User talk:Alia Tsagkari

Alia Tsagkari, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Alia Tsagkari! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Michael Grieve (photographer) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Michael Grieve (photographer). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:55, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Grieve (photographer) (March 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It's not clear from the draft that he meets WP:ARTIST or more generally WP:PERSON. If No Love Lost and Foriegner are "notable", then who has said what about them? (Currently, the article has one brief comment on the former, nothing about the latter.)

Without bothering to do more than a minimal investigation myself, I'd guess that he is notable. If I'm right, then demonstrate this.

The "Biography" section needs references. The list of exhibitions is largely unreferenced. One is described as "solo show"; should the reader infer that the others are participations in group shows? Which among these exhibitions really merit listing here? Could those that are worth listing not be formatted more compactly?

The "Selected reviews/interviews": Only minor use can be made in the article of interviews, but if reviews are substantive then they can be used in the article and then removed from this list.

I clicked on what's currently the last in the list of links: this describes a photobook in the works. Look in WorldCat to see what was actually published and link that. (The Independent article mentions Grieve's praise for Chris Killip's In Flagrante: this could be added.) --

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Grieve (photographer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Michael Grieve (photographer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 23:17, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Michael Grieve (photographer)

Hello, Alia Tsagkari. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Michael Grieve (photographer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:03, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Michael Grieve (photographer)

Hello, Alia Tsagkari. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Michael Grieve".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:55, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello, I'm 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:8D29. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Hello, Alia Tsagkari. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:8D29 (talk) 00:38, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vlassis Caniaris moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Vlassis Caniaris. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 11:53, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vlassis Caniaris has been accepted

Vlassis Caniaris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hoary (talk) 05:48, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NB In this pair of edits, I assigned examples of "Kafetsi, Anna (1999)" and "Kafetsi, Anna, ed. (1999)" to this or that part of a book that I haven't seen. I resorted to guesswork (always dangerous). I hope I didn't get anything wrong; if I did, please correct the article. -- Hoary (talk) 05:56, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Hoary,

Thank you for the information. I will work on improving the article about Vlassis Caniaris Alia Tsagkari (talk) 10:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Be careful with your user page: as it has no references I don't think it looks like an article, but other users may disagree, and call for its deletion, citing WP:User pages. A simple solution: Convert it from 3rd person to 1st person: thus not "she is" but instead "I am". If you do this, nobody will object to the result. -- Hoary (talk) 09:27, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Grieve

I'd completely forgotten Draft:Michael Grieve (photographer) until a couple of hours ago, when I read about it on this page. It had problems, but it also had promise. If you say you hope to work on it, I can "undelete" it for you. -- Hoary (talk) 09:27, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]