User talk:Allin96

Welcome!

Hi Allin96! I noticed your contributions to Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Mattythewhite (talk) 13:14, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Laborate 1985 logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Laborate 1985 logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 10:45, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Laborate Pharma Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Laborate Pharma Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 14:32, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Laborate 1985 logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Laborate 1985 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 14:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing?

Hello Allin96. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Allin96. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Allin96|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 12:58, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Theroadislong.Thank you for the articulated response and the suggestions you've made. I would like to disclose that I have not been paid nor any compensation has been provided to me to draft this article.However, I would like to state that I have been indirectly related to someone who works for this group. He is an old college acquaintance and wanted someone to write an unbiased piece. I have volunteered to draft this on my own volition and have tried to draft the article in an informative and neutral voice. If I am supposed to abide by any other rules pertaining to this, I would be happy to. Allin96 (talk) 04:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Allin96[reply]

Hi Allin96. Based on what you've posted above, I think you would still considered to have a WP:COI by many members of the Wikipedia community per WP:COI#Writing about yourself, family, friends for trying to create an article about your friend's company. Whether your connection meets what is considered to be WP:PAID editing is unclear, but be advised that "compensated editing" doesn't necessarily only mean being directly paid money to edit or create an article; it can also include some types of non-monetary compensation (e.g. preferential treatment or services) as well as indirect types of compensation (e.g a stockholder editing an article about a company they own stock in so as to try and improve/maintain the company's value and thus increase/maintain the value of their stock).

All of the above doesn't mean you can't still work on improving the draft like you've been doing, but it probably would be best for you to continue to submit it for review to WP:AFC if the current version you have submitted is declined. Just keep doing your best to improve the draft in accordance with relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines and follow the suggestion of the AFC reviewers. If, on the other hand, the draft is accepted as an article, then you should explain WP:OWN to our friend. The article is going to be written about his company reflecting what independent reliable sources are saying about it; it's not going to be written for his company or on behalf of his company reflecting what the company wants the world to know about it. So, neither he nor anyone connected to him or the company (including even his friends) will have any sort of final editorial control over article content.

If you're friend expects to be able to "control" the article through others or expects to "use" the article for any of the things listed here, he will only end up causing lots of problems for anyone he asks to edit the article. Article content will be assessed according Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, not what he or the company wants, and any disagreements over article content (i.e. what to leave in or what to leave out) will need to be resolved through WP:CONSENSUS according to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

As for your connection, it would probably be a good idea for you as well to follow Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide#Steps for engagement （also see WP:COIADVICE) and use the article's talk page to propose or request changes be made to the article (except in some very limited cases where the change is so minor or so obviously an improvement that 10 out of 10 editors are highly unlikely to disagree with the edit) once the draft has been approved as an article. If you find you do need to edit the article for some unavoidable reason, you should leave an edit summary clearly explaining why and stating your connection to the subject; if your edit is reverted by another editor, even after some time has passed, you should follow WP:BRD and start a discussion about things on the article's talk page. If you simply revert the reverter, you're likely going to run the risk of edit warring which neither you, your friend, nor his company will be able to win. If you're not sure whether something's going to be a minor edit, then it's best to use the article talk page and let another unconnected editor assess it. Good luck with your draft. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:23, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Marchjuly, so what is the current status of my article. Do I need to make any disclosures. Has my article been sent for review, please let me know as Im new and still getting acclimatized with the terms and abbreviations. thanks youAllin96 (talk) 05:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Laborate Pharmaceuticals India Limited is still awaiting an AfC review. Sometimes it takes time for a draft to be reviewed because there tend to be more drafts submitted than there are WP:VOLUNTEERs to review them. You just need to be patient. You can, however, continue to work on the improving the draft if you like, or can try and find other ways to WP:CONTRIBUTE to improving Wikipedia. There are over six million articles and many need improving; so, if you find one that you think you can make better, feel free to be WP:BOLD and ry and do so. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:57, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Marchjuly, thanks for the information, good day.Allin96 (talk) 09:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Allin96! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Editing Reference Section, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laborate Pharmaceuticals India Limited (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Laborate Pharmaceuticals India Limited and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Laborate Pharmaceuticals India Limited, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 20:34, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Allin96! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SL93 (talk) 20:34, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Laborate Pharmaceuticals India Limited

Hello, Allin96. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Laborate Pharmaceuticals India Limited, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Laborate Pharmaceuticals India Limited

Hello, Allin96. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Laborate Pharmaceuticals India Limited".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:36, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]