User talk:Alephza

Welcome!

Hello, Alephza, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Marwat did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. - Arjayay (talk) 13:04, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Marwat, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:18, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Pashtuns. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 15:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: Thanks for reminder. I shall take care of it in the future, however, I would just like to remind you that I am not the one to begin this edit war. I have added sources to backup my claim. Anyone can see those sources. If one of the sources seems unacceptable, there are three other sources that I have added. All backup my claim. It appears that the other account made it an issue without a plausible reason, and discussion on talk page. I have tried to explain my argument on the talk page [1], but instead of proper discussion, my edits were simply reverted. However, I shall remain in cool in future, will keep that in mind. Regards Alephza (talk) 15:14, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've no comment on the content issue, sorry. I'm a strong believer in edit summaries explaining the reason for the edit. Personal attacks don't help get a conducive discussion, which I suspect you know. It can be tempting at times, but staying cool is better. Doug Weller talk 15:43, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. I would be careful in the future, not to loose my mind. RegardsAlephza (talk) 16:24, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alephza (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The cause of block is that the above account is sockpuppet of another account by the username : Objective001. I would like to bring this to the attention of the committee that the above username Objective001 does not belong to me. I did not create that account nor am I using that account. I share my apartment with four other people using the same IP address, two of them have created/registered their accounts and use WP. I cannot take responsibility for their actions. However, this issue rose after I made an edit to the Talk page of Pashtuns, without signing into my account. After realizing that l left a message on the talk page without signing in, I went back to the page to sign into my account (Alephza) and re-edit the page. During that time, another account had started an edit war with me and with another account holder. This is important for you to know that the edits I made, were eventually accepted. Please check out the talk page of Pashtuns. [2] The other account ( Shivkarandholiya12 )has only used my mistake as an opportunity to get me blocked. I am fairly new to the WP and have every right to learn to edit WP. I request that my mistake be taken into account and my account be unblocked.

Decline reason:

An appeal of the Checkuser block was received by the Arbitration Committee. Maxim_(talk) 19:03, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.