User talk:Amanatadverse17

Welcome!

Hi Amanatadverse17! I noticed your contributions to List of Delhi Public School Society schools and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Marquardtika (talk) 15:49, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Delhi Public School, Dooars (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not pass WP:NSCHOOL

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Delhi Public School, Dooars and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 19:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amanatadverse17! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 19:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Delhi Public School, Dooars (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Delhi Public School, Dooars and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:07, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Delhi Public School, Dooars (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Delhi Public School, Dooars and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delhi Public School, Dooars moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Delhi Public School, Dooars. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 15:35, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

can you please tell me atleast how many citation we need to provide and specifically on which topics.. Amanatadverse17 (talk) 05:56, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Amanatadverse17, to start off, you have linked the YouTube channel of that school. Do you work there or in any way related with the school?

Source Analysis:

YouTube channels are not reliable sources and do not contribute towards notability.
The sources Jagran and Ayudh appear to be more like press releases and blog posts.
The article from The Statesman may be reliable AFAIK.
Listing websites such as saras.cbse.gov.in, dpsdooars.com, cbse.gov.in, dpsfamily.org and ncert.nic.in do not contribute towards notability.

You would require in-depth coverage in reliable and published third-party sources. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:15, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understood what you are trying to say but may I please know atleast how many citations do we need to provide as I have also seen many school's wikipedia pages with only 3 to 4 citations. Thank you for your valuable Time. Amanatadverse17 (talk) 06:40, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you must have missed my initial question. Do you work there or have any connection with the school? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:46, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for it. I am a Student there in that School. Amanatadverse17 (talk) 06:52, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Delhi Public School, Dooars (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:NSCHOOL

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Delhi Public School, Dooars and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 20:24, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

could you please elaborate a bit what you wanna say? And also atleast how many citations we need to provide. Amanatadverse17 (talk) 20:29, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Amanatadverse17 we'd usually need a minimum of three independent sources. Qcne (talk) 16:15, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Delhi Public School, Dooars (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Zero evidence of notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Delhi Public School, Dooars and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:14, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mr Grazing I have provided 3 - 4 notable websites (as told to me by another editor QCNE) talking about the school, excluding the school's own website. So what's the problem also if there's some problem please explain it to me in detail also please let me know how to fullfil the notability criteria by giving some example. Amanatadverse17 (talk) 20:27, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft cites the following sources:

The school's own website
Ditto
Can't check this at the moment as it returns 502 error, but from memory it doesn't provide significant coverage of the subject
Primary source (government website)
Primary, non-reliable and non-independent source
Ditto

None of these counts towards notability per WP:ORG. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:39, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ajay Kumar Jha (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by 331dot were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The language about him being "martyred", "dedicated", "tragedy", etc. is not a neutral point of view, no matter how sad an event this is, and needs to be removed. Also see WP:1E; it may be that the event that resulted in his death may merit an article, but not him personally.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ajay Kumar Jha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 14:33, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Delhi Public School, Dooars (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

Resubmitted without any meaningful improvement, previous decline still stands. If the sources aren't significantly improved before resubmission, this draft is likely to be rejected outright.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Delhi Public School, Dooars and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:29, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Delhi Public School, Dooars

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Delhi Public School, Dooars, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 12:38, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Manish Kashyap moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Manish Kashyap, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bbb23 (talk) 12:41, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ajay Kumar Jha moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ajay Kumar Jha, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bbb23 (talk) 12:42, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Delhi Public School, Dooars (August 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Aviram7 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

--- ᗩvírαm7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 12:58, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manish Kashyap (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Deb were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manish Kashyap and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Deb (talk) 14:22, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ajay Kumar Jha (August 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Deb was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Please read the guidelines on notability. Deb (talk) 16:11, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deb (talk) 16:11, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manish Kashyap (August 13)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Deb was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No significant improvements have been made since the last review failed.

Deb (talk) 07:51, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Manish Kashyap

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Manish Kashyap, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --- ᗩvírαm7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 08:46, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Khan Sir, you may be blocked from editing. The unsourced material you added is also blatantly promotional. Bbb23 (talk) 12:31, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashish Chanchlani (youtuber) (August 28)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The only new thing since previous AfDs, AfC submissions, recreations, and saltings (see User:Bonadea/Long term disruption#Ashish Chanchlani for a list of 13 previous titles in article and draftspace) is a trivial mention in a short press release about another Youtuber.

bonadea contributions talk 15:44, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 16:38, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]