User talk:Ameteurdemographer

Ameteurdemographer, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ameteurdemographer! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:22, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Serena Williams

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Agtx (talk) 23:38, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, I'm Kante4. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Cristiano Ronaldo because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kante4 (talk) 15:21, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

how is it not constructive? that's his real height. Ameteurdemographer (talk) 15:24, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And your source is? You realize there a source next to it from the OFFICIAL real madrid site which has it correct and we follow that... Kante4 (talk) 15:33, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

it isn't correct. but i guess it's official enough. they changed it because it would complicate the american system (feet and inches)Ameteurdemographer (talk) 15:38, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know it's not correct? RM has it correct in my mind. Kante4 (talk) 15:41, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

their old sources said he was 1.86. also saw multiple times in live champions league or la liga profiles as 1,86. he became 1.85 after they introduced the american system, which usually shaves off or adds a few cms to round up numbers. his weight is also incorrect. some put him at 78 kgs, like the world championships, other at around 83 kgs. his weight was also simplified. Ameteurdemographer (talk) 15:47, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm You don't "become" 1.85. Why should they care about the US system when he/they are european? Anyways, 1.85 is correct. Kante4 (talk) 15:49, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

dunno. maybe for simplicity sake. anyway, he did become 1,85. even on wikipedia his older profile put him at 1,86. Ameteurdemographer (talk) 15:52, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Other Sport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Women's football. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to European New Zealanders

Hi,

Can you explain your edit to European New Zealanders where you replaced Lorde with David Wenham in a list of New Zealanders. It doesn't appear to be correct to me but you have reinstated the edit after I reverted it. Thanks 101.98.248.252 (talk) 00:14, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at European New Zealanders. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- haminoon (talk) 02:00, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

how was my edit "disruptive"?Ameteurdemographer (talk) 20:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Because you are edit warring over it. You need to explain on the article talk page why you want to replace Lorde with someone who appears to not be a Pakeha. -- haminoon (talk) 21:26, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

sorry but that's BS. i added crowe becasue they are higher profile euro newzealanders, than lord. some lord fangirl/boy reverted it and accused me of vanadalism ON THE 1ST TRY. Ameteurdemographer (talk) 04:26, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We are talking about this edit where you replaced Lorde with David Wenham. Perhaps I am wrong but I don't think David Wenham is a New Zealander. Can you please explain your rationale. Thanks. 101.98.248.252 (talk) 06:02, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, I see you have changed it to Russell Crowe now. I don't think he is such a great example to include here. He is indeed a New Zealand citizen but he has maintained very close association with Australia for most of his life and has publicly stated his desire to become an Australian citizen. 101.98.248.252 (talk) 06:31, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ameteurdemographer: Wikipedia saves the history of each edit so its not a good idea to misrepresent yours or other peoples edits. We all know that neither Wenham nor Crowe identify as NZer or Pakeha so how about you leave out the fangirl/boy insults. I noticed you still haven't brought it up on the article talk page. -- haminoon (talk) 07:14, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:22, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]