User talk:Ammar Anwer

Proposed deletion of Shahzad Shams

Hello, Ammar Anwer. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Shahzad Shams, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

ToThAc (talk) 18:41, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shahzad Shams

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shahzad Shams, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:09, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Shahzad Shams, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 19:27, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Shahzad Shams, you may be blocked from editing. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:28, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ammar Anwer, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ammar Anwer! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

September 2020

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lahore General Hospital, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Idell (talk) 06:22, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Ammar Anwer. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Shaikh Zayed Medical College and Hospital, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Idell (talk) 07:00, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello Ammar Anwer. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Waqar Zaka, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ammar Anwer. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ammar Anwer|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Saqib (talk) 07:36, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Saqib

Thank you for your message. I am neither receiving or expect to receive any compensation for the edits made to Waqar Zaka. I know about paid advocacy and am aware about conflict of interest (COI). I would have made the mandatory disclosures on my user page if this were the case. These edits were made after through research. However I concede to your point that I should have made these changes in the talk page. I had some free time on hand and decided to improve Wikipedia. I have gone through a lot of pages and all of them are on my list. Majority of them are from Wikipedia:Pakistan and need corrections and updates. Instead of directly editing them, I will be leaving proposed edits on their talk pages. These edits were made only to improve my editing stats on Wikipedia. I will however request you to reconsider the edits and if they are independently verifiable, they may please be reinstated. Ammar Anwer (talk) 08:23, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to WZ blp were written in a PR tone and were promotional in nature in clear violation of WP:NPOV. --Saqib (talk) 14:52, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edits were based on a through research and aredindependently verifiable. Various sources were searched to verify. All the materials mentioned in edits was from print media, citing local and international sources. However the reverted revisions can be restructured to reduce the editorial bias. Ammar Anwer (talk) 18:15, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you in touch with Waqar Zaka? --Saqib (talk) 16:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I had uploaded some pictures of Waqar Zaka on wikimedia commons. For copyright purpose, I had requested him to send an email from his domain and cc to my address. That's the extent of it. Ammar Anwer (talk)14:19, 16 October 2020