User talk:Abrasax123

Welcome!

Hello, Abrasax123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Oromo Expansions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! jlwoodwa (talk) 20:05, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Oromo people have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 14:42, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Your recent editing history at Oromo people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Drmies (talk) 23:06, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oromo expansion

Hi, the source from Richard pranukst book say and I quote; “for the most part the Oromo lived south of present day Ethiopia”. That is northern Kenya. He mentioned no word of southern Ethiopia. 2A00:A041:3D5E:CB00:AC7C:91D:C7B0:742D (talk) 00:39, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdissa Aga (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Johannes Maximilian were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please tune down the tone and fix the duplicate references. Also note that the lead section should summarise an article's contents. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 10:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdissa Aga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 10:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder about edit warring

It looks like you're in the midst of an edit war at Boorana and possibly other articles. Remember that WP:3RR is a bright-line rule that you can be blocked for violating, unless you meet a limited number of exceptions. —C.Fred (talk) 04:30, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, regarding the image you've added to Boorana, could you provide some more information about when you took it and where (or who, generally) you were visiting on the trip when you took the pic? —C.Fred (talk) 04:32, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. LucasKannou (talk) 04:34, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Abrasax123 reported by User:LucasKannou (Result: ). Thank you. LucasKannou (talk) 04:39, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31h for WP:3RR. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 07:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Yejju people

Hi, I was asked to look into an edit conflict concerning this article. What is the major differences between the two versions of this article? I've looked at both versions, & beyond the fact one has 6 citations & the other 5, I don't see any differences. I find this dispute odd, but there have been more bitter fights over more trivial matters. -- llywrch (talk) 17:18, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no conflict; I was updating and correcting the article. The initial article had many grammar mistakes and bias, so what I did was I got information from the past history of the article and connected it with the article that I changed. Perhaps the person who is attempting to have conflict with me finds that what I corrected was biased? I am not sure. Abrasax123 (talk) 20:45, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since the anon IPv6 editor continues to revert this article, I've asked for another admin to intervene. (I have no good way to inform the anon editor.) -- llywrch (talk) 00:30, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, my compromise version of that article was protected. If you have any suggestions to improve it -- & I know there are several -- feel free to post them on the talk page for the time being. -- llywrch (talk) 18:12, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Your recent editing history at Amhara people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Socialwave597 (talk) 11:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello, I'm Socialwave597. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Balcha Safo seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Socialwave597 (talk) 02:23, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that Wikipedia aims to achieve correct information and prevent misinformation. The article of Balcha Safo had citations that did not say he was of Gurage descent. In fact, I have looked far and wide and haven't found one source of even claiming Balcha Safo of being Gurage. The only sources I found was his ethnicity being of Oromo descent. Abrasax123 (talk) 13:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Amhara people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Gyrofrog (talk) 02:14, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

Is there any reason why you keep reverting my edits without adequate reason? Your rationale appears lacking. There are numerous pages employing a similar format. Collages in articles save space and show lots of different things in a small area, making the reading experience better. Moreover, the earlier version of the page neglected to feature several crucial figures from this ethnic group, a mistake now remedied in the updated content. Furthermore, I've included additional images and made improvements to the page. Please refrain from reverting these changes. JUMPp1harm (talk) 00:33, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've already stated my reason. You should read my reasoning again. I will explain it to you here once again. Collages are not appropriate when the article is referring to an ethnicity. Show me an ethnic article that has a format like that. Abrasax123 (talk) 00:49, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Arabic version of the Oromo page follows this format. As I've mentioned before, your reasoning is insufficient. Do you see how sections like Music, Literature, and Food have collages of images representing their respective topics? Given this, why wouldn't it be appropriate to have a collage featuring more prominent individuals who go beyond their personal skills? Overall it fits the page more. So respectfully, stop revering my changes JUMPp1harm (talk) 00:58, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Who is talking about Arabic? I am referring to the English locations of Wikipedia. Find me one article that is related to an ethnicity that has that format. Sections like Music, Literature, and food are ok with collages because they are not based around an ethnic group. Another line of reasoning is that the people shown in the collages are already mentioned in the article if you even checked. The Amhara article has already been through this some months ago and we reverted and it was justified, so if you want to start problems then that is fine with me. You are the one who will be getting the punishment, likely a ban from editing. Abrasax123 (talk) 01:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why does it matter what language it is in? The format is still used nonetheless. I decided to implement this format for the page after observing it on the Arabic Oromo page, and I'm certain that similar formats exist on other English pages as well. This format aligns better with the page because each section already features various images of people representing that particular aspect. It only seems logical to apply the same approach to the main image with prominent individuals especially for significant figures within the ethnic group, such as Haile Selassie, who previously wasn't even included on the page. Overall, this format enhances the page's coherence and relevance, prioritizing important individuals over random ones. If my efforts to improve the page result in a ban, then so be it. JUMPp1harm (talk) 01:29, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:14, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please stop. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Fantastic Mr. Fox (talk) 12:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject

Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Oromo people, would you be interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 20:45, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Abdissa Aga

Hello, Abrasax123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Abdissa Aga, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:05, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Abdissa Aga

Hello, Abrasax123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Abdissa Aga".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]