User talk:Ahecht/Archive 9

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ahecht. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

←

Archive 7

→

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox UK school

Template:Infobox UK school has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox school. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Steven (Editor) (talk) 22:41, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Hackity hack hack

An IP proposed a very interesting solution at WP:VPT#Way to validate Wikidata entities/QIDs in Lua?... Would you want to create such a module, perhaps using one of recommended & self-explanatory names in the phab ticket, and producing some of the desired functionality (i.e. returning "nil" instead of "invalid entity")? This would be great if it works... ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 12:57, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Hey, nice work!

Is there a way to add the 'invalid from parameter' category and show the large bold red warning to the editor if entering an invalid QID? Ideally both would happen, but if both can't, adding the cat would be better since we can track any user-errors in 1 place instead of hiding on an obscure page somewhere. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 15:05, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ted Ligety, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lake Louise and Beaver Creek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Taxonbar sandbox

Sorry, I was going to try out something in Module:Taxonbar/sandbox, but I see that you are already working on some changes to the template.

When the name of a botanical infraspecies is displayed in a taxonbar, as for example at Melaleuca fulgens subsp. steedmanii, it is not correctly formatted – connecting terms like "subsp.", "var.", "f.", should not be italicized. The function Module:TaxonItalics.italicizeTaxonName(name, linked) can be used to correctly italicize (and standardize) a taxon name, with, in this case, linked being false (the function is used by some of the {{Taxon list}} set of templates). Could you add and test this – then we won't be interfering with one another's work. Peter coxhead (talk) 19:18, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

@Peter coxhead: I'm done with my edits for now, feel free to go ahead and sandbox your changes. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:20, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. It's a simple change that I made and it appears to work fine – see the sandbox output at Template:Taxonbar/testcases#Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus) and Template:Taxonbar/testcases#Melaleuca fulgens subsp. steedmanii. However, it doesn't go far enough:

Row titles for taxon ranks higher than genus should not be italicized. This requires finding the rank from the Wikidata item and choosing whether to italicize or not.
The function I used was written for a different purpose and doesn't deal with the few cases where the taxon name is disambiguated – the parenthesized disambiguator should never be italicized.

(2) is easy to fix. I assume (1) can be fixed, but I'm not familiar with the API to Wikidata. Peter coxhead (talk) 23:13, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

@Peter coxhead: I put in a few lines that grab the rank and store it in parentArgs['rank'..f] at line 188. This is stored as the Wikidata ID for the rank (e.g. "species" is "Q7432"). If you want to recover the name of the rank, you would do mw.wikibase.label(parentARgs['rank'..f]). This probably isn't the cleanest way to store this data, but it's there as an example. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 02:30, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. I had hoped that Wikidata (being a database system) would have defined the sequence of allowed values of wikidata:Property:P105, since taxon ranks form an ordered sequence (albeit slightly differently ordered for each nomenclature code). It's done here in Module:Autotaxobox, but the input is the Latin term, not the English one, so it will be a bit tedious to decide whether the Wikidata rank is at or below the level of genus, which is where we start italicizing.

Tests suggest that the non-italicization of connecting terms works correctly, so I'll move this to the live version. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:42, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

@Peter coxhead: I put an english rank table in the sandbox module (generated by Module:Sandbox/Ahecht)). --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:45, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

It's both simpler and much more complex than that.

We only need to list the ranks from genus downwards; any rank not in this list isn't italicized.
However, it's necessary to distinguish botanical and zoological uses of the rank of section, as the automated taxobox system does by using sectio and zoosectio, because botanical sections are below genus and zoological ones above, so the italicization varies. As far as I can tell, Wikidata doesn't distinguish the rank names, so this information would have to be acquired from some other bit of data.
The virus code has quite different rules for the use of italics, which is supposed to be followed here (see Wikipedia:WikiProject Viruses/Guidelines#Italics and capitalization) although in practice it isn't always. All ranks, except the top level Groups, are italicized for viruses. So it's necessary to detect whether a genus or species is a virus or not.
Minor point, perhaps, but Wikidata doesn't seem to deal with the use of "Candidatus" in the bacteria code of nomenclature – see Candidatus Carsonella ruddii and (QCARSONELLA RUDDII).

