User talk:Amousey

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
163		Social stigma of obesity (talk)	Add sources
16		Clinical descriptions of chronic fatigue syndrome (talk)	Add sources
63		Show cave (talk)	Add sources
112		Leader of the Opposition (Australia) (talk)	Add sources
54		Chronic fatigue syndrome treatment (talk)	Add sources
1,375		Madonna–whore complex (talk)	Add sources
710		Myalgia (talk)	Cleanup
249		Anti-Korean sentiment (talk)	Cleanup
387		Yellow ribbon (talk)	Cleanup
124		Anti-Vietnamese sentiment (talk)	Expand
238		Anti-Western sentiment (talk)	Expand
1,022		Disability (talk)	Expand
432		Abnormal psychology (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
2,150		Mental disorder (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
27		Anti-Khmer sentiment (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
286		Spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leak (talk)	Merge
214		Organic brain syndrome (talk)	Merge
248		Anti-Masonry (talk)	Merge
656		Smart card (talk)	Wikify
24		Disability in China (talk)	Wikify
501		Anti-Hindu sentiment (talk)	Wikify
8		Jamie Beddard (talk)	Orphan
3		Disability publications in the U.S. (talk)	Orphan
9		Memory and decision-making (talk)	Orphan
42		Clannism (talk)	Stub
56		Post-exertional malaise (talk)	Stub
45		Anti-Igbo sentiment (talk)	Stub
432		Lethargy (talk)	Stub
45		Anti-Austrian sentiment (talk)	Stub
9		ME Association (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:40, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Hi, I am not an admin, but I closed your recent MfD because it was the wrong venue. Articles go through WP:AFD and redirects go through WP:RFD. Please take time to read our deletion policy more closely. Thanks. Aasim 13:10, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks A Amousey (talk) 13:17, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Pronouns

Since I've been seeing you at the reference desks, I have to ask: In your signature, shouldn't it be "they, them pronouns" rather than "they, then pronouns"? Deor (talk) 14:05, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

How did I not notice that! Thank you! Amousey (they/then pronouns) (talk) 20:20, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Martha Mitchell effect munge

Not sure what you did, but could you fix the messed up style at Martha Mitchell effect resulting from this edit? Search on page for 'innocent colleague' to find the spot. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 06:59, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying me and sorry for the error. I used the wrong template to mark up a questionable source. Have now fixed it. Amousey (they/them pronouns) (talk) 18:18, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Templates

Template:Prove it is a redirect to Template:Citation needed. I think you wanted {{Request quotation}} at Multiple chemical sensitivity. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:15, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

thanks Amousey (they/them pronouns) (talk) 22:04, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This covers the article on multiple chemical sensitivity, it also covers the topic of "chronic Lyme disease" and any other fake disease, plus "recovered memory". Guy (help!) 08:02, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Guy I don't follow what this means or which pages are included - is this only for pages that are in the Fringe or Pseudoscience categories? Or might this involve any mention an administrator deems to be "fringe" on any page? I have an interest in Alternative Views rather than the bizarre evidence-less ridiculous topics in Fringe.

I do not understand what this "recovered memory" thing refers to because it's vague. One of the mainstream PTSD criteria is inability to recall parts of a trauma - which is well known in combat - would that be under "recovered memory"? Could any recognized diagnosis with either amnesia or memory issues be interpreted as "recovered memory"? Like TBI.

What are these sanctions and conditions?

I notice that you previously misinterpreted several comments I have made including you removing a comment about "pushing my view" on CFS when I posted about a different topic entirely, and replying in a way on the MCS page that seemed to suggest that you thought I disagreed with the content of the page. Not so! I was simply pointing out it was better not to use certain terms to respond to those with entirely different views. No need for that when the science is clear and that's all we are following. Amousey (they/them pronouns) (talk) 10:33, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lyme Disease Awareness Month (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tom (LT) were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lyme Disease Awareness Month and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lyme Disease Awareness Month, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tom (LT) (talk) 13:20, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Amousey! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tom (LT) (talk) 13:20, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

