User talk:Ajan lol

Ajan lol, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ajan lol! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Errors in the Encyclopædia Britannica that have been corrected in Wikipedia

Sorry but you shouldn't modify the page, it clearly says "The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the approriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page". I suggest WP:Deletion review. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 19:43, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of GoogleMeNowPlease (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. DMacks (talk) 20:12, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ajan lol (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked on an incorrect assumption and CheckUser was never performed. I kindly ask for CheckUser to be performed and me to be unblocked. I have absolutely nothing to do with any sockpuppets Ajan lol (talk) 22:08, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQL ^{Query me!} 22:34, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ajan lol (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I unfortunately, and carelessly added new content to a closed discussion page out of my. A moderator taught me the correct way to do it, and then I was blocked. I fully understand that I should not have done so, and if given a chance will post correctly to the deletion review as instructed. I further want to assure the admins that I am in no way connected to previous sockpuppet trolls and am a serious wikipedia editor interested in constructive edits on wikipedia Ajan lol (talk) 19:18, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Unfortunately for you we don't unblock people blocked for sockpuppetry just because they say they're not socks ... come on now, you have to agree that if we did that we might as well not have a sockpuppetry policy because it would be a joke. You might want to focus on why we might have come to believe you were a sock of a globally blocked editor, and how that belief is mistaken. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:46, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.