At present I favour leaving it at the fixes I've made. Peter coxhead (talk) 15:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

R. Walker's blog

Please inform your self in Walker's history in Wikipedia and his background. He has been banned from several subjects for promoting fringe ideas and for promoting his blog. One example is his assertion that a mission to Mars will unleash an epidemic identical to that of the movie Andromeda strain; he swears there are live organisms on the surface of Mars right now but Wikipedia has a coverup silencing the fact. It goes on and on. Please pick your sources carefully. Thank you. BatteryIncluded (talk) 18:52, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

@BatteryIncluded: That's fine, but I didn't link to Walker or his blog in my edit. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:55, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. Peace. BatteryIncluded (talk) 18:56, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

tag

Hey can u pls label the references number 18,24,28 on this page [1]. Thanks! (119.153.58.55 (talk) 15:40, 10 March 2018 (UTC))

Nomination of Margit Sebők for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Margit Sebők is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margit Sebők until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 18:05, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Reply to Your Recent Message

Dear Ahecht,

I was not aware I had reached 830,000,000 edits. To me it doesn't seem possible I've made this many edits. Possibly, a mistake has been made as regards the number of edits made by me.

Respectfully,

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alambre (talk • contribs) 03:01, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

@Alambre: Oops, I actually meant it was the 830,000,000 edit to Wikipedia overall. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:21, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Your edit to Module:Taxonbar

Hi, after your edit to Module:Taxonbar earlier today, whenever you clicked on a Wikidata Q number in a taxonbar, it attempted to go to wikidata:$1, so I undid it. I haven't looked at it to try to see what was wrong or what you were trying to fix. Peter coxhead (talk) 21:24, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

@Peter coxhead: Thanks, I somehow missed that in the testcases. Turned out I was missing a set of parentheses. Got it all fixed now. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:06, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Ah, a parenthesis error – makes me nostalgic as I used to be a serious LISP programmer (if you know that language). Peter coxhead (talk) 07:59, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

New Page Review Newsletter No.10

Hello Ahecht, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing

Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies. A further discussion is currently taking place at: Can a subject specific guideline invalidate the General Notability Guideline?

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled

While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News

The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.

To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ahecht Screenshot 04-02-2018.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ahecht Screenshot 04-02-2018.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Qhm

Module:Qhm has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 19:11, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

RE:SVG Images

Sorry about that, I used a converted from the internet and I thought it is fine. I'll just upload them in PNG from now.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 14:02, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Upcoming changes to wikitext parsing

Hello,

There will be some changes to the way wikitext is parsed during the next few weeks. It will affect all namespaces. You can see a list of pages that may display incorrectly at Special:LintErrors. Since most of the easy problems have already been solved at the English Wikipedia, I am specifically contacting tech-savvy editors such as yourself with this one-time message, in the hope that you will be able to investigate the remaining high-priority pages during the next month.

There are approximately 10,000 articles (and many more non-article pages) with high-priority errors. The most important ones are the articles with misnested tags and table problems. Some of these involve templates, such as infoboxes, or the way the template is used in the article. In some cases, the "error" is a minor, unimportant difference in the visual appearance. In other cases, the results are undesirable. You can see a before-and-after comparison of any article by adding ?action=parsermigration-edit to the end of a link, like this: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Arthur_Foss?action=parsermigration-edit (which shows a difference in how {{infobox ship}} is parsed).

If you are interested in helping with this project, please see Wikipedia:Linter. There are also some basic instructions (and links to even more information) at https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-ambassadors/2018-April/001836.html You can also leave a note at WT:Linter if you have questions.

