User talk:Aloofbobcat
Welcome!
[edit]Welcome to my Wikipedia Talk Page!!!
| Please leave a . |
userboxes, non-free images, and categories
[edit]Aloofbobcat, several times now you have added non-free images such as File:Minnesota Timberwolves logo.svg to userboxes, such as you did with this edit. Several times now these images have been removed from these userboxes as violating the terms of our Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria policy, specifically point #9 which forbids the use of non-free images outside of actual articles on the project. Userboxes are not articles. You can not use non-free images on userboxes. If you are uncertain if an image is non-free or not, look at the image's description page, such as here. Scroll down. If you see a big red "C" inside of a larger red circle, it is a non-free image and can not be used as you have been trying to do. If it's still unclear to you if the image is non-free or not, then contact me and I will help you identify if it is non-free or not.
_Primary_logo.svg){kind=link}
Furthermore, you've been adding article categories to userboxes, such as you did here, that are appropriate for articles but wholly inappropriate for userboxes. A userbox is not a 1989 establishment in Minnesota nor it is a NBA team. Please don't do this. If you're uncertain if a particular category is appropriate for a userbox, ask me and I will assist you.
If you have any questions about any of this, please let me know. I'll be happy to help. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:02, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for your help. Hammersoft I'll try to do better next time. Just let me know if I do anything else. I never noticed the big red "C". Aloofbobcat (talk) 19:49, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Aloofbobcat with his Daughter.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Aloofbobcat with his Daughter.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Category:Wikipedians who use Chromebook has been nominated for discussion
[edit]
Category:Wikipedians who use Chromebook, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —andrybak (talk) 15:54, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedians interested in the Minnesota United FC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:38, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
Category:Wikipedians in Twin Cities, Minnesota has been nominated for deletion
[edit]Category:Wikipedians in Twin Cities, Minnesota has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JayJayWhat did I do? 23:55, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Category:Wikipedians interested in WWE has been nominated for merging
[edit]Category:Wikipedians interested in WWE has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 18:50, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of List of current champions in Ring of Honor for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of current champions in Ring of Honor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Vjmlhds 23:18, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thea Hail (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.