User talk:AnantGyaan

August 2019

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "publish changes" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 14:59, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, AnantGyaan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — soupvector (talk) 17:31, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Damascus steel, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Your edits summarized here appear to alter other users' edits - I will revert these for now. — soupvector (talk) 17:33, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Persecution of Muslims, you may be blocked from editing. and other articles. Doug Weller talk 17:24, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Vanamonde (Talk) 19:22, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Vanamonde (Talk) 19:24, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AnantGyaan, as far as I'm concerned, the only reason you are not sanctioned right now is because the discretionary sanctions alert given to you above came after your most recent edit. El_C 19:31, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

To enforce an arbitration decision you have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

El_C 19:43, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban

The following topic ban now applies to you:

You have been topic banned from Indian subjects, broadly construed.

This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period to enforce the ban.

If you wish to appeal the ban, please read the appeals process. Doug Weller talk 13:59, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: It looks like AnantGyaan violated the topic ban ~~again~~ in Special:Diff/968295336. — Newslinger talk 15:44, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: @Newslinger: Has the ban been revoked? If not the user has again violated it on 2020 Hathras gang rape and murder. See this edit. Wikiuser13 (talk | contribs) 18:45, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

To enforce an arbitration decision you have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.

Doug Weller talk 15:55, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

There was no reason to block me except that this page is run by Right-wing bogots who have the habit of surpressing Freedom of Speech of everyone and anyone who tells the inconvenient truth, specially those who are Indians (even of it means blocking Indians from editing India - related pages). AnantGyaan (talk) 15:13, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to 2020 Hathras gang rape and murder, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You removed some content from the page claiming "unverified content". But, citations were there. Even if you believe something is unverified, it better to use Citation Needed or Verification Failed tag. For now, I have reverted your edit. If you disagree please, feel free to discuss on the article's talk page. Wikiuser13 (talk | contribs) 15:53, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1.The citations were there for another sentence in the article but another sentence under Sub-heading "Cremation" is labelled as "failed verification" reproduced below: "The brother and the father of the victim alleged that it was done without family's consent and that they were locked up[failed verification]"

2. The articles in The Wire and Scroll.in were denied by both Concept PR and thr Government. The PR agency works with the bollywood and since recently some bollywood actors were vocal against Indian Government on some political issues, hence they are under target of some politicians and even media houses as well

AnantGyaan (talk) 16:29, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First issue has been resolved by me in this edit. As for the second issue, instead of deleting well source content, consider adding what you think is missing from the article. Cheers! Wikiuser13 (talk | contribs) 17:30, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To enforce an arbitration decision you have been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.

Doug Weller talk 18:26, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."