Thank you for all the good things you do for the English Wikipedia. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 21:18, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Qhm performance problems

Your adding {{Qhm}} to a number of football related templates has made their performance worse, so much so that it’s pushed three articles into Category:Pages with script errors – Iraq national football team results, Costa Rica national football team results and 2017–18 UEFA Europa League qualifying phase and play-off round. A few more are in Category:Pages where template include size is exceeded. --JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 21:21, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

@JohnBlackburne: I'll see what I can do to optimize the templates, but even without my changes, Iraq national football team results was using 2,003,857/2,097,152 of the post-expand include size. Based on tests of portions of that page, my template change only increased it by about 6%. Articles like that should've been split up long ago. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:42, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Why be such a pain ?

Why be such a pain.

This is about Jacques who was a Resistance Fighter in the Second WW.

People like you are so boring and a real twit.

Go stuff yourself — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:5F83:8300:ADDA:265D:568A:A242 (talk) 19:39, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

@2A00:23C5:5F83:8300:ADDA:265D:568A:A242: Nowhere in the article did it claim that the subject was anything other than a printer. Please also see WP:SOLDIER, as not all historical military figures should have their own article. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:43, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Splitting List of ... standings articles

Some of the List artictles are failing to render the final/newest standings templates, due to the large quantity of templates -as you noted. The solution is not to inline the content (cause forking where updates from the standings template to no longer automatically reflected in the List articles). We can instead split the List articles by year ranges as is already done for some of the conferences, see Category:NCAA Division I FBS football standings. I am reverting and splitting per this existing convention. Cheers, UW Dawgs (talk) 20:22, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

@UW Dawgs: Sure, that sounds like a fine solution. I was only inlining the older years, as I assumed they wouldn't change, but a cleaner solution would be to just split the articles. We'd need to make sure to update all the infoboxes that point to the list articles to point to both halves. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:24, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Done. UW Dawgs (talk) 21:06, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Vinny Pazienza-Dana Rosenblatt.

YOU say I didn't give a reliable source so you had the damned cheek to remove my additions, In the slot for the purpose I SPECIFICALLY SAID that I saw the damned fight myself years ago, I saw both fights, and I followed Pazienza. I was thinking about Paz and was watching a few of his fights on Youtube. Eventually the Rosenblatt fight turned up. I remember every bit of it. But before I made the blasted additions I saw both fights over again on Youtube just before I made the corrections.

So what the blazes more reliable a source can I find than my own acute vision and active brain. If you can think of one you are indeed a miracle man. I have made several corrections in Wiki over time and every single one is something I saw myself and absolutely know about it.

As well as seeing your so welcome message, I saw that several of my past corrections had been removed. Every correction was true and valid. You editors or censors or whatever the hell you call yourselves, have a damned nerve.

So I bid you and your Wiki a fond farewell. I am not accustomed to be insulted in such a manner, my word doubted, and my corrections deleted. Find someone else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.69.100.66 (talk) 09:27, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello, 24.69.100.66. I replied on your talk page. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:10, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Hey guy i need your help

Please email me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superdupercool123 (talk • contribs) 06:29, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

@Superdupercool123: I'd rather not expose my email address. If you need help, you can post a question here, ask at the WP:TEAHOUSE or WP:HELPDESK, post a question on your talk page and add the code {{Help me}}, or, if it's a private matter, contact the Voluteer Response Team via the email addresses listed at Wikipedia:Contact us - Readers. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:23, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello Ahecht Re Euphemism

Hello Ahecht,

I Completely understand. Whilst reading I noticed at least one error in translation. The word durchgeschleust means 'pushed through' NOT guided through

Jews would be "guided" (to their deaths) through the slave-labor and extermination camps[13]https://web.archive.org/web/20130528142643/http://www.holocaust-history.org/quick-facts/special-treatment.shtml

Es wurden durchgeschleust durch die Lager im Generalgouvernement... durch die Lager im Warthegau

Translation

It was passed through through the camps in the Generalgouvernement through the camps in the Warthegau

I will practice using the sandbox with the goal adding meaningful well-sourced contributions in the future.

