Jump to content

User talk:Alan Krueger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 16:37, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Alan Krueger! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:37, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

== Relapse =="Relapse" is a (Notable) USA copyrighted 6-25-85,Two Player Board Game ,Created by Jeffery A. Krueger , and Was For Sale at Apple I-store and was removed by him ,Mr. Krueger has Been intervied by Florida Today about the "Relapse Game that has appeared in Mensa Magazine, Relapse is not for sale or promotion , Created for the World this Game is Here for Everyone ,Each Person adds new flavor to this game , Thank-you for your concern , no worries and Best wishes..

Hello. On Wikipedia we generally want lists like these to only mention games that are "notable" by Wikipedia standards, which means, there must be an article for the game. So please, successfully create an article for the game first and then you can link to it from various places.

Also, I am concerned that since these are the only edits you are making to Wikipedia that you might be using Wikipedia to promote your game. SQGibbon (talk) 23:52, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you need to successfully create an article for the game before linking to it from other articles. SQGibbon (talk) 20:52, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

== Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 21) == The Library of Congress is a reliable source "Relapse" 2-player Game Copyrighted 6-24-85,Awarded to Jeffery A. Krueger , U.S.A. Copyright Number ,598936 - txu202399 and can be verified by most anyone with even a small amount of intelligence. , Best wishes and enjoy the Article on "Relapse " the Game.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dodger67 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:37, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 09:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 09:45, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 09:54, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 11:02, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 11:30, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Alan Krueger. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. David.moreno72 11:32, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. David.moreno72 11:32, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 11:38, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps some explanation

[edit]

I see that your draft has been repeatedly declined, but without a great deal of explanation. Let me give it a shot.

In order to be included in Wikipedia, a topic (a person, place, thing, idea, or in your case, a new board game) must be notable; that is, it must have been covered significantly in media that is independent of the subject. In the case of a board game, you'd need to provide evidence that some media (a newspaper, gaming magazine, general interest magazine, larger website (one with a reputation for strong editorial control, not a website where any user can just post anything they like)) has written a significant article about your game. And generally, you'd need to provide evidence of two or more such cases. Until you can do that, your draft will not be considered for publication. Resubmitting your draft without addressing this issue is considered an abuse of the process, and could get you blocked. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:59, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Really, you have to stop doing things like this (resubmitting the draft without making any attempt to address the problems). That will get you blocked. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:16, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 12:47, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Relapse game by Jeffery A. Krueger, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Relapse game by Jeffery A. Krueger and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Relapse game by Jeffery A. Krueger during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:53, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Relapse game by Jeffery A. Krueger, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 14:23, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Deb (talk) 14:33, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]