User talk:Alice Shedrack

Slim Burna

I added the cleanup tag to the Slim Burna article because the problems need to be address. You guys need to remove the Blogspot and Wordpress references cited. They are not reliable references. You can't undo my edit without fixing the issue. If you remove the tag again without addressing the issue, I am going to report you. versace1608 (talk) 01:10, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Slim Burna, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. STATic message me! 21:08, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Static, you and versace can join the discussion already taking place at the article's talk page. Lets resolve this ok. Thank you. Alice Shedrack (talk) 22:43, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked for a period of one week as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Stanleytux (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 18:37, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alice Shedrack (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I admit to using multiple accounts, I understand that my actions broke the rules of WP:ILLEGIT but I promise it won't happen again. Thanks.Alice Shedrack (talk) 11:07 pm, Yesterday (UTC+0)

Decline reason:

Please file any unblock requests through your primary account. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:12, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing admin: this unblock request was likely precipitated by this note on my talk page as well as the fact that I have just semi-protected the main target article for 3 months to prevent further socking.--Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 23:36, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oh Na Na Na for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oh Na Na Na is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oh Na Na Na until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 16:26, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Slim Burna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Slim Burna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slim Burna (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 16:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of I'm on Fire (mixtape) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I'm on Fire (mixtape) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm on Fire (mixtape) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 16:52, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Through her eyes paradise becomes visible.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Through her eyes paradise becomes visible.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of songs recorded by Slim Burna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of songs recorded by Slim Burna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs recorded by Slim Burna until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:09, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Slim Burna - Turn Me On (2013).ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Slim Burna - Turn Me On (2013).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]