Very respectfully, Neil — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neil OHanlon (talk • contribs) 02:38, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

@Neil OHanlon: I see that Google Translate translates the term as "pushed through", but every other source, including every German-to-English dictionary I could find, says it's "guided through" (or something similar such as "funneled" or "channeled" through). The word may have acquired a colloquial meaning of "pushed" because of its use during the holocaust, but there are no sources that indicate that it had that meaning at the time. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 13:40, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

@Neil OHanlon:. The nearest and most appropriate translation in this context would be 'chaneled through'. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:07, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Lua variable table key question

I'm working on something and am a bit stuck, can't find anything online except basic table tutorials/guides/etc., maybe you can help?

Given this nested table map, I want to use a variable in place of the hard-coded "Fish" in output1, since map will contain other Fish-level entries that I don't want to explicitly search for/iterate over. output2 is effectively pseudo-code, but it's what I'm trying to achieve.

Code

local map = {
	['Fish'] = { --group
		['year'] = { --smallest branch, [[Category:Fish described in 1901]]
			['parent1'] = {
				['century'] = 'century' --'year', 'decade', 'century'
			},
			['parent2'] = {
				['Animals'] = 'Animals' --[[Category:Animals described in the 20th century]]
			},
		},
		['century'] = { --parent branch, [[Category:Fish described in the 20th century]]
			['parent1'] = {
				['formal'] = 'formal'
			},
			['parent2'] = {
				['Animals'] = 'Animals'
			},
		},
	},
}

local g = 'Fish'
local output1 = map.Fish.year.parent1.century --works
local output2 = map.g.year.parent1.century --doesn't work, nil result

Is this possible/easy in Lua? ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 22:54, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

@Tom.Reding: The short answer is

local output2 = map[g].year.parent1.century

The long answer is that Lua has two ways of addressing table elements. The standard way is using brackets (e.g. map[g]["year"]["parent1"]["century"]), but if your address is a simple string, Lua provides the map.Fish.year.parent1.century syntax as syntactic sugar. If the address of the table element is an integer or a variable, not a string, you must use the bracket format. For more information, see https://www.lua.org/pil/2.5.html. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 23:14, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Brett Kimberlin

(cur | prev) 01:55, 1 May 2018‎ Ahecht (talk | contribs)‎ . . (16,558 bytes) (+6,798)‎ . . (Reverted good faith edits by BrettKimberlin (talk): Unexplained removal of content. (TW)) (undo | thank) (Tag: Undo) (cur | prev) 01:47, 1 May 2018‎ BrettKimberlin (talk | contribs)‎ . . (9,760 bytes) (-5)‎ . . (undo) (cur | prev) 01:45, 1 May 2018‎ BrettKimberlin (talk | contribs)‎ . . (9,765 bytes) (-1)‎ . . (undo) (cur | prev) 01:44, 1 May 2018‎ BrettKimberlin (talk | contribs)‎ . . (9,766 bytes) (-6,761)‎ . . (undo) (cur | prev) 00:52, 1 May 2018‎ BrettKimberlin (talk | contribs)‎ . . (16,527 bytes) (-31)‎ . . (undo)

Brett Kimberlin here. I have been dealing with the WP legal department about my page for the past two months because footnotes 8, 9 and 13 are dead links, and footnotes 2, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 17, 19, 20, 22, 23, 25, 26 and 32 are bogus. I sent Mr. Jacob Rogers all the pages from the book that are cited for information referenced in the article to show that none of them matched. So he suggested that I go into the page and remove them all and correct the page to make it more objective and current. Here is a copy of his email and the email I sent to him so you can see where I am coming from. And below that is the list of the bogus cites. I am a living person and this WP page was started by alt-right nuts who hate my progressive activities. I have asked that the page be removed but was overruled by volunteers who did nothing about the dead links or the bogus cites. Mr. Rogers noted that my request was treated cursorily. Why is it that WP publishes the most scandalous and highly charged information?

Please remove the page or at least, make the changes I made.

