User talk:Aditya891891

Welcome!

Hello, Aditya891891, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Aditya891891, good luck, and have fun. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:11, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Aditya891891/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Aditya891891/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 15:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello. Per the notice you received above, a tag had been placed on user:Aditya891891/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. Please note that after review, I have removed the deletion request so you do not need to worry about this page being speedily deleted. However, speedy deletion is not the only deletion processes on Wikipedia; my removal does not prevent users from invoking other, longer term deletion methods, such as for an article, proposing its deletion or nominating it at articles for deletion. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 15:44, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Aditya891891 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have done nothing wrong but still blocked for 2 months. Please review this request and let me edit the wiki page i was creating Aditya891891 (talk) 17:12, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I have granted you WP:IPBE for 1 month to allow you to edit through the range block. PhilKnight (talk) 21:21, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please place new comments at the bottom. I see no block on your account directly. What is the exact message that you see when you attempt to edit? 331dot (talk) 17:50, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All IPs and IP ranges this editor has been using are blocked, the one in questions as "{{CheckUser block}}: extensive spam and proxy abuse on this range". (The other two rangeblocks are anon-only.) --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:08, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpgordon, does it look like this user is supposed to have been caught by that block? I don't know what kind of spam we're talking about here. So far their only creation is promotional in tone, unreferenced, and possibly an AI creation, but I wouldn't call it "spam". -- asilvering (talk) 04:57, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dunno; the rangeblock is by HJ Mitchell, who might have an opinion. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 05:37, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpgordon:, @Asilvering:, @331dot: The admin issuing the block has been active but has not commented here (This time of year is extremely busy for arbitrators). This user does not appear to be the intended subject of the block, even if their contribs aren't exactly NPOV. Lifting the entire rangeblock doesn't seem like the right solution, but I suspect granting IPBE would also not be a popular decision. Thoughts? Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 00:53, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I don't really see the problem in a time-limited "WP:ROPE IPBE". I think it's normally granted for periods of several months, but we could hand it out for a shorter time. I don't see any indication that this user is spamming, so I think the worst-case scenario is some AfC reviewers get annoyed. In the best-case scenario, @Aditya891891 will have managed to complete an article that shows they ought to get IPBE for longer. -- asilvering (talk) 01:40, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think granting IPBE for a month makes sense as a compromise. PhilKnight (talk) 17:35, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do we usually grant IPBE to editors with essentially 1 edit? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:20, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is WP:IAR territory I admit. PhilKnight (talk) 18:36, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If HJ Mitchell is going to keep doing these rangeblocks that catch all kinds of collateral damage or plausible collateral damage, we may have to start making it a habit. -- asilvering (talk) 18:42, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Beeblebrox: @331dot: - what do you think about 1 month IPBE? PhilKnight (talk) 20:36, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's our best option at this point. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 20:47, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have no objection. 331dot (talk) 21:10, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

IP block exempt

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit the English Wikipedia through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions. Inappropriate usage of this user right may result in revocation. I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. PhilKnight (talk) 21:21, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]