User talk:Agora

Mark Redshaw

Any reason why you blindly undid my edit, when we are both trying to clear this article of the vandalism? Giant Snowman 20:42, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

in order to revert 17:17, 3 October 2011 212.187.67.140 I had to revert your 17:37, 3 October 2011 GiantSnowman first. The edits by Fbagent1 make sense by the way. But a few things need proper sources. Agora (talk) 20:45, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, the edits are unreferenced, and so have no place on Wikipedia. Other information included (i.e. the Wrexham stats) is just plain wrong. Giant Snowman 20:46, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:Mark Redshaw#RS to V. Giant Snowman 20:55, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dutch football BLPs

You HAVE to add a reliable source whenever adding information about a living person, in order to verify the claims. This is basic, core stuff. Please start including sources. Regards, Giant Snowman 10:16, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wilfried Bony

I want just to let you know that these stats for Issia Wazi that you're so desperately including were falsed by User:Zombie433 and then copied on Wilfried's website. When he created this article he put 22 (6)[1] and after few minutes he changed to 16 (6)[2], this is his common behavior, adding random false stats. I wonder why you don't want to include also another rubbish from User:Zombie433 copied on Wilfried's website -that Wilfried was a topscorer of Côte d'Ivoire Premier Division in 2007?--Oleola (talk) 02:19, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Oleola, I'm not familiar with the behavior of User:Zombie433 but I see he has been blocked. I do wonder how he should be able to change information on Bony's website which apparently is the only source for his time in Côte d'Ivoire. I haven't seen this website to be a total fraud. The topscorer claim for the league is incorrect, that was easy to find in the league stats, but it wasn't written that clear on that site. You can also read it that he was clubtopscorer for Issia Wazi. I haven't find other information on (the archive of) that website that might be incorrect so far. Agora (talk) 13:45, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Chima Onyeike. Thank you. Giant Snowman 15:35, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ah, not a direct revert. That's an improvement. Agora (talk) 15:45, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll directly revert if I can't find a source - one was easy enough to locate on this article, though. Any reason why you didn't add one, despite numerous previous requests from myself to use sources on BLPs? Giant Snowman 15:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't? Take a better look at my edits. Almost all, if not an minor edit or statistic, are proper sourced. In this case I was not finished yet. Agora (talk) 15:52, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You don't - unreferenced, unreferenced, unreferenced - plus all the earlier examples. Oh look, a completely unreferenced article that remains unreferenced after more than a month. How long do you need to "finish" your edits? If you had a source to make the edit, why not include it in said edit? Giant Snowman 15:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations you've found a few. Two minor edits, even statistics, and indeed one article that should've said that it was completely based on the Dutch interwiki (Is there such a template?) which has an external link for the statistics. Agora (talk) 16:15, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there's "a few" - but there should be none. Regarding the Beloften Eredivisie page, you only added an external link after I marked it as unreferenced. If it's been translated, you can use {{Translated page}}. Giant Snowman 16:20, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chinpa Tenpel

An article that you have edited has been nominated for deletion. I would appreciate your feedback at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinpa Tenpel. gidonb (talk) 02:10, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. When you recently edited Johannes Christoffel van Mastenbroek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dutch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:21, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Remko Bicentini, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Giant Snowman 10:45, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me? We had a discussion before and I'm done with your behavior here. Any new edits from you on this page will be deleted without any notice. Agora (talk) 11:22, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have a long history of adding unreferenced information to articles (especially those about living people) - you have been here too long to be ignorant of WP:RS, WP:V and WP:BLP. Delete my comments if you wish; but as stated above, I will block you if you continue. Giant Snowman 12:27, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you had looked at any of my other addition from this morning you could see that they're all proper sourced and that there was absolutely no pattern. Therefore you waving with last warnings and blocks is way overdone and also a violation of Wikipedia:Assume good faith. Agora (talk) 13:09, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some edits being sourced is not enough; all should be and you have had more than enough warnings about this in the past. It is hard to AGF when you present a very combative attitude. Giant Snowman 13:19, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well it's hard for me to see AGF in your actions when you only use this kind of warnings and the revert button. 'Almost all' instead of 'almost none' is already a major improvement. And besides, have any of my (not yet sourced) edits ever proven to be hoaxed, vandalism or any other unwanted contribution? Just a reminder for this one was more than enough for now with the same result. I considered the 'warning' above way overdone in a non constructive way. Agora (talk) 13:39, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced information in any/all articles - especoally those concerning living people - is rightly a major concern of many editors here, myself included. I find it much safer to remove the unreferenced rather than leave it in the mere hope it's correct because Person X has added it and they have added fine stuff in the past. Giant Snowman 13:57, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, and I absolutely agree. But still something to consider in the way to respond. These kind a 'major' warnings are not helping and are only negative while a lot of progress is made. Agora (talk) 09:33, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ruurd Woltring & Triumph of Gold