Extended content

Dear Mr. Kimberlin,

Thank you for sending the follow-up information and I'm sorry to hear that this is still a problem. Wikipedia does report on historical events that are considered notable due to reporting from reliable sources being available to them. The decision to have articles that discuss these types of events and about the people involved in them is one that's made by the volunteers based on the sources and their review of the topic. That said, as your email notes, it does seem like the volunteers may have done a cursory review without looking into the sources themselves in depth and there may still be an opportunity for volunteers to review the article in more detail and improve it or determine that it should be deleted. Since you have already mentioned the difficulties you've had working with the Wikipedia editors, I'm going to pass on your message to some of my colleagues in the Wikimedia Foundation community team to see if they have suggestions for how we can best pass along this information for the volunteers to review more carefully and make sure that the article and references on Wikipedia properly reflects reliable sources or are deleted if the volunteers feel that the topic no longer is notable once the sources are more closely reviewed.

Sincerely,
Jacob Rogers

Legal Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation
Dear Mr. Rogers:

I took the time today to go through the WP page and compare all of the cites to the Singer book to the actual pages in that book which only came out in hardback. Incredibly, not a single one of the roughly two dozen cites from the WP says what is contained in the book on the pages referenced. Somebody just made up the cites and the page numbers. If this shoddy and sloppy work was turned into a college professor, the student would be given a failing grade. However, the WP volunteers cavalierly and confidently said in denying my request to delete that everything has been "sourced."

So attached find a Word Doc that lists the WP footnote, the cited page numbers and a short description of the WP page content. And attached are photos of all the pages from the book. You will be shocked and appalled to find that absolutely nothing matches. This clearly calls into question the entire page and the agenda of those who peddled this bogus information and who posted the Singer cites. For WP to profess that it wants to "get it right," this shows that the more accurate meme for WP with respect to me is to "get it all wrong."

Once again, I ask that an administrator delete this page. This is really beyond the pale and the page is beyond credible correction.

Brett Kimberlin
Improperly Sourced And Cited Material On Brett Kimberin’s Wikipedia Page From Singer Book

Footnote Page Reference Description

2 110-11 LSD
4 58 21 days in prison
5 57 Invested in several businesses
7 58 Suspect in murder
10 59-60 Under surveillance
11 60 50 lb bales of pot, tried to retrieve pot, 4 year
sentence, convicted of federal off, 50 yr sent
17 117-19 Sold pot to Quayle
19 120-22 Placed in solitary
20 108 Renewed attention to Quayle
22 114-15 Blamed Scott
23 56 Signed contract with Singer
25 70 Singer didn’t believe about Quayle
26 55 Jailhouse lawyer
32 62 Filed 100’s of motions and lawsuits

— Preceding unsigned comment added by BrettKimberlin (talk • contribs) 02:20, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

@BrettKimberlin: Hi Brett. I'm sorry to hear that you're having trouble with inaccuracies on a page about you. From what you posted from Jacob Rogers' email, he didn't suggest that you edit the page directly (since Wikipedia has policies about editing pages where you have a conflict of interest), but instead said that he would send your complaint to the community team for suggestions on how to pass you complaint on to volunteer editors. I don't have the ability to receive documents through this page, but I can suggest that you email the Wikipedia Volunteer Response Team at info-en-owikimedia.org. They will be more able to deal with your issue than a Wikimedia Foundation lawyer, and have the ability to deal with personal information. I know it much be frustrating to keep getting answers that just tell you to contact someone else, but they are the ones best equipped to help you with this issue. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 02:32, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Hey Ahecht, I sent that info on May 1st to the email you suggested but have not heard a peep back from them and none of the dead links or the bad Singer book cites have resulted in any removals from the page. Can you please follow up on that asap. Thanks, Brett — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrettKimberlin (talk • contribs) 03:34, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

@BrettKimberlin: The email system might have a bit of a backlog at the moment. You might also try emailing info-en-qwikimedia.org (with a "q" instead of an "o"), which specializes in biographical issues, so they may have a better response time. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:15, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Hey Achecht, /* Brett Kimberlin */ I sent to that second email on May 9th but have not heard from either one. How about if you remove the dead links and text, and the footnotes that do not correspond to the pages in the book? There is really nothing you have to investigate to remove the dead links/text. Just click on them and you will confirm they are dead--footnotes 8, 9 and 13. If you send me your email contact info at my email address, I will send you photos of the book pages to show that not a one says what the article says. Thanks, Brett

ok

dear bot, whatever, it's your game — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.114.45.204 (talk) 18:13, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

For beta testing these changes to the English Wikipedia's Huggle configuration.

