This is an archive of past discussions with User:Amalas. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
I had made that move, but just to confuse matters, the original template had been turned into a redirect, which is what I'd moved, just to confuse matters. I've reversed that now, and deleted the category. Alai21:12, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Revert
If you didn't want to be reverted you should have deleted the stub first. As you hadn't done that it was reasonable to assume that your edit shoudl have been reverted, SqueakBox21:17, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Please see my response on my talk. I am adding the below temp as I should have done before but was unaware you are the closing admin, so a courtesy call as I see you now know about the DRV, SqueakBox22:51, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot09:09, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Re:NZ geo-stubs
Hi Amalas - you're exact;ly right as far as my suggestions are concerned:
Keep Nelson and Tasman templates as is, both feeding into a Nelson and Tasman cat
Keep Gisborne template and feed into Gisborne and Bay of Plenty cat
Feed Bay of Plenty template into Gisborne and Bay of Plenty cat
Sorry for the tardiness in sending the Signpost this week. --Ral315
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot13:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot05:14, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot08:57, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi Amalas - you wrote: I just noticed a bunch of SFD discussions about not orphaning/deleting the redirects when there is a rename. ... So, I'm sorry I haven't been as thorough with my deletions, and I will make sure to clean up the mess better in the future.
Hey, no problem, and I'm sorry if I was annoyed at the time (it was simply a case of an unwanted discovery coming when i was feeling frazzled, more than anything else). I totally understand about the real world encroaching on time on WP , and I didn't realise you did such a large proportion of the SFD closing 9for which I thank you) - perhaps more of us need to get involved in it in future. Grutness...wha?23:58, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Rhythmyx
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rhythmyx, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Rhythmyx. slakr\ talk /04:03, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
