User talk:Angusta

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Thanks for creating Messy Church.

User:Doomsdayer520 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for this new article. Note that other editors have raised some issues about the quality of the references. In short, the article needs verification from more reliable sources. If this matter is not addressed, future editors may call for the article to be deleted.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:58, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Doomsdayer520: Thank you for your review. I have added references to secondary sources and I believe that, with those, the issues raised have been adequately addressed. Angusta (talk) 18:57, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Angusta

Thank you for creating HMS Gazelle (J342).

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:12, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

Hi there, Angusta. I'm happy to see you have recently written two biographies of women. If you intend to continue along these lines, you might like to become a member of WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women. In any case, we look forward to more women's biographies. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:24, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Angusta. Thank you for your work on Wendy Mitchell. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:00, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Angusta. Thank you for your work on Rachel Eubanks. User:The Night Watch, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|The Night Watch}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

The Night Watch (talk) 13:37, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Saumarez Island moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Saumarez Island. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 19:54, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saumarez Island has been accepted

Saumarez Island, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 20:39, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Angusta. Thank you for your work on King's Stag. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

this needs to be a disambiguation page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 15:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Angusta. Thank you for your work on Judith Heneghan. Another editor, Bastun, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work on your new article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]