This would not have been possible without your help, and you have earned a permanent mention in the version history of this central configuration file. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:35, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Edit

Why did you put a tone template on Corona Mexico 200 (NASCAR race)? And how can I fix the issue ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kpgjhpjm (talk • contribs) 05:07, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

@Kpgjhpjm: From what I can tell (and remember, I added the tag 5 years ago), it was over the race summary sections, which were written from a fans point of view, not a neutral encyclopedic point of view, and contained lots of uncited opinion and presumption (calling a performance or a drive "impressive", calling a win "bittersweet" and a loss "heartbreaking", claiming that the home crowd was "angered", calling drivers "ringers", etc.). --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:21, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

@Ahecht: Thanks for helping . Regards , Kpgjhpjm (talk) 14:25, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018

Hello Ahecht, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

Backlog drive:

A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

Editathons

There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Paid editing - new policy

Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.

Not English

A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.

News

Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Edit to Seymour, Indiana

Hello, I'm Bedfordres. You recently reverted my edit to Seymour Indiana because my removal of content was not explained. My purpose for the edit was to remove most of the notable people from the lead and put them in the notable people section. I removed them because there were too many notable people mentioned in the lead, when they should be in the notable people section. In hindsight, I should've added more information to my edit summary, and I plan to do so in later edits. Thank you for alerting me to that problem. As for the Seymour Indiana page, I am unsure about what I do. Should I add back that information, or should I just leave the lead alone? Should I not have removed the notable people in the first place? My apologies if there is something I don't understand here. Thank you! Bedfordres (talk) 22:37, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

@Bedfordres: Thanks for the message. I hadn't noticed that the notable people had their own section. I'll restore your edit. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:43, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Super Bowl 50 Logo.svg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:02, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Brahms' Lullaby

Please stop disrupting my edits. I am in the middle of working on it and you keep reverting. This is very disruptive and does not allow me to finish my work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hushoney (talk • contribs) 02:07, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

@Hushoney: Several editors have objected to your removal of notable (if not classical) artists from the list. Please discuss at Talk:Brahms' Lullaby before further changing the list. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 02:14, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Can you help me create the reference links? Those look complicated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hushoney (talk • contribs) 02:10, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

@Hushoney: See Help:Referencing_for_beginners#Using_refToolbar, or the video at File:RefTools_rework.ogv --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 02:14, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

	Teahouse Barnstar
	This is for your valuable contributions related to teahouse. PATH SLOPU^(Talk) 06:58, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Anticaucasus mountain system

Hello, why are you not answering my questions over your actions whith my maps? I asked you few times, this is at list very in polite. And then you trying to tell me , you people are not gang up against my maps and article! You guys acting like you are some kind of "wiki-mafia".Эльбрус Казбекович (talk)

@Эльбрус Казбекович: Deletion discussions typically run for a week, although there are certain circumstances where they can end early (such as the original nominator withdrawing the decision). Under normal circumstances, an administrator will review the arguments for and against deletion at the end of the week and make the decision as to whether or not to detele the files. For the files where a valid source is listed and where that source clearly indicates that the image is freely licensed, the administrator will close the discussion without deleting the file. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:48, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Following up

Hello Ahecht, Thank you for evaluating my recent edit request on Template talk:Given name.[2] I am curious about your having stated that the request was accomplished while the page history for the template does not reflect any subsequent changes to show its actual implementation.[3] Is there something further that needs to occur or a reason that I am failing to see that rationalizes this apparent contradiction? Thank you for considering this follow-up of my earlier request.--John Cline (talk) 22:12, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

@John Cline: Very strange. I remember saving the changes to the template, and the edit summary showed up in my browser's auto-complete. In any case, I've submitted it again, so the change should be live now. −−Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 23:00, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Ahecht, I appreciate you. If you are around, and don't mind, please consider another request at Template talk:Given name#Template-protected edit request on 5 June 2018 as well. Thank you.--John Cline (talk) 12:38, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Top 25

