Jump to content

User talk:Aliciasue.cote

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Take A Daytrip (February 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 22:41, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Aliciasue.cote! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 22:41, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Take A Daytrip has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Take A Daytrip. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:03, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Take A Daytrip (February 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 22:55, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Take A Daytrip (March 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 21:27, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Take A Daytrip (May 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- RoySmith (talk) 18:42, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page.


Information icon Hello, Aliciasue.cote. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 14:06, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Aliciasue.cote (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

Hey y'all. I completely understand why my last page has been blocked. I intern for a PR company (unpaid) and was given the duty to create a page for Take A Daytrip, who is a contemporary music production duo. I have never edited or created a wikipedia page before and truly thought that I was following the guidelines properly, but now realize I was not completely. I have hopes to get approved for a new account so I can go back and try to make an acceptable page for the duo, because they really do deserve to have notoriety on wikipedia. I personally use wikipedia nearly everyday when I look up the history of musicians I'm into or dig deeper into random facts I learn from Reddit. I'm a giant wiki fan and I hope to do y'all justice in the future. I understand that the first draft I created for Take A Daytrip was dense and hope to have the chance to do wikipedia justice for my mistakes and create a basic page for fans of the duo and music nerds to learn more on these two.

Decline reason:

No thanks. If you wish to write about subject areas for which you have no conflict of interest, feel free to request another unblock review and tell us what you'll write about instead, while convincing us you understand WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. Yamla (talk) 18:27, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]