User talk:AlabanJustatribute

April 2022[edit]

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Henry Cavill, you may be blocked from editing. – ².O.^Boxing 13:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at John Bercow. and Pinewood Studios --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:52, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:06, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AlabanJustatribute (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How is making grammatical corrections a reason for permanent block? This seems extremely unusual. Specifically in regards to the Henry Cavil page - I hadn't seen the hidden notes. I didnt even know that was such a thing. I'll look for them in the future

Decline reason:

You weren't making grammatical corrections; let's not be disingenuous. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 20:23, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nope This is not fixing grammar. This is deliberate POV editing for which you were repeatedly warned and you even deleted numerous warnings from your page w/o responding to them. Almost every edit you made has been reverted. Strongly Oppose Unblock Request -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:03, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @User:Jpgordon, User:Ad Orientem,
- "almost every edit you made has been reverted."
- An odd statement, considering all of my edits were systematically reverted by both you (Ad Orientem) and John Maynard Friedman. Targeting someone's edit history and reverting all of their edits, then implying the fact that because the edits have been reverted (by you) means they somehow weren't valid to begin with sure doesn't seem very fair to me. Neither does a permanent IP block for simple grammatical corrections. @User:Jpgordon - how is it NOT a grammatical correction? This is all very unusual. Please rereview.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AlabanJustatribute (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Is the six month timeframe from the "Standard Offer" mandatory or flexible? The block reasoning still baffles me, and I still haven't been able to find any rules that prohibit the edits I made - but regardless I still I accept that they're against the rules and will try to be more cautious in the future

Decline reason:

This isn't an unblock request. WP:SO requires six months with zero edits. That's not just zero edits under this account, that's zero edits from you yourself. At that time, you'll also need to explain why your edits were inappropriate. Yamla (talk) 21:18, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Not an admin, however...[edit]

Hey there! I was patrolling Special:RecentChanges when I noticed that you were blocked and are trying to get it appealed. In this case, I will give you the WP:SO: go six months w/out editing on the English Wikipedia, edit on another WMF project (I suggest the Simple English Wikipedia) for those six months, and then after those six months go out, make another unblock request. This time, promise to the reviewing admin that you can in fact make constructive edits to Wikipedia, and show them proof with your edits to the SE Wikipedia. Cheers! Fake scientist 8000 19:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't just my account thats blocked, I've been IP blocked as well AlabanJustatribute (talk) 19:14, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't change the WP:SO. It's still out there, and if you want to take it you may. Cheers! Fake scientist 8000 22:37, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocks on accounts almost always block the underlying IP to prevent block evasion. The block is on you as a person, not just your account. The IP block will be removed when your account is unblocked. 331dot (talk) 21:17, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AlabanJustatribute (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was told to wait 6 months and try again. I was previously blocked for failing to understand the general rules of editing; specifically making the same edit twice after another user reverted it

Decline reason:

No, "making the same edit twice after another user reverted it" is not why you were blocked. The good news is there's no evidence of block evasion, the bad news is that you don't seem to understand the problem here. Yamla (talk) 10:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.