Thanks for after writing most of one report, creating the table for the next one. Willing to write some of the comments? igordebraga ≠ 14:52, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

@Igordebraga: I started the table thinking I'd have time, but this week has turned out to be too busy for me to dedicate the time to it. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:53, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

I understand. If nobody does anything by tomorrow, maybe I'll write it (but give you a shout out). igordebraga ≠ 14:58, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Since this week's table is ready, only the writing is left to do, you're welcome to do so if you can. igordebraga ≠ 05:19, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Michael G Porter

The Michael G Porter entry mainly exists to differentiate it from another famous economist, Michael E Porter of Harvard University.

Both Porters worked at various times for the tobacco industry, and both are regularly being confused.

I'll try to add some relevant references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.106.209.175 (talk) 02:33, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I flagged the article because it didn't have any citations to reliable sources. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources for more information. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 02:42, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

File:WormsLogo.png

On the file information page, you inserted the wikicode This vector image replaces [[File:WormsLogo.png|this raster image]]. However, this is not a vector image, so the wikicode seems to be misplaced. Also note that you need to add a colon to the wikicode per WP:NFCC#9. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

@Stefan2: The history of that image is that the original uploader took the file at File:WormsLogo.gif, converted it to PNG, embedded the PNG within an SVG wrapper, and uploaded it as File:WormsLogo.svg. I then took the fake SVG, popped out the raster bits, and reuploaded them with the same description at File:WormsLogo.png. I should've removed that text, but I must've missed it. It's gone now. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 21:31, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Template:NFLPrimaryColor

No problem, I've downgraded it to template editor. It was actually set as fully protected by the previous admin and I just didn't change the move protection setting when I altered the edit protection setting. Hut 8.5 19:26, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Just saw at the RM that you were waiting for Template:NFLSecondaryColor to be downgraded as well, so I've done that one. Hut 8.5 20:33, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Hut 8.5! --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:45, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Ahecht, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!

As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: . Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: , , , .
Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Many thanks

Many thanks for drawing to my attention WP:User survey at Wikipedia: Village pump (proposals). That looks like just the type of thing in mind, but I had not come across it before, so many thanks for your help - it is appreciated. Vorbee (talk) 16:46, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Tech News: 2018-26

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

PAWS, our JupyterHub system, got an upgrade and a logo. Several bugs should be fixed.

Problems

When a link text was in italics or had other formatting you could sometimes not edit it in the visual editor. This has now been fixed. [4][5]

Changes later this week

Content translation users who translate between any two of Arabic, English, French, Japanese and Russian will be asked to be part of a research project. This is to create better tools for translating articles. [6]
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 26 June. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 27 June. It will be on all wikis from 28 June (calendar).

Meetings

You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 26 June at 18:30 (UTC). See how to join.
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 27 June at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

23:10, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Module:Cite DNV/sandbox

I've moved this module to Module:Sandbox/Ahecht/Cite DNV as a more proper name for that kind of test that doesn't go with any existing module. The Module:Cite DNV stub that you created no longer served any purpose, and thus I've nominated it for an WP:RfD. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 18:50, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Stupid autocorrect

Re the stupid autocorrect mentioned here:[7] I thougt you might enjoy (and spell-checking!) the following:

The Spell-Checker Song: Owed to a Spell Czech Her (Ode to a spellchecker)

Eye halve a spelling chequer.
It came with my pea sea.
It plane lee marks four my Rhea view,
Miss steaks aye Ken knot see.

Iran this Poe Em threw it.
Your shore lee glad two no.
It is core wrecked in every weigh,
My chequer tolled me sew.

A Czech her is a bless sing.
It freeze yew lodes of thyme.
It helps me right stiles ewe can reed,
And aides me when aye rime.

Eye strike a key and type a word.
And weight four it two say.
Weather eye am wrong oar write.
It shows me strait aweigh.

Each frays come posed up on my screen,
Is trussed two bee a Joule.
The check Ur pours o'er every word,
To Czech sum spelling rule.

