User talk:Abdullah1099

Spectrum (rocket) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Spectrum (rocket), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ost (talk) 07:53, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Daytona (rocket) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Daytona (rocket), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ost (talk) 07:54, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TDS-01 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to TDS-01. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Uncle Spock (talk) 16:52, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of spaceflight launches in July–December 2023, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page C59. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:33, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is also a ISRO's PSLV mission Code Abdullah1099 (talk) 11:13, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TeLEOS-2 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, TeLEOS-2, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Arabsat 7B (BADR-8) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Arabsat 7B (BADR-8). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 07:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to details

Hi, I've seen that you've become more active in the spaceflight pages, and I would like to remind you to pay attention to some important details like updating the sources whenever you make any edit like updating the status of a launch, keeping the payloads in alphabetical order, checking for duplicates, distinguishing when batches of satellites deserve a single entry or multiple entries and so on. It's nice to have an extra helping hand but not if that means double checking every new edit. Thanks. Fm3dici97 (talk) 12:50, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Abdullah1099 less than 24h after this message I see that you keep adding edits without caring for details: on top of them, the update of the Chandrayaan-3 launch date without updating the source, and the addition of a launch of Jilin-1 satellites in June 2023 with empty links ignoring that a page for the Jilin-1 constellation already exists. Again, since this kind of edits require a constant double check to correct mistakes and add extra references your work might be flagged as disruptive with all the consequences of the case. Please, modify your behavior. Fm3dici97 (talk) 09:54, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the trouble you got from my edits on the Wikipedia page.

But I am new and I didn't know how all the mechanisms for editing on Wikipedia works and l upload the edits on the basis of news from the Internet, newspapers, twitter,etc. Abdullah1099 (talk) 10:05, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You also add lot of speculated dates, do not do that. Read Wikipedia guidelines. Each piece of information added should have citation from reputable sources like official sources, news outlets etc and Twitter is not a reliable source. Ohsin 22:12, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Abdullah1099 (talk) 03:39, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will take care about date of Launch of rockets.because I am new to Wikipedia editing.i need help on my some edits.

Thanks for the information provided by you.

Thank you Abdullah1099 (talk) 03:48, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I ask one thing,

Why you have deleted my edits on future pslv launches

But I had taken the information from Wikipedia only

You can find it on Spaceflight in 2024,2025,2026,2027,2028,2029.

If it is correct then please undo the deleted section.Ok

Thanking you,

Yours faithfully

Abdullah1099 Abdullah1099 (talk) 03:53, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We need Wikipedia:Reliable sources for every piece of information. Add citations in your next edit. Ohsin 11:35, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok Abdullah1099 (talk) 13:58, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add or modify information without citations! Ohsin 21:27, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now I am adding or modify information with Citation. Abdullah1099 (talk) 02:55, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chollima-1 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Chollima-1. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:51, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Missing edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! —Mykhal (talk) 12:19, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:08, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of sources and conventions ignored

Hi, I hate to repeat myself but here we go again. Whenever you make any change to the spaceflight timeline, you have to:

Add an update source that confirms the change you're making, any information has to be supported by external sources and not solely by the fact that you read it somewhere;
In every monthly section order the launches first by date, then alphabetically by launch vehicle, and finally alphabetically by the name of the payload.

Not respecting these rules means forcing other editors to constantly double check any change. I've already tried to advise you about these details above, please behave accordingly. Fm3dici97 (talk) 09:49, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok Abdullah1099 (talk) 11:22, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Abdullah1099 as you keep engaging in edits without adding sources or updating preexisting ones, despite numerous attempts to make you change your behaviour both here and in the comments of your reverted edits, I'll bring the issue to the Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents asking for restrictions on your editing permissions. Here's the formal notification:

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Fm3dici97 (talk) 15:49, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for inconvenience from my edits.

I will work with you and learn from your edits. From now onward i will do not so much editing on any subject. I will follow and tried to add some citations on any edit.

Please cancel my case from the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Sorry,Sorry..... Abdullah1099 (talk) 06:20, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, the case has been cancelled.. It's not a huge deal, we've all been through the moment where we had to learn from more expert users how to correctly handle wikipedia, making mistakes and listening to other people's advices about them. That's all I'm asking for. Thanks for your comprehension. Fm3dici97 (talk) 16:52, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Bro for your help.

