution seems to be split up be "parts", and no other pages exist solely on one "article". Hence, no precedent for inclusion.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -Zeus-^u|c 03:47, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Article 74(Constitution of India)

I have nominated Article 74(Constitution of India), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Article 74(Constitution of India). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -Zeus-^u|c 03:51, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bommai V. union of india

Good work on the S. R. Bommai v. Union of India. I have some concerns/inputs:

1) Before creating an article run a search if it exists already. In this case a older article SR Bommai v Union of India did exist. I have now added info from the older article to this one and redirected the older article to point here. Checking first would avoid duplication.
2) Citations - currently the article is unreferenced. Per wikipedia policy anyone can remove unreferenced information from an article anytime. So someone might stub (shorten it to one or two lines) the article. So try and add references.
3) Language - The critical analysis section, reads like an essay. Read a few older articles to get a feel of how "encyclopedic language" works and reword it. (it is difficult to write dry articles :-)).--Sodabottle (talk) 07:37, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have searched Wikipedia before creating new article. I don't know how I missed the older article. I remember, I even tried different search strings. Anyhow that was my mistake. I will be more careful next time. I changed the critical analysis section as you said. I will see if I can add some citations. Anilmuthineni (talk) 12:26, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I too get the same problem sometimes and have created duplicate articles. I guess internal wikipedia search is not that efficient. So these days i do an external google search also to confirm. But in this the reason you missed it might be because the title you have used is the correct one according to naming conventions (the dots between initials and a dot after v). The existing one was not following naming conventions. Nice article BTW, this was in my long term to do list. --Sodabottle (talk) 13:05, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added some citations. I will add some more. By the way, how to remove that "No Citations" warning on the top of the article?. I think we need separate Wikipedia article on "Centre-state relations in India" to which we can add all the articles of constitution, laws, court cases, controversies that deal with Centre-state relations in India. What is your opinion on this? Is there any forum on Wikipedia to discuss like these things? Anilmuthineni (talk) 13:39, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article 74 AFD

At AFD, the convention is for each person to !vote keep/delete/merge etc only once. It is perfectly okay to add subsequent comments besides later on, but these are usually prefixed by Comment' instead of Keep or Delete. Can you update your latest comment at the AFD accordingly to avoid confusion ? Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 14:26, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Anilmuthineni (talk) 14:31, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kuno River

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kuno River, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.india9.com/i9show/Kuno-River-66073.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 18:35, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alnia River

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Alnia River, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://waterresources.rajasthan.gov.in/3rivers3.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 18:39, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Sohadara River

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Sohadara River, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.india9.com/i9show/Sohadara-River-34675.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Sohadara River and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Sohadara River, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Sohadara River with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Sohadara River. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Sohadara River saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! • Gene93k (talk) 03:25, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. When you recently edited Har Ki Doon valley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alpine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dheel River

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Dheel River, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- 𝒥𝒶𝒹𝑒 ^(Talk) • 𝓉𝒽𝑒𝓎/𝓉𝒽𝑒𝓂] 22:09, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]