User talk:ASHMRY786

List of insurance companies in India

Please ONLY include companies that already have a Wikipedia article, as that page clearly states, and do NOT add your name to ANY Wikipedia article, as this is against our policies - Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 20:07, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is not appropriate. You are saying if just because non-availability of article on wiki, the company should not be included. This is totally unreasonable and foolish.

Please get it undo except the name.Thanks - ASHMRy786 (talk4) 01:57, 21 October 2017 (INDIAN)

Edit

ARE YOU CRAZY?

THERE ARE 24 AND 30 INSURANCE COMPANIES. AND. U R SAYING NOT TO ADD THEM ASHMRY786 (talk) 20:12, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

ARE YOU CRAZY?

THERE ARE 24 AND 30 INSURANCE COMPANIES. AND. U R SAYING NOT TO ADD THEM ASHMRY786 (talk) 20:12, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello ASHMRY786 please undo the Caps Lock on your keyboard, as you appear to be shouting. In addition, please start new posts at the foot of any talk page, including a new title, rather than hiding them in the middle of the page. As for List of insurance companies in India, as it clearly states in several places on the edit page "ONLY ADD A COMPANY TO THIS LIST IF IT ALREADY HAS AN ENGLISH WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE" This is very clear explanation, so why did you add numerous companies without an article? - Arjayay (talk) 20:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC) Are you the owner of Wikipedia. This is a matter of our India. You don't have right to what to include what not to include. There are 24 Life Insurance Companies and 30 Non-Life Insurance Companies in India licensed under IRDA. As per your opinion, only those companies which have article should be included. This is totally pointless. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ASHMRY786 (talk • contribs) 20:35, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

ASHMRY786 Please try to understand, this is not "my opinion" this is a consensus, which is common on many of our articles. We only include WP:Notable entries on many, if not most, lists. You have two options - accept the consensus, or write the articles, but please be aware that articles need to meet our inclusion standards. If you wish to write an article, please read Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) and please read and follow Wikipedia:Your first article for how to write an article. Please be aware that writing an acceptable article is one of the most difficult things to do, especially for new editors, - Arjayay (talk) 20:51, 20 October 2017 (UTC) Your language shows you are one of the persons who are behind the management of Wikipedia. But it's not true.

First of all, be clear that this is not the policy of Wikipedia. This is your misunderstood conception only. This kind of illogical policy can not be adopted by any organization like Wikipedia. You because successful to destroy my hardwork as this platform is publical. I am writing on Facebook for 5 years. There is no such issues. I will not write anymore on wiki. I can not see my hardwork being spoiled by the illogical person like you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ASHMRY786 (talk • contribs) 21:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

What is the number of INSURANCE COMPANIES IN INDIA?

I I added the rest one companies in article. someone removed them ASHMRY786 (talk) 20:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of insurance companies in India. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:27, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, be clear that this is not the policy of Wikipedia. This is your misunderstood conception only. This kind of illogical policy can not be adopted by any organization like Wikipedia. You because successful to destroy my hardwork as this platform is publical. I am writing on Facebook for 5 years. There is no such issues. I will not write anymore on wiki. I can not see my hardwork being spoiled by the illogical person like you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ASHMRY786 (talk • contribs) 21:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of CA. ASHWANI MAURYA

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on CA. ASHWANI MAURYA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JC7V-constructive zone 20:08, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashwani Maurya (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:ANYBIO], lacks any sources or references

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ashwani Maurya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ashwani Maurya, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:01, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ASHMRY786! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 08:01, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ashwani Maurya

Hello, ASHMRY786. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ashwani Maurya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 17:02, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hello, I'm Tayi Arajakate. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Arnab Goswami, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Tayi Arajakate _Talk 14:16, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 14:50, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]