As soon as a mist ache is maid.
It nose bee fore two long.
And eye can put the error rite.
Its rare lea ever wrong.

Bee fore a veiling cheque curs,
hour spelling mite decline.
If wee R. lacks oar have a laps,
We wood bee maid two wine.

Butt now bee cause my spelling,
Is checked with such grate flare,
There are know faults with in my cite,
Of nun eye am a wear.

Now spelling does knot phase me,
It does knot bring a tier.
My pay purrs awl due glad den,
With words sew fare too here.

2 rite with care is quite a fete,
Of witch won should bee proud;
and wee mussed dew the best week Anne,
Sew flaws argh[8] knot aloud.

Sow ewe can sea why aye dew prays.
Such soft wear four pea seize.
And why eye brake in 2 averse
With righting sure too please.

^{Attribution: I composed the above as a modification of various versions found on the web labeled "author unknown" or some such. Later I discovered this page, which appears to document the original sources, and my version is clearly a heavily modified derivative version of what is listed on that page. To whatever extent the above is my own work, I release it under the Creative Commons CC0 license. --Guy Macon}
--Guy Macon (talk) 22:14, 28 June 2018 (UTC) [ Citation Need ed ]

Wonderful! Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:26, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Template:Gridiron tertiary color raw

I'm not really versed in module/template stuff, so I'm not sure how to fix this, but there's a problem with the modulized version (is that a word? it is now.) of this template that's breaking other templates that it's used in. Basically, what this template is supposed to do (as I'm sure you know) is return a raw hex code (i.e. "#FFFFFF"). However, the "#", since it's at the beginning of a line, is being read as a numbered list. For example, {{Gridiron tertiary color raw|Houston Texans}} would return as

A71930

even in the middle of a line. Of course, this completely messed up Template:NFL final roster and Template:NFL final staff, both of which use it for coloring. I've temporarily reverted to the pre-module version pending a fix. Thanks, ansh 666 22:43, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

@Ansh666: Thanks for the heads up. This module is used in so many different templates, and each seems to have its own tolerance for various ways of escaping the hash sign (some work with HTML character codes, some don't, some work with <nowiki>...</nowiki>, some don't, some work without escaping it at all, some don't). I've found a solution that seems to work for the testcases at Template:Gridiron primary color/testcases, but let me know if you find anything else that it breaks. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 23:34, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Ahecht can you help me please

Ahecht Could you please help me find a source LGBT rights in Botswana article? I can't do it on my own because I'm not computer savy and I'm not good at adding references. Sphinxmystery (talk) 01:36, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

See this edit. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 01:49, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Article Wizard

Hi. I'm not sure if I understand the reason for your recent edit to the Wizard edit template. I see it as a change but not necessarily as an improvement. Are you offering to rewrite the Wizard for us? Because that's what needs to be done. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:27, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

@Kudpung: I was bringing it in line with the editnotices for other talk pages that are frequently mistaken for help pages by new users (so instead of just saying "don't edit here", it now says "here is where you can ask for help"). --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:51, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

I don't think we have an 'in line' standard format for such edit notices; who is to say what the 'official' format is? I've seen (and written) many such warning-style edit notices and they were all different. In any case, my 'in-your-face' version which you chose to tame down didn't do the trick for this customer whose edit brought the template to your attention. I have it from very long experience that most people just don't read edit notices whatever is put on them. Never mind. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:46, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

@Kudpung: I restored your text above the links section. However, no matter what we put there, there's always going to be editors that don't read it before posting. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:53, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:55, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

"Page notice" template

Thank you! for creating and adding the "Page notice" template in List of LGBT characters in television and radio. Having it is going to be tremendously helpful to all diligent editors who strive to maintain the quality of the list. Pyxis Solitary 02:04, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
@Ahecht: Hi. I just noticed that the closing bracket is missing from 2018 (<small>[Citation needed:July 2018</small>). Txs again! Pyxis Solitary 13:02, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

@Pyxis Solitary: Thanks, it should be fixed now. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 13:35, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

You're da bomb! :-) Pyxis Solitary 03:13, 11 July 2018 (UTC)