Eigenlijk heb je wel gelijk. Die 2 artikelen mogen wel worden verwijderd. Alleen weet ik niet hoe ik dat voor elkaar moet krijgen. / You're actually right. These 2 articles can be removed. However, I don't know how to make that happen. Ruurd Woltring (talk) 08:05, 29 January 2013 (CET)

BSV Juniors Villach

A tag has been placed on BSV Juniors Villach, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - Camyoung54 talk 21:16, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Japanese occupation of Indonesia

FYI, there is a RM discussion there. Cheer. ༆ (talk) 20:20, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Yellow Claw (DJs) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

members = Bizzey (Leonardo Roelandschap)<br/>Jim Aasgier (Jim Taihuttu)<br/>Nizzle (Nils Rondhuis))

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:39, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Andersson Jamal

Thank you for your constructive comments on Talk:Andersson Jamal. After reading the deletion logs on nl.wikipedia.org, I decided to nominate the article on Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion. It would be great if you could add to the discussion on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andersson Jamal. Thanks again, Pjposullivan (talk) 16:53, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

André Onana

Please use WP:RM - all sources have him as 'André'. Giant Snowman 12:37, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Pagnam

Hi Agora, I noticed you edited Fred Pagnams Wikipedia page and said he had a Dutch wife. He was my Grandad and his wife was english. I just wondered where u got your information from as we know he was involved with the Dutch resistance in the war and I wonder if this has something to do with it? Regards Rob Dixon. Rob@joineryworkshop.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.164.119.188 (talk) 23:27, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rob, that was an edit in 2011 so I had to look into it. At least I found it mentioned here [3]. If incorrect please let me know.

I found a few further things as well. In 1933 he was appointed co-trainer at HVV Den Haag besides Fred Warburton.[4] He was trainer of WFC Rapiditas (now FC Weesp) in het 1934/35 season.[5] His spell with De Volewijckers was once a week, normal at the time. He is also mentioned as trainer at HFC Haarlem in 1938 [6] and in October 1939. [7] Most likely Haarlem was his final club in the Netherlands before WW2 and CVV Vriendenschaar a once a week job. [8] He was about to train PSV Eindhoven in 1935 but extended his contract at DWV instead.[9], [10] In 1935 he had a booklet published with radio commenter Han Hollander by the name Voetballen (Uitgeversmaatschappij Kosmos, Amsterdam) [11] Regards, Agora (talk) 09:03, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rob, I think Pagnam married Frederika Kousemaker in 1940 (in England). Cattivi (talk) 20:57, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

KNVB Cup

Can you improve also KNVB Cup, the "red" seasons, in English wikipedia ? Thanks.--Alexiulian25 (talk) 18:42, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Agora. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Agora. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Agora. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Agora. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Job Komol

The article Job Komol has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 21:38, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Annick Lipman ‎

Hey. I think the article must be tweaked as she was in the pre-squad but was never registred to enter into a game, see the team roster and the team total statistics. So, she should not be presented as winning the medal. That's how it is done on wikipedia for the handball ec/wc tournaments. Kante4 (talk) 20:21, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it seems there is a discrepancy here. IHF includes in these links only players who actually played in a game. The national association named her in the final squad (not pre-squad) for the tournament. [12] She also was presented a gold medal as part of the winning team. Clear picture [13] (goalkeeper above with medal nr 41). Agora (talk) 22:40, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... we always went after the official pdf files to determine the squad lists. Now she was never eligible to enter into a game, so i still say she should not be listed but see editors doing the opposite and showing evidence that she has a medal, so it's ok. Kante4 (talk) 06:19, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Miel Campioni" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Miel Campioni has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 5 § Miel Campioni until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:42, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]