User talk:Andracula Insta

Welcome!

Hi Andracula Insta! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! — FenrisAureus ▼ (she/they) (talk) 16:51, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, FenrisAureus .Thanks for your hand for helping me. I am truly glad to be here and am now writing an article on an infamous genious, Dr.Asim Mukhopadhyay, as you might have noticed. I am new in Wikipedia as an editor, so will expect some help from you as I am inexperienced.

With Regards. Andracula Insta (talk) 17:09, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Asim Mukhopadhyay has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Asim Mukhopadhyay. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:00, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hi Andracula Insta! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Draft:Dr. Asim Mukhopadhyay several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Draft talk:Dr. Asim Mukhopadhyay, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:03, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Asim Mukhopadhyay (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This page appears to have been written to praise its subject rather than to describe the subject neutrally. Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view.

If this draft is resubmitted without being reworked, it may be nominated for deletion. You may ask for advice about the tone of articles at the Teahouse.

The title of this draft either has been disambiguated or will require disambiguation if accepted. If this draft is accepted, a hatnote will need to be added to the primary page to refer to this page. If there is already a hatnote on the primary page, please review whether a disambiguation page is in order instead.

The primary page is Asim Mukhopadhyay.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr. Asim Mukhopadhyay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:04, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andracula Insta! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:04, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dr. Asim Mukhopadhyay has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dr. Asim Mukhopadhyay. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asim Mukhopadhyay (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Asim Mukhopadhyay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:29, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Asim Mukhopadhyay (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Twinkle1990 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Per previous decline. Submitted without improving.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr. Asim Mukhopadhyay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Twinkle1990 (talk) 11:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dr. Asim Mukhopadhyay has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dr. Asim Mukhopadhyay. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:12, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your advice. I owe you a lot if this article is accepted. Andracula Insta (talk) 13:23, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Asim Mukhopadhyay (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

the first four sections are entirely unsourced?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr. Asim Mukhopadhyay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:38, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Doubt

Please be frank with me and say that why is my article being declined several times. I have corrected all the errors and resubmitted but there is no response for over a month. The person about whom I am writing is a frankly able person suited for Wikipedia, just because he did all his works before Google was even born does not mean that he is not an able person. Please reply. Andracula Insta (talk) 04:43, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asim Mukhopadhyay (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

way too much unsourced content.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Asim Mukhopadhyay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:02, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Asim Mukhopadhyay has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Asim Mukhopadhyay. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 06:27, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Asim Mukhopadhyay (writer) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Asim Mukhopadhyay (writer). Thanks! asilvering (talk) 03:43, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asim Mukhopadhyay (writer) (October 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources are still VERY poor.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Asim Mukhopadhyay (writer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:10, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Asim Mukhopadhyay (writer)

Hello, Andracula Insta. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Asim Mukhopadhyay (writer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]