I was looking at WPMED-related pages, and I don't think that LDAM should be handled as a separate subject. Would you consider adding that information to Lyme disease#Society and culture and redirecting the title there? (This page isn't on my watchlist, so ping me if you need me.) WhatamIdoing (talk) 15:33, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your suggestion User:WhatamIdoing. There shouldn't be an issue with notability since I resubmitted it since the CDC has been running a Lyme Disease Awareness Month campaign for a number of years now, focusing on prevention and early diagnosis but mostly prevention - it seems prevalence is increasing and affecting more areas. It does appear to have had significant notable sources deleted since I submitted it. It's also on the List of month long observances, most of which have their own pages eg Breast Cancer Awareness Month, with the health ones in the WP:MED project - although perhaps that is for those with prevention / health initiatives only. There's also already categories for the pages for many other May observances, US observances, environmental ones, etc. I haven't edited the Lyme Disease page since I don't know the topic. - Amousey (they/them pronouns) (talk) 02:27, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

It'd be normal for an ongoing notable social event to be mentioned in the article, and the fact that it's not might encourage reviewers to believe that it must not be notable.

I've never been convinced that Breast Cancer Awareness Month should have its own article. I just stripped some information out of it about events that didn't happen during that month. That section was almost all outdated primary sources (think: Komen has a fundraiser, sourced to Komen's fundraising website). It should probably be merged to Breast cancer awareness instead of being kept as a separate article. WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:20, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Hello, I'm ජපස. Your recent edit(s) to the page Clinical trials on Ayurvedic drugs appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Inserting fringe claims like this can be grounds for sanction. You have been warned. jps (talk) 14:36, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

talk - I have noted your false accusation of POV pushing and false accusation of adding incorrect information - and your removal of the message above from my talked page is something I decided to revert. I have commented on the article's talk page. I suggest you consider whether your baseless bad faith accusation - which you repeated on the talk page - is conducive to the editing environment on WP and why you repeated it after realizing that my edit was entirely accurate. Amousey (they/them pronouns) (talk) 22:44, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

I have become convinced that my first instinct here was correct. I just undid a number of edits you made on Satanic ritual abuse that represent a naked WP:POVPUSH. I suggest you take a break from editing WP:FRINGE articles. If you do not, we can report your actions to WP:AE and ask for sanction. jps (talk) 20:21, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

In sociology a moral panic is not the same as a hoax, and two reverts of a categorization set by another is not a "POV push" since it's returning the page to its previous consensus. When edits are well supported then attempts to report usually lead to a WP:BOOMERANG. Amousey (they/them pronouns) (talk) 00:22, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Pizzagate is relevant. [1] jps (talk) 01:00, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saath Charitable Trust (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saath Charitable Trust and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Saath Charitable Trust, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 20:03, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zero Waste Week has been accepted

Zero Waste Week, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nightenbelle (talk) 21:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you - Amousey (they/them pronouns) (talk) 21:37, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lyme Disease Awareness Month has been accepted

Lyme Disease Awareness Month, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 19:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Saath Charitable Trust

Hello, Amousey. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saath Charitable Trust".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Morbid gain

Hello, please see this entry of mine on a different user's page. I later realized it is unlikely that this person is unlikely to respond, so I looked again for somebody more likely to help, and found your profile (Amousey) -- could you please check out this entry -- it's an interesting topic: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Drdaviss#Article_on_%22morbid_gain%22 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.189.110.31 (talk) 14:10, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Idiopathic chronic fatigue for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Idiopathic chronic fatigue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Idiopathic chronic fatigue until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Guy (help! - typo?) 09:59, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

I think you reverted the wrong version

Hello Amousey. I see that in this edit, you said you were removing a reference to a study, but instead, you reverted me changing a link to Magnesium to Magnesium (medical use). I'm indifferent about whether this study stays or goes, but please check the page to make sure you edit was what you intended. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 02:58, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

My apologies and thank you for spotting it. - Amousey (they/them pronouns) (talk) 15:56, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neurasthenia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stress. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:07, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Change of name of Fatigue page

Hi, I just wondered if you could support this again?

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Fatigue#Change_article_title_to_%22Fatigue_(medical)%22?

- all best wishes Asto77 (talk) 12:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:Brain cancers has been nominated for merging

Category:Brain cancers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 20:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)