User talk:Aaroncrudge

This is Aaroncrudge's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Go Coach (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Go Coach instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft contains more information than the article. The article should be expanded.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Go Coach and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Go Coach, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:49, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aaroncrudge! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:49, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	Thank you for your contributions to British railway station articles. It's a tough slog to keep every page updated with service frequencies, rolling stock, ownership, etc., but know that you're making a big difference a few hundred characters at a time. This Working Wikipedian's Barnstar is for you -- thanks again! ~Sp K 17:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for those words and for the support!! Aaroncrudge (talk) 10:33, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, however.

Hey I just want to say thanks for most of your edits to Congleton Railway station.

However I now ask that you leave the page alone as it is now as up to date and perfect as it is going to look.

P.S. in future, don’t copy my reasons for edits as reasons for your edits. Maurice Oly (talk) 14:02, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Maurice Oly: Thanks for recognizing users' contributions, but you don't WP:OWN any pages or your edit summaries. Even featured articles have room for improvement: we ought not to discourage anybody's contributions to this collaborative project. ~Sp K 20:41, 27 February 2021 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please use citations

Hi. Thanks for your edits to various Bristol railway stations, updating the service pattern for 2021. I was wondering if you could you please use inline citations when doing so? This way people can refer to the source rather than just having to take the article's word for it. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for your message. I have completed all the updates to the Severn Beach Line for the time being but will make sure to use inline citations going forward. Thanks! Aaroncrudge (talk) 14:04, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A big thank you cookie!

Hello! Big thanks from me for all your help updating the service patterns at so many stations. I'm slowly working my way through updating a load of Scottish stations (see, for example, stations on the Far North Line, Highland Main Line and Dundee-Aberdeen-Inverness line), so it's great to see someone else committed to updating these as well! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 16:59, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to a WikiProject

Hi Aaron, I wondered whether you wanted to join the UK Rail WikiProject (WP:UKRAIL)? It's a good place to discuss things with other editors and doesn't really require a lot of paying attention too much! I think it would be good for you to come on over after your tremendous work updating probably hundreds of articles! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:44, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Matt, thanks so much for the invite, I really appreciate it! I've joined the group upon your invite (hopefully correctly!). I really appreciate your thanks as its great to have made so many (hopefully positive!) updates that are hopefully making pages easier for everyone to use. Thanks so much! Aaroncrudge (talk) 23:02, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: London Buses route SL10 (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources, all bar one, are TFL. Please can we have references with commentary about the topic of this route to verify any notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:London Buses route SL10 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:50, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: London Buses route SL10 has been accepted

London Buses route SL10, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S5A-0043^Talk 02:04, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chiltern Cherwell service?

I find it weird that Chiltern would not list Heyford and Tackley on their website, nor include them on their latest timetable, even in notes. However, the eNRT also exists, so if both of these stations appear there in the same service listed at Chiltern, I will not take opposition to your recent reversions. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 17:58, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is certainly strange that it's not listed on the Chiltern Website although this may be because it's a parliamentary style service - a similar situation exists where Northern do not produce a timetable for services at Denton and Reddish South so I dont think it's an isolated oddity. Chiltern definitely do call at both stations though as confirmed on the National Rail timetable. Aaroncrudge (talk) 18:14, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]