User talk:Alice.Mukesh

Concern regarding Draft:Natural forests protection in Rwanda

Hello, Alice.Mukesh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Natural forests protection in Rwanda, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Natural forests protection in Rwanda (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Natural forests protection in Rwanda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 19:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alice.Mukesh! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 19:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Greenman! Thanks for reviewing my article. I am going to use more qualified references and correct other mistakes. I hope when I resubmit, it will be ready. Alice.Mukesh (talk) 08:13, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have added one reference, perhaps you will use it. Xx236 (talk) 12:53, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rwanda mountain tea

This is advertizing, your page will be probably removed. Xx236 (talk) 12:46, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Xx236! it is not an advertising one, just a work in progress. I am going to work on it , add more references so that it can not look like an advertising one. Alice.Mukesh (talk) 13:31, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rwanda mountain tea

The article Rwanda mountain tea has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional, no indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:CORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 19:17, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rwanda Mountain Tea moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rwanda Mountain Tea, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:57, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rwanda Mountain Tea has been accepted

Rwanda Mountain Tea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:45, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Violette Uwamutara

The article Violette Uwamutara has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

lack of notability: lack of significant coverage in multiple sources independent of the subject; awards not well-known enough for WP:ANYBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. tw^sabin 12:37, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will look for more notable references to improve the article. and I would request help to make the article more legit instead of deleting it as she is a notable Person in Rwanda whom young women learn from. Thank you! Alice.Mukesh (talk) 13:22, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Africa Environment

Hello, to talk about your grant request, could you please send me an email at fdevouard anthere.org

This is actually urgent... Anthere (talk) 11:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Anthere,

I have sent the email address to you. Thank you! 197.157.162.182 (talk) 15:11, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Natural forests protection in Rwanda (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asparagusus was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Natural forests protection in Rwanda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Asparagusus (interaction) 15:42, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Turere (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robertsky were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Richard Turere instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:BLP1E applies here, and the notable invention already exists at Lion lights. No significant information that differs from what is available at the lion lights article is presented here.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard Turere and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 17:47, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Richard Turere

Hello, Alice.Mukesh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Richard Turere, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Richard Turere

Hello, Alice.Mukesh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Richard Turere".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:17, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]