Thank you very much. Abdullah1099 (talk) 17:00, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rocket Factory Augsburg

In your edit of 07:24, 7 June 2023 (UTC) of Rocket Factory Augsburg, you inserted <ref name="LS_AU4702" /> without defining it. Kindly insert a definition for this ref name. —Anomalocaris (talk) 21:51, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Abdullah1099 (talk) 02:27, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This ref name is found in List of PSLV launches:

<ref name= "LS_AU4702">{{Cite web |date=29 March 2023 |title=Government of India, Department of Space: Lok Sabha, Unstarred question number 4702 |url=https://pqals.nic.in/annex/1711/AU4702.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230329144006/https://pqals.nic.in/annex/1711/AU4702.pdf |archive-date=30 March 2023}}</ref>

If that's the right definition, please copy it into Rocket Factory Augsburg. —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nano-Satallite Launch vehicle

Hello, Abdullah1099. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nano-Satallite Launch vehicle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nano-Satallite Launch vehicle

Hello, Abdullah1099. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nano-Satallite Launch vehicle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:08, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of sources (again)

Hi, I'm reaching out to you because once again I noticed that you keep making edits in the spaceflight schedule without updating the sources. I would like to remind you that ANY kind of modification of that schedule has to be supported by updated sources, it's not sufficient to move things around according to your own personal knowledge. If you don't do it, other users are forced to track down your edits and intervene to correct your mistakes. This is the third time that I remind you this, so from now on I will treat any continuation of this behavior as an intentional disregard for Wikipedia rules and act accordingly. Fm3dici97 (talk) 13:35, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok Abdullah1099 (talk) 13:38, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Fm3dici97 (talk) 10:35, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Abdullah1099 (talk) 11:16, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of spaceflight launches in July–December 2023, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CASC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:AgilSpace

Hello, Abdullah1099. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:AgilSpace, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Spectrum (rocket)

Hello, Abdullah1099. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Spectrum (rocket), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Daytona (rocket)

Hello, Abdullah1099. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daytona (rocket), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:TDS-01

Hello, Abdullah1099. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:TDS-01, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:TeLEOS-2

Hello, Abdullah1099. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:TeLEOS-2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Arabsat 7B (BADR-8)

Hello, Abdullah1099. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arabsat 7B (BADR-8), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Spectrum (rocket)

Hello, Abdullah1099. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Spectrum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:01, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Daytona (rocket)

Hello, Abdullah1099. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Daytona".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:01, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:TDS-01

Hello, Abdullah1099. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "TDS-01".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:01, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Arabsat 7B (BADR-8)

Hello, Abdullah1099. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arabsat 7B".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:29, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2024

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2024, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:25, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anik (satellite)

Check the links before you make them. All of these were circular redirects that returned the reader back to the Anik page. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DSN Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page H3.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Including sources

Hi Abdullah1099, you added information to Prophet's Mosque recently ([1]), but you didn't include any citations to reliable sources. Please remember that all content on Wikipedia must be supported by reliable sources, per Wikipedia:Verifiability. Can you please provide a source which verifies the names and positions of these imams at the mosque? (For example: an official source, if there is one, news articles from reliable sources, etc.) R Prazeres (talk) 00:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Abdullah1099 (talk) 02:10, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced edits

It has been one year, and you keep vandalizing the spaceflight launch pages with unsourced modifications all the time. Every time you make a change, the source you include should support the change you made. It is not enough to make changes just because someone told you, it's not enought to make changes just because you read it somewhere, it is not enought to make changes just by copypasting sources from a similar launch. On top of that, you keep ignoring the very basic convention of ordering launches alphabetically, by launch vehicle first and by payload for the same launch vehicle, despite multiple attempts to remind you of that. Please, pay attention to this or I will once again be forced to open a procedure against you in the administrators' board to restrict your edit permissions. Fm3dici97 (talk) 09:51, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will do the right steps told by you. Abdullah1099 (talk) 12:37, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mate you are still editing without any kind of source!!!!! All the times! Gio9999 (talk) 08:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello, I'm Ohsin. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kulasekarapattinam_Spaceport, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ohsin 19:33, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for your edits

Hi, I've seen that in many cases for upcoming Chinese launches you've attached as source the Chinese Wikipedia. I'm sorry but that's not a valid source, either you link the original source for that specific launch, or you leave the launch out. (And to be fair, I know the guy who is taking care of the Chinese Wikipedia, half of the time his edits are based on his personal speculations, so he and the page are not to be conisdered reliable sources). Please update the sources or remove the launches that cannot be linked to a reliable source. Thanks, Fm3dici97 (talk) 10:06, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove them because it is part of Wikipedia but in Chinese and both are similar and it gave us a speculation and Tentitive launch time and if the launch does not occur at the given time in the month and no updates come from the specific launch then i will remove them. THANK YOU. Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:39, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Abdullah1099 all the things published in Wikipedia must come from a reliable source, without exceptions. Cross-referencing a Wikipedia in another language whose contents come from guesses and speculations is the opposite of using a reliable source. So either you find an alternative source to the Chinese Wikipedia, or you remove the launch. Fm3dici97 (talk) 07:52, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Abdullah1099 (talk) 08:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1968 in spaceflight, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Voskhod and LC-13.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rapid Launch Small Satellite moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Rapid Launch Small Satellite. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Abdullah1099. Thank you for your work on Gaganyaan-3. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:43, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1970 in spaceflight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LC-13.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2025 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2025. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 10:52, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Isaidnoway (talk) 04:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to List of spaceflight launches in July–December 2024, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Isaidnoway (talk) 04:46, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of spaceflight launches in July–December 2024, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vulcan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Long March 6A G6 launch

