Jump to content

User talk:Hushoney

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2018

[edit]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Brahms' Lullaby, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 01:57, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Brahms' Lullaby. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 02:05, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to add or change the list, please draft it on the Talk:Brahms' Lullaby page and get consensus first. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 02:06, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]
A cup of hot tea to welcome you!

Hello, Hushoney, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 02:07, 29 May 2018 (UTC) Jim1138 (talk) 02:07, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Why does it have to be by "classical artists"? Primary criteria is that it be by notable artists. Also, your content was unsourced. See wp:Citing sources and wp:reliable sources. To add a citation, please see wp:referencing for beginners and help:footnotes Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 02:07, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please be aware that wp:Wikipedia is anonymous and we have no idea what your qualifications are. Therefore wp:verifiability and wp:citing sources Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 02:09, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Brahms' Lullaby, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 02:13, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reverted by two experienced editors. Please stop. Read wp:BRD get wp:consensus first. Also suggest reading wp:Ownership of content Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 02:12, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Brahms' Lullaby. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 02:14, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Brahms' Lullaby.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Brahms' Lullaby was changed by Hushoney (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.918428 on 2018-05-29T02:16:05+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:16, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

[edit]
Under construction icon

Thank you for your recent contributions. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 02:21, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Hushoney reported by User:Jim1138 (Result: ). Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 02:26, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! 5 albert square (talk) 13:31, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Brahms Lullaby

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:16, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]