User talk:Amil2012
Welcome
[edit]
|
Cameroonians in the UK moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Cameroonians in the UK. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Wikishovel (talk) 09:40, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Amil2012. Thank you for your work on Cameroonian French. User:EytanMelech, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
This article is in serious need of citations, as there is a clear lack of any linked source for any of the claims in the article, and due to the fact that all general references are books, it is unclear where each fact came from.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|EytanMelech}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
EytanMelech (talk) 16:34, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Cameroonians in the UK
[edit]
Hello, Amil2012. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cameroonians in the UK, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:06, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
[edit]
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to 2024 United Kingdom riots. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. CNC (talk) 12:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at 2024 United Kingdom riots shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CNC (talk) 18:28, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Another edit like the one you made to 2024 United Kingdom riots and I'll block you
[edit]What you did was not just change the dates, but delete sources and add ". Also, the rioters suffered from unjust arrests due to two-tier policing" and made it appear that it was sourced. Doug Weller talk 13:33, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Doug Weller Probably you should check these edits: [1][2]. CNC (talk) 18:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 19:02, 26 August 2024 (UTC){{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 19:24, 26 August 2024 (UTC)unblock me pls
[edit]
Amil2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This article has blatant misinformation on the first section and I try to fix that even though some editors still revert the changes because of their bias. The date is wrong but yet I'm blocked. I tell an editor to tell me why he/she left the blatant misinformation and I told him to reply because if he didn't in any time, I would've felt the need to edit in a different account. I know it sounded like a threat but I just don't like people being misinformed and getting wrong information by biased editors. Amil2012 (talk) 19:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Looks like we need to leave the block in place to prevent further problems. Good block. Yamla (talk) 20:24, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- For your awareness, on Wikipedia the rules are a single user per a single account. There are exceptions but it is best that new editors avoid that to start. You aren't expected to know all the rules and that is why you should always adhere to what we call wiki-etiquette (It is linked in your welcome message). Do not respond to my message. Instead I suggest while you are blocked from editing that you begin reading the rules (linked in the welcome message) closely and make sure that you can adhere to them and then put together a proper unblock request. All of the information is there for you to absorb to do so should you choose to remain an editor on the encyclopedia. Good luck! --ARoseWolf 12:18, 27 August 2024 (UTC)