Hello, I was just wandering where you got the launch time for LM6A G60 launch on 5th of August from?, I’m just very curious and could use it for a source in the future. 51.37.127.70 (talk) 15:00, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes, But i didn't added the LM6A G60 Launch. Abdullah1099 (talk) 15:30, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You added the G-60 launch on the page “Long March 6A” “List of launches” 51.37.127.70 (talk) 18:43, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of star systems within 500-550 light-years

The article List of star systems within 500-550 light-years has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While the nearest star systems to Earth are regularly discussed as a group, there doesn't seem to be such list notability for these farther away. If this site can be believed, "There are 271,732 stars within 1,000 light-years of Earth which are visible in a backyard telescope." Are we really going to list them all by distance to Earth?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:58, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not listing all stars in 1000 light years, i am only adding some variable stars and stars with planets, Supernova Candidate,etc. I am adding stars and expanding this to help the future generations. So, No need need of delete the article. Thank you. Abdullah1099 (talk) 14:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of star systems within 500-550 light-years for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of star systems within 500-550 light-years is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of star systems within 500-550 light-years until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 14:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why there is need of deleting this. Abdullah1099 (talk) 09:28, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what are the concerns of this article please tell me. Abdullah1099 (talk) 09:29, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And last but not the least, My humble request is to cancel the deleting process. Abdullah1099 (talk) 09:31, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the problem is that in 1000 ly is 2000+ Stars or every star can be seen by Amateur Astronomer or What. Abdullah1099 (talk) 09:36, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then first think of people who Catalogued every star is more hard than adding stars in the table like format is much much easy than Cataloguing every Stars. These list of stars are a tiny bit or less than 10% of what the peoples who Catalogued each stars and every thing has done. Abdullah1099 (talk) 09:39, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why you guys are becoming inhuman like. It's our duty to expand these list of stars within one ly to another ly to as much as 5,000+ ly as the more sources has come to us and more stars had already been Catalogued. Abdullah1099 (talk) 09:43, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

why your mouth is shut up now what happened to you. Abdullah1099 (talk) 14:34, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only you are making nuesense and difficulty to make this when there is no lack of sources, (Personal attacks removed) Abdullah1099 (talk) 14:36, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of supernova candidates, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carina.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:51, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of star systems within 700-750 light-years for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of star systems within 700-750 light-years is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of star systems within 700-750 light-years until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 16:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with List of star systems within 700-750 light-years. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 16:24, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The main problem is no reply come from other side and rude behaviour from this guy Fram. Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think 3-4 days has gone but no reply has been given by other side and thus no identification of the problems. Thus, these kind of behaviour made this a kind of nonsense that no one can increase anything even many new information has come. Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:30, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of Fram's behavior, you must not remove AfD notices while the discussion is still ongoing. jlwoodwa (talk) 16:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also know but no reply make us aggressive, how can we join the discussion. Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:38, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion is happening at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of star systems within 700-750 light-years. Please remember not to be aggressive, even if you disagree with other editors or feel that you are being treated poorly. jlwoodwa (talk) 16:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:44, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 16:41, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of star systems within 800-850 light-years for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of star systems within 800-850 light-years is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of star systems within 700-750 light-years until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

jlwoodwa (talk) 16:32, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fantasy times

Please stop adding fantasy times such as "5:79" into the List of spaceflight launches in July-December 2024. You've done it multiple times so if it's just a mistake I'm unsure how you would make the same mistake with several fantasy times that often. It's been adressed on the article's talk page already. 2001:4BC9:1F98:459E:B4D4:EED1:1F40:82ED (talk) 11:41, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is kind of calculation mistakes done by me while converting IST to UTC. Sorry Abdullah1099 (talk) 13:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Abdullah1099. Thank you for your work on Gaganyaan-2. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:02, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: Thank you very much. Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:05, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But, I have a question how this reviewing mechanism works, Can you please understand me this. Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of star systems within 550-600 light-years

The article List of star systems within 550-600 light-years has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

List is blank, and per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of star systems within 500-550 light-years, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of star systems within 700-750 light-years

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rapid Launch Small Satellite

Hello, Abdullah1099. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rapid Launch Small Satellite, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:49, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of New Glenn first-stage boosters moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of New Glenn first-stage boosters. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it needs a lead section. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:36, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of spaceflight launches in July–December 2024, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ariane.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Your edit to Hera (space mission) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. -- Diannaa (talk) 21:45, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2025

Hello, Abdullah1099. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2025, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I will edit it. Abdullah1099 (talk) 16:15, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2025 (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

This draft is too soon to be published. Please wait until 2025, when more informations will be available.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of spaceflight launches in January–June 2025 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 09:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abdullah1099! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 09:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks!

This isn't the first time that you've been asked to provide summaries with your edits. IS there a reason you're not willing to do so? -- mikeblas (talk) 17:22, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Thank you very much. I every time forgot to add summarise. Sorry for that. Abdullah1099 (talk) 04:09, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]