User talk:Alvin mogus

Welcome!

Hello, Triangle Alliance, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Sahaib (talk) 10:17, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Triangle Alliance", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it appears that your account is shared. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 06:06, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Alvin mogus! Your additions to Alan Walker have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:47, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please avoid non-standard phrases like "mixed-to-negative", which you inserted at Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. The Wikipedia Film Project prefers to avoid jargon like that. Also, when you try a change to an article and it gets undone, consider going to the article's talk page to discuss instead of reinstating your change a 2nd or 3rd time. We have a strict policy against this type of behavior, which you can read about at WP:EW. The best course of action when others disagree with your edits is to discuss with them. See Wikipedia's article on dispute resolution for common practices and suggestions on how to best resolve disputes. If you need help at any time, visit The Teahouse which is a great place for newer Wikipedians like yourself to ask questions. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 12:14, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Hello, I'm SirDot. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Venom (Sony's Spider-Man Universe), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — SirDot (talk) 05:02, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 04:25, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Child's Play (2019 film), you may be blocked from editing. GoneIn60 (talk) 06:06, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Top Gun: Maverick. GoneIn60 (talk) 12:58, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Spider-Man 3, you may be blocked from editing. DonIago (talk) 16:37, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please assume good faith and do not use offensive language towards other editors like you did [1], please see Retard_(pejorative)#Modern_use. Thanks, Indagate (talk) 11:04, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SHOUT

While I appreciate a meaningful edit summary you are not doing yourself or anyone else any favors by SHOUTING IN VERY LONG EDIT SUMMARIES. If you are tempted to do this you should start a discussion on the article talk page instead. Just because you happen to be right in this case does not mean you need to SHOUT about it. -- 109.77.194.204 (talk) 16:30, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

no Alvin mogus (talk) 16:57, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Logged-out editing

Please stop making disruptive edits while logged out. This includes reinstating edits that were previously reverted when you made them using an account. If you continue to do this, you may end up blocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:44, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Top critics

I noticed you selected a review from Screenrant to add to the Black Adam article.[2] You can certainly do that if you want, but I wouldn't recommend it, Screen Rant is only marginally reliable and I would avoid them unless they have a particularly interesting or insightful opinion. I would instead strongly recommend you pick from the most reliable top mainstream critics.[3][4] It was no accident that I added a review from Empire magazine, a very mainstream source and top critic on Rotten Tomatoes. When you pick the best available source there is very little excuse for anyone to remove it later. -- 109.76.205.133 (talk) 13:02, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Black Adam (film). You've received multiple warnings for this in the past. The next disruptive edit will lead to escalation. GoneIn60 (talk) 02:57, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]